Skip to main content

Restricting microplastics in the European Union: Process and criteria under REACH


As part of the EU Plastics Strategy, the European Commission has initiated the restriction process regarding intentionally added microplastics under REACH (acronym of the EU chemical regulation). A restriction dossier is compiled by ECHA according the provisions of REACH. Not only environmental and health risk assessments have to be made, but a large part of the dossier concerns socio-economic analyses and evaluations of risk management options, in order to justify a Union-wide restriction. The procedure reflects the multiple objectives of REACH: protection of human health and the environment, but also the functioning of the internal market. Although the precautionary principle is incorporated in REACH, it plays a less than subordinate role. The process of restriction offers interested parties the possibility to present information and evidence. For the restriction dossier on microplastics is of utmost importance that all available evidence is provided. When less data is available, restriction seems to be less likely.


  1. Council Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 on the Registration, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) [2006] OJ L 33/1

  2. European Commission, Note for the attention of Mr G. Dancet, Executive Director, ECHA, 9 November 2017, Ref. Ares (2017) 5463573

  3. EC, Intentionally added microplastics in products: final report (European Commission, Brussels, 2017)

  4. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy, SWD (2018) 16 final, COM (2018) 28 final 16 January 2008

  5. EU Survey, Investigating options for reducing releases in the aquatic environment of microplastics emitted by (but not intentionally added in) products,

  6. C.M. Rochman, A.M. Cook, A.A. Koelmans, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35, 1617 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Fisher, J. Risk Res. 11, 541 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Regulation 1272/2008/EC of 16 December 2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, [2008] OJ L353/1

  9. L. Bergkamp, The European Union REACH Regulation for Chemicals: Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)

  10. E. Fisher, Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 23, 163 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. OECD, Data analysis of the identification of correlations between polymer characteristics and potential for health or ecotoxicological concern (OECD, Paris, 2009)

  12. Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products OJ L342/59 (Cosmetics Regulation)

  13. ECHA, Committee for Risk Assessment,

  14. Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (1999/468/EC) OJ L 184, Articles 5a and 7

  15. ECHA, Call for evidence on the use of intentionally added microplastic particles in products of any kind, 1 March 2018,

  16. ECHA, Guidance for the preparation of an Annex XV dossier for restrictions (ECHA, 2007)

  17. ECHA, Addendum to the guidance on Annex XV for restrictions and the guidance on socio-economic analysis (SEA) -- restrictions, Format of Annex XV restriction report, Version 2.1, 17 May 2016

  18. A.J. Verschoor, Towards a Definition of Microplastics - Considerations for the Specification of Physico-Chemical Properties (RIVM, 2015)

  19. Loi n$^{\circ}$ 2016-1087 du 8 aot 2016 pour la reconquête de la biodiversité, de la nature et des paysages, TA n$^{\circ}$ 803,, Translation provided by Isaure Simonin, student of the Leiden Advocacy Project on Plastic

  20. H.H.R. 1321 ---Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015, 114th Congress (2015--2016),

  21. H.A. Leslie, Review of Microplastics in Cosmetics (IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, 2014)

  22. UNEP, Plastic in Cosmetics: Are we Polluting the Environment through our Personal Care? (UNEP, 2015)

  23. Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Acrylates Copolymer and 33 Related Cosmetic Ingredients, in International Journal of Toxicology, Vol. 21 (Suppl. 3), 1 (2002)

  24. EU, Cosing,

  25. T. Gouin et al., SOFW J. 141, 40 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. UNEP, Draft resolution on marine litter and microplastics, 5 December 2017, UNEP/EA.3/L.20

  27. A.L. Andrady, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 1596 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Lambert, M. Wagner, in Freshwater Microplastics: Emerging Environmental Contaminants?, edited by M. Wagner, S. Lambert (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018)

  29. P.K. Cheung, L. Fok, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 109, 582 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. EFTA, Case E-9/2016

  31. S. Vaughan, EU chemicals regulation: new governance, hybridity and REACH (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England, 2015)

  32. Look for the Zero,

  33. P. Birnie, A. Boyle, C. Redgwell, International law and the environment (OUP, Oxford, 2009)

  34. C. Calliess, H. Stockhaus, J. Eur. Environ. Plan. Law 9, 113 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Kentin.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kentin, E. Restricting microplastics in the European Union: Process and criteria under REACH. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 425 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: