Manifesto of computational social science

Abstract

The increasing integration of technology into our lives has created unprecedented volumes of data on society’s everyday behaviour. Such data opens up exciting new opportunities to work towards a quantitative understanding of our complex social systems, within the realms of a new discipline known as Computational Social Science. Against a background of financial crises, riots and international epidemics, the urgent need for a greater comprehension of the complexity of our interconnected global society and an ability to apply such insights in policy decisions is clear. This manifesto outlines the objectives of this new scientific direction, considering the challenges involved in it, and the extensive impact on science, technology and society that the success of this endeavour is likely to bring about.

Graphical abstract

References

  1. 1.

    D. Helbing, S. Balietti, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 195, 3 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Y. Song, L. Zhang, C.L. Giles, ACM Transactions on the Web 5 4(2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    D. Helbing, J. Jost, D. Lane, Adv. Complex Syst. 11, 485 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    P. Richerson, R. Boyd, J. Social Biological Struct. 1, 127 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    J.C. Chesnais, The Demographic Transition: Stages, Patterns, and Economic Implications: A Longitudinal Study of Sixty-Seven Countries Covering the Period 1720–1984 (Oxford University Press, 1993)

  6. 6.

    J.P. Onnela, J. Saramäki, J. Hyvonen, G. Szabó, D. Lazer, K. Kaski, J. Kertész, A.L. Barabási, PNAS 104, 7332 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    D.V. Balcan, B. Colizza, H. Goncalves, J.J. Ramasco, A. Vespignani, PNAS USA 106, 21484 (2009)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    M. Karsai, M. Kivelä, R.K. Pan, K. Kaski, J. Kertész, A.L. Barabási, J. Saramäki, Phys. Rev. E 83, 1 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    D. Lazer, A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A. Barabási, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, G. King, D. Roy, M.W. Macy, M. Van Alystyn, Science 323, 721 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    T.C. Schelling, J. Math. Sociol. 1, 143 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    L. Putterman, Science 328, 578 (2010)

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    D. Helbing, S. Bishop, R. Conte, P. Lukowicz, J.B. McCarthy, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    J. Henrich, J. Ensminger, R. McElreath, A. Barr, C. Barrett, A. Bolyanatz, J.C. Cardenas, M. Gurven, E. Gwako, N. Henrich, C. Lesorogol, F. Marlowe, D. Tracer, J. Ziker, Science 327, 1480 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    H. Peyton Young, Social Norms and Norm Dynamics (Princeton University Press, 2009)

  15. 15.

    J.M. Epstein, Comput. Econom. 18, 9 (2001)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    C. Bicchieri, The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

  17. 17.

    E. Ullman-Margalit, Erkenntnis 11, 143 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    A. Schotter, The Economic Theory of Social Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

  19. 19.

    J.M. Epstein, PNAS 99, 7243 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    M. Mauss, The Gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies (Routledge, London 1922)

  21. 21.

    J. Rouchier, M. O’Connor, F. Bousquet, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simulation 4 (2001)

  22. 22.

    A.S. Golder, B.A. Huberman, J. Information Sci. 32, 198 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    C. Cattuto, V. Loreto, L. Pietronero, PNAS USA 104, 146 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    C. Cattuto, A. Barrat, A. Baldassarri, G. Schehr, V. Loreto, PNAS USA 106, 10511 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    M.A. Nowak, K. Sigmund, Nature 393, 573 (1998)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    K. Walker, Corporate Reputation Review 12, 357 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    J.J. Ebbers, N.M. Wijnberg, Strategic Organization 8, 255 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    R. Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York, 1984), p. 1

  29. 29.

    W. Raub, J. Weesie, Amer. J. Sociol. 96, 626 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    D. Vinković, A. Kirman, PNAS 103, 19261 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    W.A. Clark, M. Fossett, PNAS USA 105, 4109 (2008)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    L. Gauvin, J. Vannimenus, J.P. Nadal, Eur. Phys. J. B – Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 70, 293 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    N. Gilbert, R. Conte (eds.), Artificial Societies: the Computer Simulation of Social Life (University College London Press, 1995)

  34. 34.

