Advertisement

The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 224, Issue 17–18, pp 3407–3417 | Cite as

Flow through the nasal cavity of the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias

  • L.L. Timm-Davis
  • F.E. Fish
Regular Article Applied Physics and Robotics
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Dynamics of Animal Systems

Abstract

The nasal cavity of spiny dogfish is a blind capsule with no internal connection to the oral cavity. Water is envisioned to flow through the cavity in a smooth, continuous flow pattern; however, this assumption is based on previous descriptions of the morphology of the olfactory cavity. No experimentation on the flow through the internal nasal cavity has been reported. Morphology of the head of the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) does not suggest a close external connection between the oral and nasal systems. However, dye visualization showed that there was flow through the nasal apparatus and from the excurrent nostril to the mouth when respiratory flows were simulated. The hydrodynamic flow through the nasal cavity was observed from flow tank experiments. The dorsum of the nasal cavity of shark heads from dead animals was exposed by dissection and a glass plate was glued over of the exposed cavity. When the head was placed in a flow, dye was observed to be drawn passively into the cavity showing a complex, three-dimensional hydrodynamic flow. Dye entered the incurrent nostril, flowed through the nasal lamellae, crossed over and under the nasal valve, and circulated around the nasal valve before exiting the excurrent nostril. When the nasal valve was removed, the dye became stagnant and back flowed out through the incurrent nostril. The single nasal valve has a hydrodynamic function that organizes a coherent flow of water through the cavity without disruption. The results suggest that the morphology of the nasal apparatus in concert with respiratory flow and ambient flows from active swimming can be used to draw water through the olfactory cavity of the shark.

Keywords

Nasal Cavity European Physical Journal Special Topic Olfactory Organ Nasal Valve Spiny Dogfish 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C.F. Baker, J.C. Montgomery, T.E. Dennis, J. Comp. Physiol. 188, 553 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.P.L. Cox, J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 1 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.E. Sheldon, J. Exp. Zool. 10, 51 (1911)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.L. Tester, Olfaction, gustation, and the common chemical sense in sharks. In Sharks and survival, edited by P.W. Gilbert (Lexington: D.C. Heath and Co, 1963), p. 225Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.A. Bell, Copeia 1993, 144 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Bleckman, M.H. Hofmann, Special senses. In Sharks, skates, and rays: The biology of elasmobranch fishes, edited by W.C. Hamlett (JHU Press, 1999), p. 300Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.J.V. Compagno, (yr1999). Systematics and body form. In Sharks, skates, and rays: The biology of elasmobranch fishes, edited by W.C. Hamlett, (JHU Press, 1999), p. 1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.P. Allis Jr., J. Morph. 32, 145 (1919)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.L. Timm, F.E. Fish, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 414, 75 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Theisen, E. Zeiske, H. Breucker, Acta Zool. 67, 73 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Zeiske, B. Theisen, S.H. Gruber, Can. J. Zool. 65, 2406 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Kleerekoper, Chemoreception and its interaction with flow and light perception in the locomotion and orientation of some elasmobranchs. In Sensory biology of sharks, skates, and rays, edited by E.S. Hodgson, R.F. Mathewson (Arlington, Va.: Office of Naval Research, 1978), p. 269Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Fishelson, A. Baranes, Anat. Rec. 249, 409 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.D. Rygg, J.P.L. Cox, R. Abel, A.G. Webb, N.B. Smith, B.A. Craven, PLOS ONE 8, e59783 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.L. Abel, J.S. Maclaine, R. Cotton, V.B. Xuan, T.B. Nickels, T.H. Clark, Z. Wang, J.P.L Cox, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 155, 464 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.H. Parker, R.E. Sheldon, Bull. U.S. Bureau Fish. 32, 35 (1913)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.W. Gilbert, Sci. Amer. 207, 60 (1962)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. von Wahlert, Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. 159, 1 (1966)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Herberhold, Int. Rhinol. 7, 45 (1969)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.P.L. Cox, Fish 14, 364 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.M. Gardiner, R.E. Hueter, K.P. Maruska, J.A. Sisneros, B.M. Casper, D.A. Mann, L.S. Demski, Sensory physiology and behavior of elasmobranchs. In Biology of sharks and their relatives, 2nd Ed., edited by E.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick, M.R. Heithaus (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2012), p. 349Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Vogel, M. LaBarbera, Biosci. 28, 638 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Merzkirch, Flow visualization (Academic Press, New York, 1974)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.W. Johnson, The handbook of fluid dynamics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B.E. Flammang, G.V. Lauder, D.R. Troolin, T. Strand, T. Struc. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, rspb20110489 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P.N. Shankar, M.D. Deshpande, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 93 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Vogel, Life in moving fluids (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    K.B. Døving, M. Dubois-Dauphin, A. Holley, F. Joudan, Acta. Zool. 58, 245 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.M. Gardiner, J. Atema, J. Exp. Biol. 210, 1925 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    G.M. Hughes, S.I. Umezawa, J. Exp. Biol. 49, 557 (1968)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    G.M. Hughes, Comparative physiology of vertebrate respiration (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S.L. Sanderson, J.J. Cech, Jr., M.R. Patterson, Sci. 251, 1346 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S.L. Sanderson, J.J. Cech, Jr., A.Y. Cheer, J. Exp. Biol. 186, 145 (1994)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    G.F. Holeton, D.R. Jones, J. Exp. Biol. 63, 537 (1975)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    G.V. Lauder, J. Exp. Biol. 113, 151 (1984)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    V.G. Springer, J.P. Gold, Shark in question (Smithsonian, Washington, D.C., 1989)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A.P. Klimley, The biology of sharks and rays (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine Biology & Wildlife and Fisheries ScienceTexas A&M UniversityGalvestonUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyWest Chester UniversityWest ChesterUSA

Personalised recommendations