Towards a global participatory platform

Democratising open data, complexity science and collective intelligence


The FuturICT project seeks to use the power of big data, analytic models grounded in complexity science, and the collective intelligence they yield for societal benefit. Accordingly, this paper argues that these new tools should not remain the preserve of restricted government, scientific or corporate élites, but be opened up for societal engagement and critique. To democratise such assets as a public good, requires a sustainable ecosystem enabling different kinds of stakeholder in society, including but not limited to, citizens and advocacy groups, school and university students, policy analysts, scientists, software developers, journalists and politicians. Our working name for envisioning a sociotechnical infrastructure capable of engaging such a wide constituency is the Global Participatory Platform (GPP). We consider what it means to develop a GPP at the different levels of data, models and deliberation, motivating a framework for different stakeholders to find their ecological niches at different levels within the system, serving the functions of (i) sensing the environment in order to pool data, (ii) mining the resulting data for patterns in order to model the past/present/future, and (iii) sharing and contesting possible interpretations of what those models might mean, and in a policy context, possible decisions. A research objective is also to apply the concepts and tools of complexity science and social science to the project’s own work. We therefore conceive the global participatory platform as a resilient, epistemic ecosystem, whose design will make it capable of self-organization and adaptation to a dynamic environment, and whose structure and contributions are themselves networks of stakeholders, challenges, issues, ideas and arguments whose structure and dynamics can be modelled and analysed.

Graphical abstract


  1. 1.

    K. Aberer, S. Sathe, D. Chakraborty, A. Martinoli, G. Barrenetxea, B. Faltings, L. Thiele, OpenSense: Open Community Driven Sensing of Environment, Nov. 2 (2010)

  2. 2.

    C. Anderson. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More (Hyperion Books, 2006)

  3. 3.

    E.F. Anderson, L. McLoughlin, F. Liarokapis, C. Peters, P. Petridis, S. de Freitas, Serious Games in Cultural Heritage, 22–25 September (2009)

  4. 4.

    S. Arnab, P. Petridis, I. DunwellS. de Freitas, Enhancing learning in distributed virtual worlds through touch: a browser- based architecture for haptic interaction. (Springer Verlag, London, 2011)

  5. 5.

    S.R. Arnstein, J. Amer. Inst. Planners 35, 216 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, P. McBurney, Artificial Intelligence Law (Special Issue on eDemocracy) 14, 261 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    J. Bertin, Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1983)

  8. 8.

    C. Bizer, T. Heath, T. Berners-Lee, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst. 5, 1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    G.C. Bowker, S.L. Star, Building Information Infrastructures for Social Worlds - The Role of Classifications and Standards. In Community Computing and Support Systems, Social Interaction in Networked Communities [the book is based on the Kyoto Meeting on Social Interaction and Communityware, held in Kyoto, Japan, in June 1998] (Springer-Verlag), p. 231

  10. 10.

    L. Browning, T. Boudès, Emerg. Complex. Organiz. 7, 35 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    S. Buckingham Shum, The Roots of Computer-Supported Argument Visualization (Springer-Verlag, London, 2003), p. 3

  12. 12.

    S. Buckingham Shum, A.M. Selvin, M. Sierhuis, J. Conklin, C.B. Haley, B. Nuseibeh, Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006), p. 111

  13. 13.

    S. Buckingham Shum, Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (2008)

  14. 14.

    A.T. Campbell, S.B. Eisenman, N.D. Lane, E. Miluzzo, R.A. Peterson, H. Lu, X. Zheng, M. Musolesi, K. Fodor, Gahng-Seop Ah, The Rise of People-Centric Sensing, IEEE Internet Computing, July/August 12–21 (2008)

  15. 15.

    S.K. Card, J.D. Mackinlay, B. Shneiderman, Readings in Information Visualisation – Using Vision to Think (Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1999)

  16. 16.

    P. Culmsee, K. Awati, The Heretic’s Guide to Best Practices: The Reality of Managing Wicked Problems in Organisations (iUniverse Inc., Bloomington IN, 2011)

  17. 17.

    D. Fensel, H. Lausen, A. Polleres, J. Bruijn, M. Stollberg, D. Roman, J. Domingue, Enabling Semantic Web Services: The Web Service Modelling Ontology (Springer, Berlin, 2006)

  18. 18.

    A. De Liddo, S. Buckingham Shum, I. Quinto, M. Bachler, L. Cannavacciuolo, Discourse-Centric Learning Analytics, 27 Feb.–1 Mar. (2011)

  19. 19.

