Skip to main content
Log in

Bi-model processing for early detection of breast tumor in CAD system

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Early screening of skeptical masses in mammograms may reduce mortality rate among women. This rate can be further reduced upon developing the computer-aided diagnosis system with decrease in false assumptions in medical informatics. This method highlights the early tumor detection in digitized mammograms. For improving the performance of this system, a novel bi-model processing algorithm is introduced. It divides the region of interest into two parts, the first one is called pre-segmented region (breast parenchyma) and other is the post-segmented region (suspicious region). This system follows the scheme of the preprocessing technique of contrast enhancement that can be utilized to segment and extract the desired feature of the given mammogram. In the next phase, a hybrid feature block is presented to show the effective performance of computer-aided diagnosis. In order to assess the effectiveness of the proposed method, a database provided by the society of mammographic images is tested. Our experimental outcomes on this database exhibit the usefulness and robustness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Jalalian, S.B. Mashohor, H.R. Mahmud, M.I.B. Saripan, A.R.B. Ramli, B. Karasfi, Clin. Imag. 37, 420 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C.E. DeSantis, F. Bray, J. Ferlay, J. Lortet-Tieulent, B.O. Anderson, A. Jemal, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prevent. 24, 1495 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.M.M. Eltoukhy, I. Faye, B.B. Samir, Using curvelet transform to detect breast cancer in digital mammogram, in 2009 5th International Colloquium on Signal Processing Its Applications (IEEE, 2009) pp. 340-345

  4. Z. Mahmood, N. Muhammad, N. Bibi, T. Ali, Fractals 25, 1750025 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Muhammad, N. Bibi, A. Jahangir, Z. Mahmood, Pattern Anal. Appl. (2017) DOI:10.1007/s10044-017-0617-8

  6. M. Roopaei, M.K. Eghbal, M. Shadaram, S. Agaian, Electron. Imag. 2016, 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Muhammad, N. Bibi, Z. Mahmood, D.-G. Kim, SpringerPlus 4, 832 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y.M.Y. Abdallah, A. Hayder, E. Wagiallah, Methods 7, 8 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Sridhar, K. Reddy, A.M. Prasad, Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Tech. 17, 341 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Zeng, L. Liu, Contrast enhancement of mammographic images using guided image filtering, in IGTA 2013: Advances in Image and Graphics Technologies (Springer, 2013) pp. 300-306

  11. S. Bedi, R. Khandelwal, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2, 1605 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. O'Connor, P. Tofts, K. Miles, L. Parkes, G. Thompson, A. Jackson, Br. J. Radiol. 84, S112-20 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. I.K. Maitra, S. Nag, S.K. Bandyopadhyay, Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 107, 175 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Sundaram, K. Ramar, N. Arumugam, G. Prabin, Histogram based contrast enhancement for mammogram images, in 2011 International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Computing and Networking Technologies (IEEE, 2011) pp. 842-846

  15. S. Mohan, M. Ravishankar, Modified contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization based on local contrast enhancement for mammogram images in Mobile Communication and Power Engineering (Springer, 2013) pp. 397-403

  16. S. Mohan, T. Mahesh, Particle Swarm Optimization based Contrast Limited enhancement for mammogram images, in 2013 7th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO) (IEEE, 2013) pp. 384-388

  17. V. Bhateja, M. Misra, S. Urooj, A. Lay-Ekuakille, Improved Non-Linear Polynomial Filters for Contrast Enhancement of Breast Tumors, in Proceedings of First International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems: Volume 2 - Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 51 (Springer, 2016) pp. 461-468

  18. T.K. Agarwal, M. Tiwari, S.S. Lamba, Modified histogram based contrast enhancement using homomorphic filtering for medical images, in 2014 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC) (IEEE, 2014) pp. 964-968

  19. Q. Song, L. Ma, J. Cao, X. Han, Image Denoising Based on Mean Filter and Wavelet Transform, in 2015 4th International Conference on Advanced Information Technology and Sensor Application (AITS) (IEEE, 2015) pp. 39-42

  20. H. Cheng, J. Shan, W. Ju, Y. Guo, L. Zhang, Pattern Recogn. 43, 299 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. V. Bhateja, M. Misra, S. Urooj, Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 129, 125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D.M. Catarious Jr, A.H. Baydush, C.E. Floyd Jr, Med. Phys. 31, 1512 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M.A. Kupinski, M.L. Giger, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 17, 510 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Zheng, Y.-H. Chang, D. Gur, Acad. Radiol. 2, 959 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Song, Y. Lv, B. Yang, Y. Wang, Segmentation of breast masses using adaptive region growing, in 2013 8th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST) (IEEE, 2013) pp. 77-81

  26. G.M. Te Brake, N. Karssemeijer, Med. Phys. 28, 259 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S.D. Tzikopoulos, M.E. Mavroforakis, H.V. Georgiou, N. Dimitropoulos, S. Theodoridis, Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 102, 47 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Singh, A.G. Mohapatra, G. Kanungo, Int. J. Comput. Appl. 22, 0975 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. H.M. Moftah, A.T. Azar, E.T. Al-Shammari, N.I. Ghali, A.E. Hassanien, M. Shoman, Neural Comput. Appl. 24, 1917 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Srivastava, N. Sharma, S.K. Singh, R. Srivastava, Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Technol. 13, 270 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Hanmandlu, A.A. Khan, A. Saha, A novel algorithm for pectoral muscle removal and auto-cropping of neoplasmic area from mammograms, in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (IEEE, 2012) pp. 1-5

