Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of repulsive coupling in exhibiting distinct collective dynamical states

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Special Topics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The attractive coupling, in combination with the repulsive coupling, plays a significant role in eliciting a variety of collective dynamical behaviors. Due to its importance, we present a brief outline of the consequences of repulsive coupling in coupled nonlinear oscillators. Significantly, by incorporating control parameters in the repulsive coupling alone, we analyze the effect of repulsive coupling on collective dynamical behavior. Such parameters greatly control the efficiency of repulsive coupling, which results in the observation of various dynamical transitions. For instance, we find that the transition from traveling wave (TW) to synchronized (SYN) state through imperfect traveling chimera (ITC) state while reducing the control parameter from the maximal value at the traveling wave. Similarly, the transition to the synchronized state is observed through cluster chimera death (CCD), cluster oscillation death (COD), and imperfect amplitude chimera (IAC) states by decreasing the control parameter at the multi-chimera death (MCD) state. Specifically, we find that the observed collective dynamical behaviors including TW, ITC, IAC, CCD, COD, and MCD exist as consequences of the strength of repulsive coupling and nonlocal interactions. Finally, the perseverance of imperfect chimera states is also investigated in the presence of additional noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Pikovsky, M.G. Rosenblum, J. Kurths, Synchronization, A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Gupta, A. Campa, S. Ruffo, Statistical Physics of Synchronization (Springer, Berlin, 2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Palanivel, K. Suresh, D. Premraj, K. Thamilmaran, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 106, 35–43 (2018)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Pavithran, V.R. Unni, A.J. Varghese, D. Premraj, R.I. Sujith, C. Vijayan, A. Saha, N. Marwan, J. Kurths, Sci. Rep. 10, 17405–17408 (2020)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Shafiei, F. Parastesh, M. Jalili, S. Jafari, M. Perc, M. Slavinec, Eur. Phys. J. B 92(2), 1–7 (2019)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Sathiyadevi, S. Karthiga, V.K. Chandrasekar, D.V. Senthilkumar, M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 95(4), 042301 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Premraj, K. Suresh, K. Thamilmaran, Chaos 29(12), 123127 (2019)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Sathiyadevi, V.K. Chandrasekar, D.V. Senthilkumar, Phys. Rev. E 98(3), 032301 (2018)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Sathiyadevi, V.K. Chandrasekar, D.V. Senthilkumar, M. Lakshmanan, Front. Appl. Math. Stat. 4, 58 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Premraj, K. Suresh, T. Banerjee, K. Thamilmaran, Phys. Rev. E 98(2), 022206 (2018)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Maistrenko, B. Penkovsky, M. Rosenblum, Phys. Rev. E 89(6), 060901 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Rybalova, V.S. Anishchenko, G.I. Strelkova, A. Zakharova, Chaos 29(7), 071106 (2019)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Zhao, Z. Sun, W. Xu, Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–12 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Sathiyadevi, V.K. Chandrasekar, D.V. Senthilkumar, M. Lakshmanan, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 52(18), 184001 (2019)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Parastesh, S. Jafari, H. Azarnoush, Z. Shahriari, Z. Wang, S. Boccaletti, M. Perc, Phys. Rep. 898, 1–114 (2021)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Zakharova, M. Kapeller, E. Schöll, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 727, 010218 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Gopal, V.K. Chandrasekar, A. Venkatesan, M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 89(5), 052914 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J.H. Sheeba, V.K. Chandrasekar, M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 81(4), 046203 (2010)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Sathiyadevi, V.K. Chandrasekar, D.V. Senthilkumar, M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 97(3), 032207 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Mehrabbeik, F. Parastesh, J. Ramadoss, K. Rajagopal, H. Namazi, S. Jafari, Math. Biosci. Eng. 18(6), 9394–9409 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. Parastesh, M. Mehrabbeik, K. Rajagopal, S. Jafari, M. Perc, Chaos 32(1), 013125 (2022)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Z. Wei, F. Parastesh, H. Azarnoush, S. Jafari, D. Ghosh, M. Perc, M. Slavinec, Europhys. Lett. 123(4), 48003 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. B.K. Bera, S. Majhi, D. Ghosh, M. Perc, Europhys. Lett. 118(1), 10001 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Zou, D.V. Senthilkumar, R. Nagao, I.Z. Kiss, Y. Tang, A. Koseska, J. Kurths, Nat. Commun. 