The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 226, Issue 2, pp 269–281 | Cite as

Stigmergy in the design of social environments

Regular Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Information in Physics and Beyond

Abstract

The paper argues that physical environments are relevant and at time critical elements of the cognitive activities of individual agents and communities, and this should become an important consideration in designing such environments. To this end, the concept of stigmergy can be instrumental to the evaluation and design of environments that facilitate cognitive and information processing activities of human individuals and communities. Stigmergy is here introduced both as an explanatory principle and as the operative mechanism by which structured environments can operate as mediums of shared knowledge and mediators of self-organizing processes of coordination among loosely coupled individuals. The arguments are supported by three case studies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Susi, T. Ziemke, Cogn. Syst. Res. 2, 273 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Ricci, A. Omicini, M. Viroli, L. Gardelli, E. Oliva, in Environ. Multi-Agent Syst. III (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006), pp. 124–140Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Van Dyke Parunak, in Environ. Multi-Agent Sysyt. II (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006) pp. 163–186Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.F. Sallis, G. Karen, Futur. Child. 16, 89 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Wohl, Int. J. Islam. Archit. 4, 39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Milun, Pathologies of Modern Space: Empty Space, Urban Anxiety, and the Recovery of the Public Self (Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Marsh, C. Onof, Cogn. Syst. Res. 9, 136 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.S. Turner, Am. Entomol. 51, 1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Theraulaz, E. Bonabeau, Artif. Life 5, 97 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Heylighen, Cogn. Syst. Res. 38, 4 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Rowlands, Ethics Environ. 10, 5 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Heylighen, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 5, 253 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Heylighen, Cogn. Syst. Res. 38, 50 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Moussaid, S. Garnier, G. Theraulaz, D. Helbing, Top. Cogn. Sci. 1, 469 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Helbing, L. Buzna, A. Johansson, T. Werner, Transp. Sci. 39, 1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Robbins, M. Aydede, The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Wilson, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 4 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.M. Todd, G. Gigerenzer, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 167 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Heylighen, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 5, 3 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Elliott, Ph.D. thesis, Victorian College of the Arts, 2007Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Levin, G.S. Borghini, S. Geiger, Z. Markfeld, in ECIS 2014 Proc. - 22nd Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst. (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.R. Hevner, Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 87 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    United Nations, Habitat III Issue Paper 22: Informal Settlements, 2015Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Baley, Bedouin Law from Sinai and the Negev: Justice without Government (9780300153248): Clinton Bailey: Books (Yale University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. Rosner Manor, G.S. Borghini, Y. Rofe’, Complex. Gov. Networks (to be published)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Fenster, Prog. Plann. 39, 167 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.S. Reber, Implicit Learning: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Manor-Rosner, Y. Rofè, S. Abu-Rabia-Queder, in Vernac. Herit. Earthen Archit. (CRC Press, 2013), pp. 531–536Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Gehl, B.B. Svarre, J. Risom, Plan. News 37, 6 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O. Avital, Speaker Notes, Holon Institute of Technology, 2015Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Dorigo, E. Bonabeau, G. Theraulaz, Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 16, 851 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Levi, Speaker Notes, Holon Institute of Technology, 2015Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Heylighen, Worldviews, Science and Us (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Kendal, J.J. Tehrani, J. Odling-Smee, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 366, 1566 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. Odling-Smee, J.S. Turner, Biol. Theory 6, 283 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Design, Holon Institute of TechnologyHolonIsrael
  2. 2.ECCO, Evolution, Complexity and Cognition Research Group, Vrije UniversityBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations