Abstract
The presence of a nonvanishing thermal gradient and/or a chemical potential gradient in a conducting medium can lead to an electric field—an effect known as thermoelectric effect or Seebeck effect. We discuss here the thermoelectric effects for hot and dense strongly interacting matter within the framework of relativistic Boltzmann equation in the relaxation time approximation. In the context of heavy-ion collisions, the Seebeck coefficients for the quark matter as well as for the hadronic matter are estimated within this approach. The quark matter is modeled by the two flavor Nambu–Jona–Lassinio (NJL) model and the hadronic medium is modeled by the hadron resonance gas (HRG) model with hadrons and their resonances up to a mass cutoff \({\tilde{\varLambda }}\sim 2.6\) GeV. For the estimation of thermoelectric transport coefficients, for the quark matter, we calculate the relaxation times for the quarks and antiquarks from the quark–quark and quark–antiquark scattering through meson exchange within the NJL model. On the other hand, for the hadronic medium, the relaxation times of hadrons and their resonances are estimated within a hard sphere scattering approximation. We also discuss the formalism of the thermoelectric effect in the presence of a nonvanishing external magnetic field. We give an estimation of the associated magneto-Seebeck coefficient and the Nernst coefficient for the hot and dense QCD matter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.W. Heinz, R. Snellings, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123–151 (2013)
P. Romatschke, U. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172301 (2007)
P.K. Kovtun, D.T. Son, A.O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005)
S. Gavin, Nucl. Phys. A 435, 826 (1985)
A. Hosoya, K. Kajantie, Nucl. Phys. B 250, 666 (1985)
A. Dobado, J.M. Torres-Rincon, Phys. Rev. D 86, 074021 (2012)
C. Sasaki, K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. C 79, 055207 (2009)
C. Sasaki, K. Redlich, Nucl. Phys. A 832, 62 (2010)
F. Karsch, D. Kharzeev, K. Tuchin, Phys. Lett. B 663, 217 (2008)
S.I. Finazzo, R. Rougemont, H. Marrochio, J. Noronha, JHEP 1502, 051 (2015)
A. Wiranata, M. Prakash, Nucl. Phys. A 830, 219C–222C (2009)
S. Jeon, L. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5799–5809 (1996)
P. Bozek, Phys. Rev. C 81, 034909 (2010)
J.-B. Rose, J.-F. Paquet, G.S. Denicol, M. Luzum, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, C. Gale, Nucl. Phys. A 931, 926 (2014)
D.E. Kharzeev, L.D. McLerran, H.J. Warringa, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008)
V. Skokov, AYu. Illarionov, V. Toneev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009)
H. Li, X. Sheng, Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 94, 044903, arXiv:1602.02223 (2016)
G. Inghirami, M. Mace, Y. Hirono, L.D. Zanna, D.E. Kharzeev, M. Bleicher, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 293, arXiv:1908.07605 (2020)
G. Inghirami et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 659 (2016)
A. Das, S.S. Dave, P.S. Saumia, A.M. Srivastava, Phys. Rev. C 96, 034902 (2017)
K. Tuchin, Phys. Rev. C 83, 017901 (2011)
K. Tuchin, Phys. Rev. C 82, 034904 (2010)
M. Greif, C. Greiner, G.S. Denicol, Phys. Rev. D 93(9), 096012 (2016)
M. Greif, I. Bouras, C. Greiner, Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094014 (2014)
A. Puglisi, S. Plumari, V. Greco, Phys. Rev. D 90, 114009 (2014)
W. Cassing, O. Linnyk, T. Steinert, V. Ozvenchuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 182301 (2013)
T. Steinert, W. Cassing, Phys. Rev. C 89, 035203 (2014)
G. Aarts, C. Allton, A. Amato, P. Giudice, S. Hands, J.-I. Skullerud, JHEP 02, 186 (2015)
G. Aarts, C. Allton, J. Foley, S. Hands, S. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022002 (2007)