    A. De Liddo, Á. Sándor, S. Buckingham Shum, Comp. Supp. Cooperative Work 21, 417 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    A de Waard, S. Buckingham Shum, A. Carusi, J. Park, M. Samwald, Á. Sándor, Hypotheses, Evidence and Relationships: The HypER Approach for Representing Scientific Knowledge Claims, 26 Oct. (2009)

  21. 21.

    R. Deakin Crick, P. Broadfoot, G. Claxton, Assess. Education: Princ., Policy Pract. 11, 248 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    C. Dellarocas, Reputation Mechanisms (Elsevier Publishing, 2006)

  23. 23.

    J. Domingue, L. Cabral, S. Galizia, V. Tanasescu, A. Gugliotta, B. Norton, C. Pedrinaci, J. Web Semantics 6, 109 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    G. Doppelt, Democracy and Technology (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 2006), p. 85

  25. 25.

    I. Dunwell, S. Christmas, S. de Freitas, Code of Everand: Evaluation of the Game (Department of Transport, UK, London, 2011)

  26. 26.

    I. DunwellS. de Freitas, Four-dimensional consideration of feedback in serious games (Continuum Publishing, 2011)

  27. 27.

    N. Eagle, A. Pentland, Pers. Ubiquitous Comp. 10, 255 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    E.L. Eisenstein, The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe, vol. 1 (1979)

  29. 29.

    D.C. Engelbart, Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework, Technical Report SRI Project No. 3578, Summary Report AFOSR-3233, Stanford Research Institute (1962)

  30. 30.

    A. Ferscha, Implicit Interaction (2011)

  31. 31.

    J. Hagel, J. Seely Brown, L. Davison, The Power of Pull: How Small Moves, Smartly Made, Can Set Big Things in Motion (Basic Books, 2010)

  32. 32.

    D. Helbing, S. Balietti, S. Bishop, P. Lukowicz, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 195, 165 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    C. Hess, E. Ostrom, Understanding Knowledge as a Commons (MIT Press, 2007)

  34. 34.

    J. Howe, The Rise of Crowdsourcing, Wired Magazine, June (2006)

  35. 35.

    L. Iandoli, M. Klein, G. Zollo, Int. J. Decision Support Syst. Technol. 1, 69 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    A. Irwin, Citizen Science (Routledge, London, 1995)

  37. 37.

    J. Johnson, S. Buckingham Shum, A. Willis, S. Bishop, T. Zamenopoulos, S. Swithenby, R. MacKay, Y. Merali, A. Lorincz, C. Costea, P. Bourgine, J. Louca, A. Kapenieks, P. Kelley, S. Caird, J. Bromley, R. Deakin Crick, C. Goldspink, P. Collet, A. Carbone, D. Helbing, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 215 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    D.A. Keim, J. Kohlhammer, G. Ellis, F. Mansmann, Mastering the Information Age - Solving Problems with Visual Analytics, Eurographics Association (2010)

  39. 39.

    G. Klein, B. Moon, R.F. Hoffman, IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 88 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    A. Krause, E. Horvitz, A. Kansal, F. Zhao, Toward Community Sensing, April 22–24 (2008)

  41. 41.

    J. Kwiat, From Aristotle to Gabriel: A Summary of the Narratology Literature for Story Technologies. Technical report, Technical Report KMI-08-01, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK (2008)

  42. 42.

    M. Maragoudakis, E. Loukis, Y. Charalabidis, A Review of Opinion Mining Methods for Analyzing Citizens’ Contributions in Public Policy Debate, August 29 – September 1 (2011)

  43. 43.

    E. Morozov, The Net Delusion. Allen Lane (2011)

  44. 44.

    P. Mulholland, T. Collins, Z. Zdrahal, Story fountain: intelligent support for story research and exploration (2004)

  45. 45.

    J. Mundinger, J.-Y. Le Boudec, Performance Evaluation 65, 212 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    J.D. Novak, Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1998)

  47. 47.

    W.J. Ong, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (Methuen, London, 1982)

  48. 48.

    N. Oreskes, E. Conway, Merchants of Doubt (Bloomsbury, 2010)

  49. 49.

    E. Ostrom, Governing the Commons (CUP, 1990)

  50. 50.

    D. Panzoli, C. Peters, I. Dunwell, S. Sanchez, P. Petridis, A. Protopsaltis, V. Scesa, S. de Freitas, Levels of Interaction: A User-Guided Experience in Large-Scale Virtual Environments (2010)

  51. 51.

    C. PedrinaciJ. Domingue, Toward the Next Wave of Services: Linked Services for the Web of Data, Journal of Universal Computer Science (2010)

  52. 52.

    P. Petridis, I. Dunwell, S. Arnab, S. de Freitas, Building Social Communities around Alternate Reality Games, 4–6 May (2011)

  53. 53.

