Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction of a family of metric gravities

With highlights on conservation laws in metric formulations, consistency before dynamics, and a fresh view on the unity of Newtonian and Einsteinian gravity

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

A recent proposal by Shuler regarding a postulate-based derivation of a family of metrics describing the gravitational field outside a static spherically symmetric mass distribution is reviewed. All of Shuler’s gravities agree with the Schwarzschild solution in the weak-field limit, but they differ in the strong-field domain, i.e., close enough to a sufficiently compact source of the field. It is found that the evoked postulates of i) momentum conservation and ii) consistency of field strength measurement are satisfied in all metric theories of gravity compatible with the Einstein equivalence principle, no matter what the form of the metric. Therefore, they cannot be used, within any correct deduction, to derive a particular metric. Shuler’s derivations are based on an inconsistent set of correspondences between local and distant measurements. Furthermore, it is shown here that out of the family of possible metrics given by Shuler only one member, the Schwarzschild metric, satisfies a standard relativistic generalization of Newton’s law of gravitation, suggesting the others to be unphysical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Weinstein, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B 62, 98 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Kassner, Eur. J. Phys. 36, 065031 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Kassner, Adv. Stud. Theor. Phys. 11, 179 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Kassner, Am. J. Phys. 85, 619 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R.P. Gruber, R.H. Price, S.M. Matthews, W.R. Cordwell, L.F. Wagner, Am. J. Phys. 56, 265 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Sommerfeld, Electrodynamics: Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol. III (Academic Press, New York, 1952)

  7. L.I. Schiff, Am. J. Phys. 28, 340 (1960)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Rowlands, Phys. Edu. 32, 49 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R.R. Cuzinatto, B.M. Pimental, P.J. Pompeia, Am. J. Phys. 79, 662 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Rindler, Am. J. Phys. 36, 540 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. F.R. Tangherlini, Nuovo Cimento 25, 1081 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. W.M. Sacks, J.A. Ball, Am. J. Phys. 36, 240 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Rindler, Am. J. Phys. 37, 72 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Dadhich, Curr. Sci. 109, 260 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Mueller, F. Grave, arXiv:0904.4184v3 [gr-qc] (2010)

  16. T. Jacobson, Class. Quantum. Grav. 24, 5717 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Shuler, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 158 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. . Grøn, S. Hervik, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity: With Modern Applications in Cosmology (Springer Science & Business Media, Springer, Berlin, 2007)

  19. E.F. Bunn, D.W. Hogg, Am. J. Phys. 77, 688 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. T.M. Davis, C.H. Lineweaver, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austr. 21, 97 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Schwarzschild, Sitzungsber. K. Preu. Akad. Wissensch., 189 (1916) (English translation: On the Gravitational Field of a Mass Point According to Einstein’s Theory, S. Antoci, A. Loinger, arXiv:physics/9905030v1)

  22. P. Painleve, C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 173, 677 (1921)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Gullstrand, Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. 16, 1 (1922)

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Harvey, E. Schucking, E.J. Surowitz, Am. J. Phys. 74, 1017 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Rindler, Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001)

  26. L.B. Okun’, K.G. Selvanov, V.L. Telegdi, Phys. -- Usp. 42, 1045 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J.C. Baez, E.F. Bunn, Am. J. Phys. 73, 644 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Brans, R.H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. J.M. Weisberg, D.J. Nice, J.H. Taylor, Astrophys. J. 722, 1030 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. B.P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. B.P. Abbott, arXiv:1811.12907v2 [astro-ph.HE] (2018)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Kassner.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kassner, K. Reduction of a family of metric gravities. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 366 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12722-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12722-y

Navigation