A. Amato, G. Aarts, C. Allton, P. Giudice, S. Hands, J.-I. Skullerud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 172001 (2013)
S. Gupta, Phys. Lett. B 597, 57 (2004)
Y. Burnier, M. Laine, Eur. Phys. J. C. 72, 1902 (2012)
H.-T. Ding, A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, W. Soeldner, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034504 (2011)
O. Kaczmarek, M. Muller, PoS Lattice 2013, 175 (2014)
S.-X. Qin, Phys. Lett. B 742, 358 (2015)
R. Marty, E. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, J. Aichelin, H. Berrehrah, Phys. Rev. C 88, 045204 (2013)
D. Fernandez-Fraile, A.Gomez Nicola, Phys. Rev. D 73, 045025 (2006)
D. Kharzeev, K. Landsteiner, A. Schmitt, H. Yee (ed.), Strongly Interacting Matter in Magnetic Field. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 871 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013)
M. Greif, J.A. Fotakis, G.S. Denicol, C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 242301 (2018)
M. Prakash, M. Prakash, R. Venugopalan, G. Welke, Phys. Rept. 227, 321–366 (1993)
A. Wiranata, M. Prakash, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054908 (2012)
P. Chakraborty, J.I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 83, 014906 (2011)
A.S. Khvorostukhin, V.D. Toneev, D.N. Voskresensky, Nucl. Phys. A 845, 106 (2010)
S. Plumari, A. Paglisi, F. Scardina, V. Greco, Phys. Rev. C 86, 054902 (2012)
M.I. Gorenstein, M. Hauer, O.N. Moroz, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024911 (2008)
J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Noronha, C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 86, 024913 (2012)
S.K. Tiwari, P.K. Srivastava, C.P. Singh, Phys. Rev. C 85, 014908 (2012)
S. Ghosh, A. Lahiri, S. Majumder, R. Ray, S.K. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. C 88, 068201 (2013)
R. Lang, N. Kaiser, W. Weise, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 127 (2015)
S. Ghosh, G. Krein, S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. C 89, 045201 (2014)
A. Wiranata, V. Koch, M. Prakash, X.N. Wang, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 509, 012049 (2014)
A. Wiranata, M. Prakash, P. Chakraborty, Central. Eur. J. Phys. 10, 1349–1351 (2012)
A. Tawfik, M. Wahba, Ann. Phys. 522, 849–856 (2010)
J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Noronha, C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 172302 (2009)
G. Kadam, H. Mishra, Nucl. Phys. A 934, 133147 (2015)
G. Kadam, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30(10), 1550031 (2015)
G. Kadam, H. Mishra, L. Thakur, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114001 (2018)
S. Ghosh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1450054 (2014)
N. Demir, A. Wiranata, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 535, 012018 (2014)
S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. C 90, 025202 (2014)
J.-B. Rose, J.M. Torres-Rincon, A. Schafer, D.R. Oliinychenko, H. Petersen, Phys. Rev. C 97, 055204 (2018)
C. Wesp, A. El, F. Reining, Z. Xu, I. Bouras, C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054911 (2011)
S.A. Bass et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 225 (1998)
G. Kadam, H. Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 92, 035203 (2015)
R. K. Mohapatra, H. Mishra, S. Dash, B. K. Nandi, arXiv:1901.07238
P. Singha, A. Abhishek, G. Kadam, S. Ghosh, H. Mishra, J. Phys. G. 46, 015201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aaf256
A. Abhishek, H. Mishra, S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D 97, 014005 (2018)
J.R. Bhatt, A. Das, H. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014015 (2019)
A. Das, H. Mishra, R.K. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094031 (2019)