    N. Gilbert, R. Conte Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life (University College London Press, London, 1995), p. 144

  35. 35.

    D. Dennett, Times Literary Supplement 25, 3 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    S. Havlin, D.Y. Kenett, E. Ben-Jacob, A. Bunde, R. Cohen, H. Hermann, J.W. Kantelhardt, J. Kertsz, S. Kirkpatrick, J. Kurths, Y. Portugali, S. Solomon, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 273 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    J.M. Pujol, A. Flache, J. Delgado, R. Sanguessa, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simulation 8, 41 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    C. Alós-Ferrer, G. Kirchsteiger, Economic Theory 44, 339 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    A. Yasutomi, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 82, 180 (1995)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    R.L. Axtell, J.M. Epstein, J.S. Dean, G.J. Gumerman, A.C. Swedlund, J. Harburger, S. Chakravarty, R. Hammond, J. Parker, M. Parkeraj, PNAS 4, 7275 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    L.E. Cederman, Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop (Princeton University Press, 1997)

  42. 42.

    R. Axelrod, Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 80, 1095 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    S. Sen, S. Airiau, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical intelligence (ACM, Hyderabad, 2007), p. 1507

  44. 44.

    R. Hegselmann, O. Will, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Multi-agent-based simulation (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2010), p. 123

  45. 45.

    D. Lewis, Convention. A Philosophical Study (Harvard University Press, 1969)

  46. 46.

    N.J. Saam, A. Harrer, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simulation 2 (1999)

  47. 47.

    M. Xenitidou, B. Edmonds (eds.), Dynamic View of Norms (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)

  48. 48.

    R. Conte, G. Andrighetto, M. Campenn (eds.), Minding Norms (Oxford University Press, forthcoming)

  49. 49.

    W.B. Arthur, Handbook of Comput. Econom., 2: Agent-Based Comput. Econom. (Elsevier, 2005), p. 1551

  50. 50.

    W.B. Arthur, Amer. Econom. Rev. 84, 406 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    M.W. Macy, A. Flache, PNAS USA 99, 7229 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    J.M. Epstein, Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling (Princeton University Press, 2007)

  53. 53.

    J.M. Galán, L.R. Izquierdo, S.S. Izquierdo, J.I. Santos, R. del Olmo, A. López-Paredes, B. Edmonds, J. Artificial Soc. Social Simul. 12, 1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    N.A. Christakis, J.H. Fowler, N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 370 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    R. Lyons, Stat. Politics Policy 2, 2 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    T.A.B. Snijders, G.G. Van de Bunt, C.E.G. Steglich, Social Networks 32, 44 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    P.L. Borrill, L. Testfatsion, The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology (Edward Elgar Publishers, New York, 2011), p. 228

  58. 58.

    F. Darema, Applications Systems, Proc. IEEE 93, 692 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Y. Benkler, Yale Law J. 112, 369 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    D.C. Brabham, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14, 75 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    A. Kittur, E.H. Chi, B. Suh, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (ACM, New York, 2008), p. 453

  62. 62.

    N. Kiukkonen, J. Blom, O. Dousse, D. Gatica-Perez, J. Laurila, Proceedings of International Conference on Pervasive Services (ACM, Berlin, 2010)

  63. 63.

    N. Lane, E. Miluzzo, H. Lu, D. Peebles, T. Choudhury, A. Campbell, IEEE Communications 48, 140 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    R. Conte, B. Edmonds, S. Moss, R.K. Sawyer, Comput. Math. Organization Theory 7, 183 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    V.M. Eguíluz, M.G. Zimmermann, C.J. Cela-Conde, M. San Miguel, Amer. J. Scociol. 110, 977 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    J.S. Sichman, R. Conte, Comput. Math. Organization Theory 8 (2002)

  67. 67.

    G. Ehrhardt, M. Marsili, F. Vega-Redondo, Phys. Rev. E 74, 1 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    C. Castelfranchi, R. Conte, Microsimulation and the social science (Springer-Verlag, 1996), p. 394

  69. 69.

