The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 163, Issue 1, pp 173–189 | Cite as

Bounds on the fine structure constantvariability from Fe ii absorption lines in QSO spectra

  • P. Molaro
  • D. Reimers
  • I. I. Agafonova
  • S. A. Levshakov
Article

Abstract

The Single Ion Differential α Measurement (SIDAM)method for measuring Δα/α and its figures of merit are illustrated together withthe results produced by means of Fe ii absorption linesof QSO intervening systems. The method providesΔα/α = -0.12 ±1.79 ppm (parts-per-million) at zabs = 1.15towards HE 0515-4414 and Δα/α = 5.66±2.67 ppm at zabs = 1.84towards Q 1101-264, which are so far the most accurate measurementsfor single systems. SIDAM analysis for 3 systems from the Chand et al. [1]sample provides inconsistent results which we interpret as due tocalibration errors of the Chand et al. data at the level ≈10 ppm.In one system evidence for photo-ionization Dopplershift between Mg ii and Fe ii lines is found.This evidence has important bearings on the Many Multipletmethod where the signal for Δα/αvariabilityis carried mainly by systems involving Mg ii absorbers.Some correlations are also found in the Murphy et al. [10] sample which suggestlarger errors than previously reported.Thus, we consider unlikely that both the Chand et al.and Murphy et al. datasets could providean estimate of Δα/α with an accuracy at the level of 1 ppm.A new spectrograph like the ESPRESSO projectwill be crucial to make progress in the astronomical determination of Δα/α.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Chand, R. Srianand, P, Petitjean, B. Aracil, Astron. Astrophys. 417, 853 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. P.P. Avelino, C.J.A.P. Martins, N.J. Nunes, K.A. Olive, Phys. Rev. D 74, 083508-1 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. C.J.A.P. Martins, in Precision Spectroscopy in Astrophysics, edited by L. Pasquini, M. Romaniello, N.C. Santos (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0610665] (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Y. Fujii (2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0709.2211]Google Scholar
  5. E. Peik, B. Lipphardt, H. Schnatz, et al. (2006) [arXiv:physics/0611088]Google Scholar
  6. C.R. Gould, E.I. Sharapov, S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. C 74, 024607-1 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. W.J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 489 (1984)Google Scholar
  8. M.T. Murphy, V.V. Flambaum, J.K. Webb, et al., in Astrophysics, Clocks and Fundamental Constants, edited by S.G. Karshenboim, E. Peik (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004), p. 131Google Scholar
  9. M.T. Murphy, V.V. Flambaum, J.K. Webb, et al., Lect. Notes Phys. 648, 131 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. D.F. Mota, J.D. Barrow, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 349, 291 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Y. Fujii, Phys. Lett. B 616, 141 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. T. Dent, S. Stern, C. Wetterich, J. Phys. G Special Issue (2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0710.4854] (in press)Google Scholar
  13. A. Coc, N.J. Nunes, K.A. Olive, J.P. Uzan, E. Vangioni, 2007, Phys. Rev. D 76, 3511 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. D.A. Varshalovich, S.A. Levshakov, JETP Lett. 58, 237 (1993)Google Scholar
  15. V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, J.K. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 888 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. J.K. Webb, V.V. Flambaum, C.W. Churchill, M.J. Drinkwater, J.D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 884 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. M.T. Murphy, J.K. Webb, V.V. Flambaum (2006) [arXiv:astro-ph/0612407]Google Scholar
  18. S.A. Levshakov, in Astrophysics, Clocks and Fundamental Constants, edited by S.G. Karshenboim, E. Peik (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004), p. 151Google Scholar
  19. R. Quast, D. Reimers, S.A. Levshakov, Astron. Astrophys. 415, L7 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. S.A. Levshakov, M. Centurión, P. Molaro, S. D’Odorico, Astron. Astrophys. 434, 827 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. S.A. Levshakov, M. Centurión, P. Molaro, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 449, 879 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. S.A Levshakov, P. Molaro, S. Lopez, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 466, 1077 (2007a)Google Scholar
  23. M.T. Murphy, J.K. Webb, V.V. Flambaum, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 345, 609 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. M. Aldenius, S. Johansson, M.T. Murphy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 370, 444 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. D.C. Morton, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 149, 205 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, M.G. Kozlov, M.V. Marchenko, Phys. Rev. A 66, 022501-1 (2002)Google Scholar
  27. S.G. Porsev, K.V. Koshelev, I.I. Tupitsyn, M.G. Kozlov, D. Reimers, S.A. Levshakov, Phys. Rev. A (2007) [arXiv:physics.atom-ph/0708.1662] (in press)Google Scholar
  28. H. Hao, K.Z. Stanek, A. Dobrzycki, et al., Astrophys. J 659, L99 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. S.A. Levshakov, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 269, 339 (1994)Google Scholar
  30. T. Ashenfelter, G.J. Mathews, K.A. Olive, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 041102-1 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. M.G. Kozlov, V.A. Korol, J.C. Berengut, V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, Phys. Rev. A 70, 062108-1 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. A. Kaufer, S. D’Odorico, L. Kaper,UV-Visual Echelle Spectrograph. User Manual (2004)http://www.eso.org/instruments/uves/userman/ Google Scholar
  33. S. A. Levshakov, I.I. Agafonova, P. Molaro, D. Reimers, Astron. Astrophys. (2007) (submitted)Google Scholar
  34. H. Chand, R. Srianand, P. Petitjean, B. Aracil, R. Quast, D. Reimers, Astron. Astrophys. 451, 45 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. B.A. Palmer, R. Engleman, Jr., Atlas of the Thorium Spectrum (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 1983)Google Scholar
  36. J.P. de Cuyper, H. Henserge, Astron. Astrophys. 129, 409 (1998)Google Scholar
  37. P. Molaro, L.A. Levshakov, S. Monai, M. Centurión, P. Bonifacio, S. D’Odorico, L. Monaco, Astron. Astrophys. (2007) [astro-ph/07123345] (in press)Google Scholar
  38. J. N. Bahcall, C.L. Steinhardt, D. Schlegel, Astrophys. J 600, 520 (2004)Google Scholar
  39. F.R. Hampel, E.M. Ronchetti, P.J. Rousseeuw, W.A. Stahel,Robust Statistics. The Approach Based on Influence Functions (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986)Google Scholar
  40. F. Mosteller, J.W. Tukey, Data Analysis and Regression (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977)Google Scholar
  41. P.E. Elyasberg, Cosmic Research 22, 643 (1984)Google Scholar
  42. H. Künsch, J. Beran, F. Hampel, Ann. Statist. 21, 943 (1993)Google Scholar
  43. F. Hampel, Research Report No. 93 (2000) (Seminar für Statistik, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschuler,http://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Research-Reports/)Google Scholar
  44. L. Pasquini, ASS Proc.Science with the VLT in the ELT Era, edited by A. Moorwood (2008)Google Scholar
  45. P. Molaro, ASS Proc.Science with the VLT in the ELT Era, edited by A. Moorwood (2008) [astro-ph/0712-4390]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Molaro
    • 1
  • D. Reimers
    • 2
  • I. I. Agafonova
    • 3
  • S. A. Levshakov
    • 3
  1. 1.Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via G.B. Tiepolo 11TriesteItaly
  2. 2.Hamburger Sternwarte, Universität HamburgHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Ioffe Physico-Technical InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations