Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Inequality in energy consumption: statistical equilibrium or a question of accounting conventions?

Energy inequality: statistical equilibrium or accounting convention?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Special Topics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding inequality energy consumption at the global level delivers key insights for strategies to mitigate climate change. Recent contributions [4, 28, 48, 49] have studied energy inequality through the lens of maximum entropy. They claim a weighted international distribution of total primary energy demand should approach a Boltzmann-Gibbs maximum entropy equilibrium distribution in the form of an exponential distribution. This implies convergence to a Gini coefficient of 0.5 from above. The present paper challenges the validity of this claim and critically discusses the applicability of statistical equilibrium reasoning to economics from the viewpoint of social accounting. It is shown that the exponential distribution is only a robust candidate for a statistical equilibrium of energy inequality when employing one particular accounting convention for energy flows, the substitution method. But this method has become problematic with a higher renewable share in the international energy mix, and no other accounting method supports the claim of a convergence to a 0.5 Gini. We conclude that the findings based on maximum entropy reasoning are sensitive to accounting conventions and critically discuss the epistemological implications of this sensitivity for the use of maximum entropy approaches in social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. Akizu-Gardoki, G. Bueno, T. Wiedmann, J.M. Lopez-Guede, I. Arto, P. Hernandez, D. Moran, J. Clean. Prod. 202, 1145 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Anand, P. Segal, The global distribution of income, in Handbook of income distribution (Elsevier B.V., 2015), pp. 37–979

  3. A.B. Atkinson, J. Econ. Theory 2, 244 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Banerjee, V.M. Yakovenko, New J. Phys. 12, 075032 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J.K. Boyce, Ecol. Econ. 150, 52 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Chancel, T. Piketty, Carbon and Inequality: from Kyoto to Paris, Paris Sch. Econ. 1, 1–4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Csereklyei, M. Rubio-Varas, D.I. Stern, Energy J. 37, 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Darvas, World Dev. 121, 16 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P.L. Dos Santos, Complexity 2017, 9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P.L. dos Santos, E. Scharfenaker, Ind. Corp. Chang. 28, 1587 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Dragulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 585 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. U. Dubois, H. Meier, Energy Res, Soc. Sci. 18, 21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Duro, Energy Policy 83, 257 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Duro, V. Alcántara, E. Padilla, Ecol. Econ. 69, 2468 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. EIA, Monthly Energy Review (U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2019)

  16. E. Farjoun, M. Machover, Laws of Chaos: a probabilistic approach to political economy (Verso, London, 1983)

  17. D.K. Foley, J. Econ. Theory. 62, 321 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Fouquet, Energy Res, Soc. Sci. 22, 7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Fremstad, M. Paul, Ecol. Econ. 163, 88 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.K. Galbraith, M. Berner, Inequality and industrial change?: a global view (2001)

  21. F. Hedenus, C. Azar, Ecol. Econ. 55, 351 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.K. Heun, P.E. Brockway, Appl. Energy 251, 112697 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. International Energy Agency, Word energy balances 2018 (International Energy Agency, Paris, 2018)

  24. J.D. Jenkins, Energy Policy 69, 467 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Koomey, Z. Schmidt, H. Hummel, J. Weyant, Environ. Model. Softw. 111, 268 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Krey, O. Masera, G. Blanford, T. Bruckner, R. Cooke, K. Fisher-Vanden, H. Haberl, E. Hertwich, E. Kriegler, D. Mueller, S. Paltsev, L. Price, S. Schlömer, D. Ürge-Vorsatz, D. van Vuuren, T. Zwickel, Annex II: metrics and methodology, in Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate, edited by O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J.C. Minx (2014)

  27. R. Lahoti, A. Jayadev, S.G. Reddy, J. Glob. Dev. 7, 61 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Lawrence, Q. Liu, V.M. Yakovenko, Entropy 15, 5565 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. T. Lawson, The nature of social reality (Routledge, Oxford, New York, 2019)

  30. J. Macknick, Carbon Manag. 2, 189 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Maza, J. Villaverde, Energy Policy 36, 4255 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. B. Milanovic, Worlds apart (Princeton University Press, 2005)

  33. B. Milanovic, Global inequality?: a new approach for the age of globalization (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016)

  34. M. Nino-Zarazua, L. Roope, F. Tarp, Rev. Income Wealth 63, 661 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. G.P. Peters, R.M. Andrew, J.G. Canadell, S. Fuss, R.B. Jackson, J.I. Korsbakken, C. Le Quéré, N. Nakicenovic, Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 118 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. N.D. Rao, J. Min, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev, Clim. Chang. 9, 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. N.D. Rao, S. Pachauri, Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 25011 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Ravallion, Eur. Econ. Rev. 111, 85 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Rogelj, A. Popp, K.V. Calvin, G. Luderer, J. Emmerling, D. Gernaat, S. Fujimori, J. Strefler, T. Hasegawa, G. Marangoni, V. Krey, E. Kriegler, K. Riahi, D.P. Van Vuuren, J. Doelman, L. Drouet, J. Edmonds, O. Fricko, M. Harmsen, P. Havlk, F. Humpenöder, E. Stehfest, M. Tavoni, Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 325 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. E. Scharfenaker, G. Semieniuk, Metroeconomica 68, 465 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. G. Semieniuk, Economic Growth: Is Faster Growth Greener?, SOAS Dep. Econ. Work. Pap. Ser. 208, 2018

  42. G. Semieniuk, L. Taylor, A. Rezai, D.K. Foley, Do the IPCC 1.5 °C scenarios stand up to historical scrutiny?, SOAS Econ Work. Pap. Ser., 2020

  43. A. Shaikh, I. The U.S.-China Trade Balance and the Theory of Free Trade: Debunking the Currency Manipulation Argument, Weber, New Sch. Dep. Econ. Work. Pap., Working Papers 1805, 2018

  44. T. Sousa, P.E. Brockway, J.M. Cullen, S.T. Henriques, J. Miller, A.C. Serrenho, T. Domingos, Ecol. Econ. 141, 11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Y. Tao, X. Wu, T. Zhou, W. Yan, Y. Huang, H. Yu, B. Mondal, V.M. Yakovenko, J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 14, 345 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. J.J. Teixidó, S.F. Verde, Ecol. Econ. 138, 109 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. UN, The united nations energy statistics database (United Nations Energy Statistics Division, New York, 2016)

  48. V. Yakovenko, Sci. Culture 76, 430 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. V.M. Yakovenko, Applications of statistical mechanics to economics: entropic origin of the probability distributions of money, income, and energy consumption, in Social fairness and economics: economic essays in the spirit of Duncan Foley, edited by L. Taylor, A. Rezai, T. Michl (Routledge, Oxford, New York, 2013), pp. 53–82

  50. J. Yang, J. Econ. Surv. 32, 940 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Political Economy Research Institute & Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA

    Gregor Semieniuk

  2. Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, London, UK

    Gregor Semieniuk

  3. Department of Economics & Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA

    Isabella M. Weber

Authors
  1. Gregor Semieniuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabella M. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregor Semieniuk.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semieniuk, G., Weber, I.M. Inequality in energy consumption: statistical equilibrium or a question of accounting conventions?. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 1705–1714 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900125-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900125-5

Search

Navigation