A. Das, H. Mishra, R.K. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114004 (2019)
A. Das, H. Mishra, R.K. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034027 (2020)
J. Dey, S. Satapathy, P. Murmu, S. Ghosh, arXiv:1907.11164
B. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 96, 036009 (2017)
G.S. Denicol, H. Niemi, I. Bouras, E. Molnar, Z. Xu, D.H. Rischke, C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074005 (2014)
J.I. Kapusta, J.M. Torres-Rincon, Phys. Rev. C 86, 054911 (2012)
H.B. Callen, Thermodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1960)
T.J. Scheidemantel, C. Ambrosch-Draxi, T. Thonhauser, J.V. Badding, J.O. Sofo, Phys. Rev. B 68, 125210 (2003)
P. Ao, cond-mat/9505002
M. Matusiak, K. Rogacki, T. Wolf, Phys. Rev. B 97, 220501(R) (2018)
M. K. Hooda, C. S. Yadav, arXiv:1704.07194
O. Cyr-Choiniere et al., Phys. Rev. X 7, 031042 (2017)
L.P. Gaudart, D. Berardan, J. Bobroff, N. Dragoe, Phys. Stat. Sol. (RRL) 2(4), 185–187 (2008)
S. Sergeenkov, JETP Lett. 67, 650–655 (1998)
K.P. Wojcik, I. Weymann, Phys. Rev. B 89, 165303 (2014)
M. Wysokinski, J. Spalek, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 163905 (2013)
Kangjun Seo, Sumanta Tewari, Phys. Rev. B 90, 174503 (2014)
P. Dutta, A. Saha, A.M. Jayannavar, Phys. Rev. B 96, 115404 (2017)
S. Kolenda, M.J. Wolf, D. Beckmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 097001 (2016)
M. Shahbazi, C. Bourbonnais, Phys. Rev. B 94, 195153 (2016)
A. Cantarero, F. X. Alvarez, in Thermoelectric Effects: Semiclassical and Quantum Approaches from the Boltzmann Transport Equation, ed. by X. Wang, Z. M. Wang. Lect. Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology, vol. 16. Nanoscale Thermoelectrics. https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/thermoelectric-effects-semiclassical-and-quantum-approaches-from/2030750
G.S. Nolas, J. Sharp, H.J. Goldsmid, Thermoelectrics: Basic Principles and New Materials Developments, vol. 45 (Springer, Berlin, 2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04569-5
A. Das, H. Mishra, R.K. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014030 (2020)
A. Abhishek, A. Das, D. Kumar, H. Mishra, arXiv:2007.14757
D. Dey, B. K. Patra, arXiv:2004.03149
He-Xia Zhang, arXiv:2004.08767
P. Singha, A. Abhishek, G. Kadam, S. Ghosh, H. Mishra, J. Phys. G 46, 015201 (2019)
A. Abhishek, H. Mishra, S. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D 97, 014005 (2018)
B. Singh, A. Abhishek, S.K. Das, H. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114019 (2019)
C. Ratti, M.A. Thaler, W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014019 (2006)
R. Wolfe, G.E. Smith, Phys. Rev. 129, 1086 (1963)
A.S. Khvorostukhin, V.D. Toneev, D.N. Voskresensky, Nucl. Phys. A 845, 106–146 (2010)
A.S. Khvorostukhin, V.D. Toneev, D.N. Voskresensky, Nucl. Phys. A 915, 158–169 (2013)
P. Zhuang, J. Hufner, S.P. Klevansky, L. Neise, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3728–3738 (1995)
M. Albright, J.I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 93(1), 014903 (2016)
S.R. De Groot, W.A. Van Leeuwen, C.G. Van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Applications (North-holland, Amsterdam, 1980)
C. Cercignani, G.M. Kremer, in The Relativistic Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Applications. Progress in Mathematical Physics book series, vol. 22 (PMP)
M. Asakawa, A. Majumder, B. Muller, Phys. Rev. C 81, 064912 (2010)
L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, Sect. 58 (Pergamon Press, NY, 1984)
J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 1999)
V. Roy, S. Pu, L. Rezzolla, D. Rischke, Phys. Lett. B 750, 45–52 (2015)
S.M.A. Tabatabaee, N. Sadooghi, Phys. Rev. D 96, 116008, arXiv:1705.00536 (2017)