    G.P. Huber, Organization Science 2, 88 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    G. Ritzer (ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Syntheses (Columbia University Press, 1990), p. 1

  71. 71.

    F.C. Billari, T. Fent, A. Prskawetz, J. Scheffran, Agent-Based Computational Modelling Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences (Physica Verlag-Springer, Heidelberg, 2006)

  72. 72.

    M. Assen, V. Buskens, R. Werner, J. Math. Sociol. 35 (2011)

  73. 73.

    R. Putnam, Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (Simon & Schuster, 2001)

  74. 74.

    H. Farrell, J. Knight, Politics & Society 31, 537 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    M. Shadnam, T.B. Lawrence, Business Ethics Quarterly 21, 379 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    R. Axelrod, J. Conflict Resol. 41, 203 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    D. Centola, J.C. González-Avella, V.M. Eguíluz, M. San Miguel, J. Conflict Resol. 51, 905 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    A. Flache, M.W. Macy, J. Conflict Resol. 55, 970 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    J.C. González-Avella, M.G. Cosenza, K. Klemm, V.M. Eguíluz, M. San Miguel, J. Artificial Social Simul. 10, 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    X. Castello, F. Vazquez, V.M. Eguiluz, L. Loureiro-Porto, M. San Miguel, L. Chapel, G. Deffuant, Viability and Resilience of Complex Systems. Concepts, Methods and Case Studies from Ecology and Society (Springer Verlag, 2011), p. 49

  81. 81.

    D. Helbing, W. Yu, H. Rauhut, J. Math. Sociol. 35, 177 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    J. Grujic, C. Fosco, L. Araujo, J.A. Cuesta, A. Sanchez, PLoS ONE 5, e13749 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    W.S. Bainbridge, Science 317, 472 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    L. Habib, W. Line, Mind, Culture Activity 14, 266 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    R. Dunbar, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Rev. 6, 178 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    R. Conte, M. Paolucci, Reputation in artificial societies. Social beliefs for social control (Kluwer, 2002)

  87. 87.

    R. Conte, M. Paolucci, J. Sabater Mir, Adv. Complex Syst. 11, 303 (2008)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    F. Giardini, R. Conte, Simulation 88, 18 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    M. Paolucci, T. Eymann, W. Jager, J. Sabater-Mir, R. Conte, S. Marmo, S. Picascia, W. Quattrociocchi, T. Balke, S. Koenig, T. Broekhuizen, D. Trampe, M. Tuk, I. Brito, I. Pinyol, D. Villatoro, Social Knowledge for e-Governance: Theory and Technology of Reputation (ISTC-CNR, Rome 2009)

  90. 90.

    R. Falcone, C. Castelfranchi, Trust Theory: A Socio-Cognitive and Computational Model (Wiley, 2010)

  91. 91.

    G.A. Akerlof, R.J. Shiller, Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism (Princeron University Press, 2009), p. 1

  92. 92.

    W.C. Salmon, Four Decades of Scientific Explanation (Pittsburgh University Press, 1989)

  93. 93.

    M. Weisberg, When less is more: Tradeoffs and idealization in model building (Stanford University Press, 2003)

  94. 94.

    R.A. Fisher, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, 1930)

  95. 95.

    J.M. Epstein, Complexity 4, 41 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    F. Squazzoni (ed.), Epistemological Aspects of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2009), p. 29

  97. 97.

    D. Helbing, Sci. Culture 76, 315 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    J. Lorenz, H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer, D. Helbing, PNAS USA 108, 9020 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    H. Gintis, The Bounds of Reason (Princeton University Press, 2009)

  100. 100.

    M. San Miguel, J. Johnson, J. Kertesz, K. Kaski, A. Daz-Guilera, R.S. MacKay, V. Loreto, P. Erdi, D. Helbing, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 245 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Conte.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G. et al. Manifesto of computational social science. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214, 325–346 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01697-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • European Physical Journal Special Topic
  • Multiagent System
  • Social Phenomenon
  • Social Complexity
  • Complex World