Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between decision changes under the study of random response (RR) using the logistic regression model

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the uni-variate logistic regression model and the multi-variate analyzes when response variables are reliant on random response and multi-variate logistic regression in the form of an RR design, which is something that we look at for the first time. The research is divided into two sections. In the first part, we employ a single variable to express binary RR response variables. This is done during the first step of the logistic regression model. This model is referred to as a generalized linear model, and our GLM has useful characteristics such as the features of parameter estimates derived from the GLM standard (GLM). The second section of a multivariate logistic regression model incorporates response variables as one of its components. Two components of the model that have not previously been discussed will be explained by providing it in the format of (GLM) before: 1- This model contains useful properties of standard GLM, such as Properties of parametric estimates. 2- Standard GLM application can be used to test this model. This research shows how Common settings are possible in R and GLIM software and this ensures that logistic regression models may be evaluated with confidence for RR response variables. Also included are random variables to aid in investigating the link between different aspects of an individual's RR response, as well as the multi-variate logistic regression model that we developed to help accomplish just that.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has associated data in a data repository. [Authors’ comment: The data will be available on request from the corresponding author.]

References

  1. S.L. Warner, Randomized-response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60, 63–69 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Zhang, C. Luo, Z. Zhao, Application of probabilistic method in maximum tsunami height prediction considering stochastic seabed topography. Nat Hazards (Dordrecht) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04283-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Zhang, Z. Pan, J. Yang, J. Chen, K. Chen, K. Yan, M. He, Study on the suppression mechanism of (NH4)2CO3 and SiC for polyethylene deflagration based on flame propagation and experimental analysis. Powder Technol. 399, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Chen, Q. Wang, J. Huang, X. Chen, Motorcycle ban and traffic safety: evidence from a quasi-experiment at Zhejiang, China. J. Adv. Transp. 2021, 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7552180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Shamsi, J. Manafian, S. Esmaeili, Ranking extreme efficient decision making units in stochastic DEA. Adv. Math. Models Appl. 7(2022), 38–43 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.G. Horvitz, B.V. Shah, W.R. Simmons, The unrelated question randomized response model. In: Proceedings of the social statistics section. American Statistical Association 65–72 (1967)

  7. J. Houston, A. Tran, A survey of tax evasion using the randomized response. Adv Tax 13, 69–94 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G.J.L.M. Lensvelt-Mulders, J.J. Hox, P.G.M. Van Der Heijden, How to improve the efficiency of randomised response designs? Qual. Quant. 39, 253–265 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Meng, A. Pang, X. Dong, C. Han, X. Sha, N. Jing, J. Na, H∞ optimal performance design of an unstable plant under bode integral constraint. Complexity (New York, N.Y.) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4942906

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Meng, D. Wang, P. Yang, G. Xie, R. Cutberto, C. Romero-Meléndez, Application of sum of squares method in nonlinear H∞ control for satellite attitude maneuvers. Complexity (New York, N.Y.) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5124108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M.J.L.F. Cruyff, A. Van Den Hout, P.G.M. Van Der Heijden, U. Böckenholt, Log-linear randomized-response models taking self-protective response behavior into account. Sociol Methods Res 36, 266–282 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M.J.L.F. Cruyff, U. Böckenholt, P.G.M. van der Heijden, L.E. Frank, Chapter 18 - a review of regression procedures for randomized response data including uni-variate and multi-variate logistic regression the proportional odds model and item response model and self-Protective responses. Handb Stat 34, 287–315 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O.A. Ilhan, J. Manafian, H.M. Baskonus, M. Lakestani, Solitary wave solitons to one model in the shallow water waves. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136(3), 258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01327-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Pourghanbar, J. Manafian, M. Ranjbar, A. Aliyeva, Y.S. Gasimov, An efficient alternating direction explicit method for solving a nonlinear partial differential equation. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 9647416 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9647416

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Shamsi, G.R. Jahanshahloo, M.R. Mozaffari, F.H. Lotfi, Centralized resource allocation with MOLP Structure. Indian J Sci Technol 7(9), 1297–1306 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2014/v7i9.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.W. Yu, G.L. Tian, M.L. Tang, Two new models for survey sampling with sensitive characteristic: design and analysis. Metrika 67, 251–263 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Shamspour, M. Yunesian, A. Fotouhi, B. Jann, A. Rahimi-Movaghar, F. Asghari, A.A. Akhlaghi, Estimating the prevalence of illicit drug use among students using thecrosswise model. Subst. Use Misuse 49, 1303–1310 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.H. Pier, F. Perrib, Estimating the proportion of non-heterosexuals in Taiwan using Christofides’ randomized response model: A comparison of different estimation methods. Soc. Sci. Res. 93, 102475 (January 2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Kost, O. Rheinbach, H. Schaebenb, Using logistic regression model selection towards interpretable machine learning in mineral prospectivity modeling. Geochemistry 81(4), 125826 (November 2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K.M. Ang, E.K. Seow, P.S. Fam, L.H. Cheng, Classification of edible bird’s nest samples using a logistic regression model through the mineral ratio approach. Food Control 137, 108921 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A.A.H. Ahmadini, A novel technique for parameter estimation in intuitionistic fuzzy logistic regression model. Ain Shams Eng. J. 13(1), 101518 (January 2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. G.F. Glonek, P. McCullagh, Multivariate Logistic Models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B: Methodol. 57, 533–546 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Jann, J. Jerke, I. Krumpal, Asking sensitive questions using the crosswise model: an experimental survey measuring plagiarism. Public Opin. Q. 76, 49–32 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B.G. Greenberg, A.L.A. Abul-Ela, W.R. Simmons, D.G. Horvitz, The unrelated question RR model: theoretical framework. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64, 520–539 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safdar Ghasami.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shamsi, R., Ghasami, S. Relationship between decision changes under the study of random response (RR) using the logistic regression model. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 956 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03088-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03088-6

Keywords

Navigation