M. Shokri, N. Sadooghi, J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 181, arXiv:1807.09487 (2018)
S.M.A. Tabatabaee, N. Sadooghi, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076022, arXiv:2003.01686 (2020)
Y. Hasegawa, T. Komine, Y. Ishikawa, A. Suzuki, H. Shirai, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 35 (2004)
P. Deb, G. Kadam, H. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094002 (2016)
M. Buballa, Phys. Rept. 407, 205–376 (2005)
P. Arnold, G.D. Moore, L. Yaffe, JHEP 11, 001 (2000)
M. Heffernan, S. Jeon, C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034906 (2020)
P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, arXiv:nucl-th/0304013
A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, Nucl. Phys. A 772, 167 (2006)
P. Braun-Munzinger, D. Magestro, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. B 518, 41 (2001)
K. Cleymans, Redlich, Phys. Rev. C 60, 054908 (1999)
F. Becattini et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 024901 (2001)
Cleymans, B. Kampfer, M. Kaneta, S. Wheaton, N. Xu, Phys. Rev. C 71, 054901 (2005)
A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. B 673, 14 (2009)
R. Dashen, S. Ma, H.J. Bernstein, Phys. Rev. 187, 345 (1969)
R. Dashen, R. Rajaraman, Phys. Rev. D 10, 694 (1974)
F. Karsch, K. Redlich, A. Tawfik, Phys. Lett. B 571, 67–74 (2003)
P. Braun-Munzinger, V. Koch, T. Schafer, J. Stachel, Phys. Rept. 621, 76 (2016)
M. Nahrgang, M. Bluhm, P. Alba, R. Bellwied, C. Ratti, Eur. Phys. J. C 75(12), 573 (2015)
A. Bhattacharyya, S. Das, S.K. Ghosh, R. Ray, S. Samanta, Phys. Rev. C 90(3), 034909 (2014)
P. Garg, D.K. Mishra, P.K. Netrakanti, B. Mohanty, A.K. Mohanty, B.K. Singh, N. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 726, 691–696 (2013)
A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D 86, 034509 (2012)
V.V. Begun, M.I. Gorenstein, M. Hauer, V.P. Konchakovski, O.S. Zozulya, Phys. Rev. C 74, 044903 (2006)
R.K. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. C 99, 024902 (2019)
D.H. Rischke, M.I. Gorenstein, H. Stocker, W. Greiner, Z. Phys. C 51, 485–489 (1991)
A. Majumder, B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252002 (2010)
P. Gondolo, G. Gelmini, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 145 (1991)
C. Amsler et al., [Particle Data Group], Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008)
M. Albright, J. Kapusta, C. Young, Phys. Rev. C 90(2), 024915 (2014)
P. Braun-Munzinger, I. Heppe, J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. B 465, 15 (1999)
J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, S. Wheaton, PRC 73, 034905 (2006)
X.G. Huang, M. Huang, D.H. Rischke, A. Sedrakian, Phys. Rev. D 81, 045015 (2010)
S. Y.F. Liu, Y. Yin, arXiv:2006.12421
M. Albright, in Thermodynamics of Hot Hadronic Gases at Finite Baryon Densities. https://inspirehep.net/literature/1444309
Acknowledgements
The idea of thermoelectric coefficient in the context of strongly interacting matter arose during a visit of one of the author’s (H.M.) to the research group of Prof. Ajit M. Srivastava at Institute of Physics Bhubaneswar. The authors would like to thank Prof. Ajit. M. Srivastava for originally suggesting the idea of thermoelectric coefficient in this context. The authors would like to thank Jitesh R. Bhatt, Ranjita K. Mohapatra, Aman Abhishek, and Deepak Kumar for useful discussions and collaboration in earlier investigations on this topic with the authors. The work of A.D. is supported by the Polish National Science Center Grants No. 2018/30/E/ ST2/00432.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Conservation of energy momentum tensor and baryon current in a quasiparticle approach
Appendix A: Conservation of energy momentum tensor and baryon current in a quasiparticle approach