6(1), 1–9 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Banerjee, D. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. E 89(5), 052912 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Zou, D.V. Senthilkumar, J. Duan, J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 90(3), 032906 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Yanagita, T. Ichinomiya, Y. Oyama, Phys. Rev. E 72, 056218 (2005)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. T.V. Martins, V.N. Livina, A.P. Majtey, R. Toral, Phys. Rev. E 81, 041103 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. I. Leyva, I.S. na Nadal, J.A. Almendral, M.A.F. Sanjuán, Phys. Rev. E 74, 056112 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Astakhov, A. Gulai, N. Fujiwara, J. Kurths, Chaos 26, 023102 (2016)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Z. Levnajíc, Phys. Rev. E 84, 016231 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. E.M. Izhikevich, Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Myung, S. Hong, D. DeWoskin, E. De Schutter, D.B. Forger, T. Takumi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(29), E3920–E3929 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Soriano, M.R. Martínez, T. Tlusty, E. Moses, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(37), 13758–13763 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Yanagita, T. Ichinomiya, Y. Oyama, Phys. Rev. E 72(5), 056218 (2005)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Jiang, J. Wu, H. Yang, F. Xu, M. Wang, S. Huang, J. Zhang, Chin. J. Phys. 66, 172–179 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Q. Wang, G. Chen, M. Perc, PLoS One 6(1), e15851 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. N. Frolov, V. Maksimenko, S. Majhi, S. Rakshit, D. Ghosh, A. Hramov, Chaos 30(8), 081102 (2020)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Kundu, L. Sharma, M. Nandan, D. Ghosh, C. Hens, P. Pal, Chaos 29(1), 013112 (2019)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Dixit, M.D. Shrimali, Chaos 30(3), 033114 (2020)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Dixit, M.P. Asir, M.D. Shrimali, Chaos 30(12), 123112 (2020)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. D. Premraj, K. Manoj, S.A. Pawar, R.I. Sujith, Nonlinear Dyn. 103(2), 1439–1452 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  43. V. Sundarapandian, R. Karthikeyan, Int. J. Soft Comput. 6, 111–118 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. Vaidyanathan, A.T. Azar, K. Rajagopal, A. Sambas, S. Kacar, U. Cavusoglu, Int. J. Simul. Model. 13(3), 281–296 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. F. Nazarimehr, K. Rajagopal, J. Kengne, S.S. Jafari, V.T. Pham, Chaos Solitons Fractals 111, 108–118 (2018)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. K. Rajagopal, A. Akgul, S. Jafari, B. Aricioglu, Nonlinear Dyn. 91(2), 957–974 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  47. K. Rajagopal, S. Jafari, A. Karthikeyan, A. Srinivasan, B. Ayele, Circ. Syst. Signal Process. 37(9), 3702–3724 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Center for Nonlinear Systems, Chennai Institute of Technology, India, via funding number CIT/CNS/2022/RP-016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Artificial Intelligence, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600069, India

    Ramesh Ramamoorthy

  2. Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences and Arts, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia

    Salah Boulaaras & Asma Alharbi

  3. Centre for Computation Biology, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 069, India

    K. Sathiyadevi

Authors
  1. Ramesh Ramamoorthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salah Boulaaras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asma Alharbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Sathiyadevi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Sathiyadevi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramamoorthy, R., Boulaaras, S., Alharbi, A. et al. Impact of repulsive coupling in exhibiting distinct collective dynamical states. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 231, 4117–4122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00627-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00627-1

Search

Navigation