Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between hydraulic and structural based anti-vortex methods at intakes

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Surface vortices are the main reason of flow instability and entraining air and debris into the intakes. Using structural based anti-vortex facilities is a common method for dissipating vortices over the intakes. In the present experimental study, performance of a new hydraulic based anti-vortex method is compared with available structural based anti-vortex methods over the horizontal intakes. In the new approach dynamically high-risk surface vortices are eliminated by imposing a hydraulic jet at the formed vortex zone over the intake. The injected jet acts as a point source of external momentum in order to change the hydrodynamic condition of the formed vortex flow. Results show that the investigated hydraulic based anti-vortex device is more flexible and more hydraulically efficient than the structural based anti-vortex methods, especially when the intake Froude number is higher than 1.3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Suerich-Gulick, S.J. Gaskin, M. Villeneuve, É. Parkinson, J. Hydraul. Eng. 140, 291 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Möller, M. Detert, R.M. Boes, J. Hydraul. Eng. 141 (2015) DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001036

  3. J. Knauss (Editor), Swirling Flow Problems at Intakes: Hydraulic Structures Design Manual (Taylor & Francis, 1987)

  4. H. Sarkardeh, A.R. Zarrati, R. Roshan, J. Hydraul. Res. 48, 108 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Suerich-Gulick, S.J. Gaskin, M. Villeneuve, É. Parkinson, J. Hydraul. Res. 52, 502 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W.J.M. Rankine, Manual of Applied Mechanics (C. Griffen Co., London, England, 1858)

  7. M. Ansar, T. Nakato, J. Hydraul. Eng. 127, 825 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Echavez, E. Mccann, J. Exp. Fluids 33, 414 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Sarkardeh, A.R. Zarrati, R. Roshan, J. Hydraul. Res. 48, 108 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Sarkardeh, A.R. Zarrati, E. Jabbari, R. Roshan, J. Hydraul. Eng. 137, 701 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Sarkardeh, E. Jabbari, A.R. Zarrati, S. Tavakkol, J. Water Manag. 164, 193 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Roshan, H. Sarkardeh, A.R. Zarrati, Vortex Study on Hydraulic Model of Godar-e-Landar Dam and Hydropower Plant, in 5th International Conference on Computational and Experimental Methods in Multiphase and Complex Flow, Vol. 63 (WIT Press, 2009) pp. 217--225 DOI:10.2495/MPF090191

  13. S.R. Khodashenas, R. Roshan, H. Sarkardeh, H.Md Azamathulla, Dam Eng. XXI, 131 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.M. Taghvaei, R. Roshan, Kh. Safavi, H. Sarkardeh, Int. J. Phys. Sci. 7, 5069 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Azarpira, H. Sarkardeh, S. Tavakkol, R. Roshan, H. Bakhshi, Sadhana 39, 1201 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.R. Khanarmuei, H. Rahimzadeh, H. Sarkardeh, Modares Mech. Eng. 14, 35 (2014) (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.R. Khanarmuei, H. Rahimzadeh, A.R. Kakuei, H. Sarkardeh, Sadhana 41, 1055 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Sarkardeh, Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 30, 1017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Sarkardeh, A.R. Zarrati, E. Jabbari, M. Marosi, J. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 8, 598 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Suerich-Gulick, S.J. Gaskin, M. Villeneuve, É. Parkinson, J. Hydraul. Res. 52, 513 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Khadem-Rabe, S.H. Ghoreishi-Najafi, H. Sarkardeh, Numerical simulation of anti-vortex devices at water intakes, in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management (ICE, 2016)

  22. B. Khadem Rabe, S.H. Ghoreishi Najafabadi, H. Sarkardeh, J. Curr. Sci. 112, 435 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Sarkardeh, Meccanica (2017) DOI:10.1007/s11012-017-0687-0

  24. R. Carriveau, G. Kopp, R. Baddour, J. Hydraul. Res. 47, 486 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S.M. Borghei, A.R. Kabiri-Samani, Sci. Iran. 17, 89 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Trivellato, J. Opt. Lasers Eng. 48, 589 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C.H. Sohn, N.G. Ju, B.H.L. Gowda, J. Visual. 12, 347 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M.N. Mahyari, H. Karimi, H. Naseh, M. Mirshams, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 24, 1997 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S.M. Amiri, A.R. Zarrati, R. Roshan, H. Sarkardeh, J. Water Manag. 164, 193 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Y.K. Wang, C.B. Jiang, D.F. Liang, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 799 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Tahershamsi, H. Rahimzadeh, M. Monshizadeh, Vortex prevention in intakes using vertical walls, in 4th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structure, Portugal (2012)

  32. J.S. Guilliver, A.J. Rindels, J. Hydraul. Eng. 113, 1101 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Suerich-Gulick, S.J. Gaskin, M. Villeneuve, É. Parkinson, J. Hydraul. Res. 52, 513 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. L.R. Daggett, G.H. Keulegan, J. Hydraul. Eng. 100, 561 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Padmanabhan, G.E. Hecker, J. Hydraul. Div. 110, 1540 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J.A. Odgaard, J. Hydraul. Eng. 112, 610 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Tahershamsi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monshizadeh, M., Tahershamsi, A., Rahimzadeh, H. et al. Comparison between hydraulic and structural based anti-vortex methods at intakes. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 329 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11608-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11608-4

Navigation