Here, we show the conservation of energy momentum tensor and the baryon number conservation for quasiparticles. Similar calculation can also be performed for free particles. Let us note that the energy, momentum, and baryon number etc. are conserved during the collisions between the quasi particles—here, the constituent quarks. Let \(\chi _a\) be any such conserved quantity (e.g., baryon number, energy, momentum, etc.) associated with the particle \(`a'\). For any two body scattering, e.g., \(a+b\rightarrow c+d\) as considered here, we will have \(\chi _a+\chi _b=\chi _c+\chi _d\). It can be shown that for any conserved quantity \(\chi _a\), we have [106, 107, 147]:
where \({{{\mathcal {C}}}}_a\) is the collision integral in the Boltzmann equation and \(d\Gamma \equiv \gamma _g d^3 p/(2 \pi )^3\). \(\gamma _g\) is the degeneracy factor including color degree of freedom, flavor degree of freedom, and spin degree of freedom. Using the Boltzmann equation, the collision integral for the quasiparticle can be given by:
where \(\epsilon =\sqrt{\mathbf {p}^2+M^2}\) is single (quasi) particle energy which, in general, depends upon the mean field/the quark condensate. Here, we have not included the electromagnetic field contribution for simplicity, but can be included in general. Next, one can substitute the expression for \({{{\mathcal {C}}}}_a\) as given in Eq. (A.2) into Eq. (A.1) to simplify further. Of the two terms in \({{{\mathcal {C}}}}_a\), one can integrate by parts with respect to \(x^{\mu }\equiv (t,\mathbf {x})\) in the first term and with respect to \(\mathbf {p}\) in the second term after substituting in Eq. (A.1). After some manipulations, this leads to:
The baryonic current can be expressed as:
\(b^a\) is the baryon number and \(b^a =\pm 1\) for particles and antiparticles, respectively. Let us first discuss the conservation of baryon current. In Eq. (A.3), let \(\chi _a=b_a\), the baryon number. Then, all the derivatives of \(\chi _a\) vanish and we have from Eq. (A.3):
Next, we write down the energy momentum tensor in terms of the distribution functions and the mean fields as was done in Ref. [117] for the two flavor NJL model:
where V represents the vacuum energy density contribution from the mean fields or equivalently the constituent quark mass, that is:
Here, M is the consistent quark mass and G is the scalar coupling of the NJL model. To get the conservation of the energy momentum tensor, one can take \(\chi _a=\epsilon _a\) and \(\chi _a=p^i_a\) in Eq. (A.3) to write down the conservation equation of energy, and momentum, respectively, and can be combined to get energy momentum conservation equation as:
Next, let us note that from Eq. (A.7), we have:
Using the gap equation:
for the constituent quarks in the right-hand side of Eq. (A.9), we obtain:
Using Eq. (A.11) for the second term in Eq. (A.8), we have:
where we have used the definition of \(T^{\mu \nu }\) in terms of the microscopic distribution functions and mean field as given in Eq. (A.6). Equations (A.5) and (A.12) thus demonstrate the macroscopic current and energy momentum conservation, where \(J^\mu _b\) and \(T^{\mu \nu }\) defined in terms of microscopic distribution functions and mean fields. Furthermore, for free particles (in the absence of a medium-dependent mass), \(\partial _{\mu }\epsilon = 0\). Therefore, for free particles, Eq. (A.8) gives us the conservation of energy momentum tensor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, A., Mishra, H. Thermoelectric transport coefficients of hot and dense QCD matter. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 607–634 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00022-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00022-2