    P. Pirolli, D.M. Russell, Human-Computer Inter. 26, 1 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    R. Price, A Palpable God: Thirty Stories Translated from the Bible With an Essay on the Origins and Life of Narrative (Atheneum, 1978)

  55. 55.

    I. Rahwan, F. Zablith, C. Reed, Artificial Intell. 171, 897 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press, 1971)

  57. 57.

    G. Rebolledo-Mendez, D. Burden, S. de Freitas, A Model of Motivation for Virtual-Worlds Avatars (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), p. 535

  58. 58.

    C. Reynolds, R. Picard, Affective Sensors, Privacy, and Ethical Contracts, In Proceedings of CHI (2004), p. 1103

  59. 59.

    Y. Roberts, Grit: The skills for success and how they are grown. Technical report (The Young Foundation, 2009)

  60. 60.

    M.D. Russell, J.M. Stefik, P. Pirolli, S.K. Card, The Cost Structure of Sensemaking (1993)

  61. 61.

    L. Rutledge, M. Alberink, R. Brussee, S. Pokraev, W. van Dieten, M. Veenstra, Finding the story: broader applicability of semantics and discourse for hypermedia generation (2003)

  62. 62.

    S. Koussouris, Y. Charalabidis, D. Askounis, Trans. Gov. People, Proc. Policy 5, 8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Á. Sándor, A. Vorndran, Extracting relevant messages from social science research papers for improving retevance of retrieval, 10–14 May (2010)

  64. 64.

    C. Sanford, J. Rose, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 27, 406 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    O Scheuer, N Loll, F Pinkwart, B.M. McLaren, Int. J. Comp.-Supp. Collab. Argumentation 5, 43 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    S. Schütz, Lessons in ‘Designing for Tussle’ from Case Studies, Technical report, Trilogy EU FP7 Project, Deliverable D2 (2008)

  67. 67.

    C. Shirky, Here Comes Everybody: How Change Happens When People Come Together (Allen Lane, 2008)

  68. 68.

    R. Shokri, T. Georgios, J.-Y. Le Boudec, J.-P. Hubaux, Quantifying Location Privacy, May 22–25 (2011)

  69. 69.

    R. Sieber, Ann. Amer. Asso. Geograph. 96, 491 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    M. Sierhuis, S. Buckingham Shum, Human-agent knowledge cartography for e-science: NASA field trials at the Mars Desert Research Station, Springer (Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing Series), London (2008), p. 287

  71. 71.

    D. Snowden, Naturalizing Sensemaking (Psychology Press, 2010)

  72. 72.

    L.S. Star, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 35, 601 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    S.L. Star, G.C. Bowker, How to infrastructure (2006)

  74. 74.

    S.L. Star, K. Ruhleder, Inf. Syst. Res. 7, 111 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    S.L. Star, J.R. Griesemer, Social Stud. Sci. 19, 387 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    G. Tselentis, J. Domingue, A. Galis, A. Gavras, D. Hausheer, S. Krco, V. Lotz, T. Zahariadis, Towards the Future Internet - A European Research Perspective (IOS Press, 2009)

  77. 77.

    J. Van den Hoven, D. Helbing, D. Pedreschi, J. Domingo-Ferrer, F. Gianotti, M. Christen, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 153 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    H. Le Vu, K. Aberer, Effective Usage of Computational Trust Models in Rational Environments. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (2011)

  79. 79.

    H. Le Vu, T.G. Papaioannou, K. Aberer, Synergies of different reputation systems: challenges and opportunities, August 25–27 (2009)

  80. 80.

    B. Walker, C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, A. Kinzig, Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2:5) (2004)

    URL  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    D. Walton, C. Reed, F. Macagno, Argumentation Schemes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008)

  82. 82.

    C. Ware, Information Visualisation - Perception for Design (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2004)

  83. 83.

    K. Weick, Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995)

  84. 84.

    Y. Charalabidis, R. Kleinfeld, E. Loukis, S. Steglich, Systematically Exploiting Web 2.0 Social Media in Government for Extending Communication with Citizens (IGI Global, 2011)

Download references

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. Buckingham Shum or K. Aberer or A. Schmidt or S. Bishop or P. Lukowicz or S. Anderson or Y. Charalabidis or J. Domingue or S. de Freitas or I. Dunwell or B. Edmonds or F. Grey or M. Haklay or M. Jelasity or A. Karpištšenko or J. Kohlhammer or J. Lewis or J. Pitt or R. Sumner or D. Helbing.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buckingham Shum, S., Aberer, K., Schmidt, A. et al. Towards a global participatory platform. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214, 109–152 (2012).

Download citation


  • European Physical Journal Special Topic
  • Boundary Object
  • Smart City
  • Collective Intelligence
  • Information Visualisation