  32. K.S. Camilus, V. Govindan, P. Sathidevi, J. Digit. Imag. 23, 562 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Arneodo, N. Decoster, P. Kestener, S. Roux, Adv. Imag. Electron Phys. 126, 1 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. P. Kestener, J.M. Lina, P. Saint-Jean, A. Arneodo, Image Anal. Stereol. 20, 169 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. K.A. Batchelder, A.B. Tanenbaum, S. Albert, L. Guimond, P. Kestener, A. Arneodo, A. Khalil, PLoS ONE 9, e107580 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. E. Gerasimova-Chechkina, B. Toner, Z. Marin, B. Audit, S.G. Roux, F. Argoul, A. Khalil, O. Gileva, O. Naimark, A. Arneodo, Front. Physiol. 7, 336 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. E. Gerasimova-Chechkina, B. Toner, Z. Marin, B. Audit, S. Roux, F. Argoul, A. Khalil, O. Gileva, O. Naimark, A. Arneodo, AIP Conf. Proc. 1760, 020018 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M.M. Eltoukhy, I. Faye, B.B. Samir, Comput. Med. Imag. Graph. 34, 269 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. N. Muhammad, N. Bibi, I. Qasim, A. Jahangir, Z. Mahmood, Pattern Anal. Appl. (2017) DOI:10.1007/s10044-017-0613-z

  40. M. Nazeer, B. Nargis, Y.M. Malik, D.-G. Kim, arXiv:1302.3702 (2013)

  41. N. Muhammad, N. Bibi, IET Image Process. 9, 795 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. S.I. Niwas, P. Palanisamy, K. Sujathan, E. Bengtsson, Signal Process. 93, 2828 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. B. Chaudhury, M. Zhou, D.B. Goldgof, L.O. Hall, R.A. Gatenby, R.J. Gillies, J.S. Drukteinis, Proc. SPIE 9414, 941415 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Singh, V. Kumar, H.K. Verma, D. Singh, SVM Based System for classification of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammograms, in 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE, 2006) pp. 4747-4750

  45. S.-C. Tai, Z.-S. Chen, W.-T. Tsai, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 18, 618 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. H.A.M. Sakim, N.M. Salleh, N.H. Othman, Neural Network Inputs Selection for Breast Cancer Cells Classification, in New Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies, Vol. 199: Studies in Computational Intelligence (Springer, 2009) pp. 1-11

  47. M.F. Akay, Expert syst. applicat. 36, 3240 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. R. Bryll, R. Gutierrez-Osuna, F. Quek, Pattern Recogn. 36, 1291 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. D. Thakur, N. Markandaiah, D. Raj, Re optimization of ID3 and C4. 5 decision tree, in 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT) (IEEE, 2010) pp. 448-450

  50. C. Gallego-Ortiz, A.L. Martel, Proc. SPIE 9035, 90351Z (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. S.D. Desai, G. Megha, B. Avinash, K. Sudhanva, S. Rasiya, K. Linganagouda, Detection of microcalcification in digital mammograms by improved-MMGW segmentation algorithm, in 2013 International Conference on Cloud Ubiquitous Computing Emerging Technologies (IEEE, 2013) pp. 213-218

  52. A. Bria, N. Karssemeijer, F. Tortorella, Med. Image Anal. 18, 241 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. D. Saraswathi, E. Srinivasan, Int. J. Biomed. Eng. Technol. 15, 243 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. X.-Z. Li, S. Williams, M.J. Bottema, Pattern Recogn. Lett. 34, 1053 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. L. Nanni, S. Brahnam, A. Lumini, Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 1968 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. G.B. Junior, S.V. da Rocha, M. Gattass, A.C. Silva, A.C. de Paiva, Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 7534 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. C.C. Diaz-Huerta, E.M. Felipe-Riveron, L.M. Montaño-Zetina, Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 7361 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. J.Y. Choi, D.H. Kim, K.N. Plataniotis, Y.M. Ro, Expert Syst. Appl. 46, 106 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. B.I. Reporting, Data system, in Breast Imaging Atlas, 4th edition (American College of Radiology, Reston, 2003)

  60. J. Shi, J. Malik, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 22, 888 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Y. Zhang, N. Tomuro, J. Furst, D.S. Raicu, Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 7, 323 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. F. Saki, A. Tahmasbi, H. Soltanian-Zadeh, S.B. Shokouhi, Comput. Biol. Med. 43, 32 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. A. Tiedeu, C. Daul, A. Kentsop, P. Graebling, D. Wolf, Digit. Signal Process. 22, 124 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. M. Elangeeran, S. Ramasamy, K. Arumugam, A novel method for benign and malignant characterization of mammographic microcalcifications employing waveatom features and circular complex valued---Extreme Learning Machine, in 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP) (IEEE, 2014) pp. 1-6

  65. R. Rouhi, M. Jafari, S. Kasaei, P. Keshavarzian, Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 990 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. X. Liu, J. Tang, Syst. J. IEEE 8, 910 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. N. Gedik, A. Atasoy, Y. Sevim, Appl. Soft Comput. 43, 546 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Z. Wang, Q. Qu, G. Yu, Y. Kang, Neural Comput. Appl. 27, 227 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. N.S. Tabalvandani, K. Faez, Multiple classifier systems for breast mass classification, in 2014 22nd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) (IEEE, 2014) pp. 1085-1090

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazeer Muhammad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mughal, B., Sharif, M. & Muhammad, N. Bi-model processing for early detection of breast tumor in CAD system. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 266 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11523-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11523-8

Navigation