Abstract
The purpose of this article is to discuss some aspects of the convergence analysis performed in the paper (Design of momentum fractional LMS for Hammerstein nonlinear system identification with application to electrically stimulated muscle model, Eur Phys J Plus 134: 407, 2019). It is highlighted that the way the authors prove convergence suffers a lack of correct and valid mathematical justifications.
References
N.I. Chaudary et al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 134, 407 (2019)
S. Zubair et al., Signal Process. 142, 441 (2018)
C.N. Ishtiaq, M.A.Z. Raja, A.R. Khan, Nonlinear Dyn. 82, 1811 (2015)
V.E. Tarasov, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 30, 1 (2016)
A.A. Kilbas, H.M. Srivastava, J.J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2016).
S. Khan et al., Nonlinear Dyn. 101, 1052 (2020)
A. Wahab, S. Khan, IEEET Neural Netw. Lear. 31, 1066 (2020)
N.J. Bershad, F. Wen, H.C. So, Signal Process. 133, 219 (2017)
Y. Wei et al., J. Franklin. Inst. 357, 2514 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wahab, A., Khan, S. & Khan, F.Z. Comments on “Design of momentum fractional LMS for Hammerstein nonlinear system identification with application to electrically stimulated muscle model”. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 1004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01482-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01482-0