Skip to main content
Log in

Annotation and retrieval in protein interaction databases

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological databases have been developed with a special focus on the efficient retrieval of single records or the efficient computation of specialized bioinformatics algorithms against the overall database, such as in sequence alignment. The continuos production of biological knowledge spread on several biological databases and ontologies, such as Gene Ontology, and the availability of efficient techniques to handle such knowledge, such as annotation and semantic similarity measures, enable the development on novel bioinformatics applications that explicitly use and integrate such knowledge. After introducing the annotation process and the main semantic similarity measures, this paper shows how annotations and semantic similarity can be exploited to improve the extraction and analysis of biologically relevant data from protein interaction databases. As case studies, the paper presents two novel software tools, OntoPIN and CytoSeVis, both based on the use of Gene Ontology annotations, for the advanced querying of protein interaction databases and for the enhanced visualization of protein interaction networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mario Cannataro, Pietro Hiram Guzzi, Giuseppe Tradigo, Pierangelo Veltri, Biological Databases, in Springer Handbook of Bio-/Neuro-Informatics, edited by Nikola Kasabov (Springer-Verlag, 2014) pp. 431–440 ISBN 978-3-642-30573-3.

  2. Mario Cannataro, Pietro Hiram Guzzi, Data Management of Protein Interaction Networks (Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press, USA, 2011) ISBN-10: 0470770406, ISBN-13: 978-0470770405.

  3. Tero Aittokallio, Benno Schwikowski, Brief. Bioinform. 7, 243 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Evelyn Camon, Michele Magrane, Daniel Barrell, Vivian Lee, Emily Dimmer, John Maslen, David Binns, Nicola Harte, Rodrigo Lopez, Rolf Apweiler, Nucl. Acids Res. 32, D262 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Cannataro, P.H. Guzzi, P. Veltri, ACM Comput. Surv. 43, 1 (2010) 10.1145/1824795.1824796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Ciriello, M. Mina, P.H. Guzzi, M. Cannataro, C. Guerra, PloS ONE 7, e38107 (2012) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038107.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mario Cannataro, Pietro H. Guzzi, Pierangelo Veltri, ACM Comput. Surv. 43, (2010).

  8. Pietro H. Guzzi, Marco Mina, Concettina Guerra, Mario Cannataro, Brief. Bioinform. 13, 569 (2012) DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lukasz Salwinski, Christopher S. Miller, Adam J. Smith, Frank K. Pettit, James U. Bowie, David Eisenberg, Nucl. Acids Res. 32, D449 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mario Cannataro, Pietro H. Guzzi, Pierangelo Veltri, Using ontologies for annotating and retrieving protein-protein interactions data, in Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS 2009) (IEEE Press, 2009) pp. 1–5.

  11. Evelyn Camon, Michele Magrane, Daniel Barrell, Vivian Lee, Emily Dimmer, John Maslen, David Binns, Nicola Harte, Rodrigo Lopez, Rolf Apweiler, Nucl. Acids Res. 32, D262 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pietro H. Guzzi, Mario Cannataro, EMBnet J. 18, 32 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paul Shannon, Andrew Markiel, Owen Ozier, Nitin S. Baliga, Jonathan T. Wang, Daniel Ramage, Nada Amin, Benno Schwikowski, Trey Ideker, Genome Res. 13, 2498 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Aranda, P. Achuthan, Y. Alam-Faruque, I. Armean, A. Bridge, C. Derow, M. Feuermann, A.T. Ghanbarian, S. Kerrien, J. Khadake, J. Kerssemakers, C. Leroy, M. Menden, M. Michaut, L. Montecchi-Palazzi, S.N. Neuhauser, S. Orchard, V. Perreau, B. Roechert, K. van Eijk, H. Hermjakob, Nucl. Acids Res. 38, gkp878 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Zanzoni, L. Montecchi-Palazzi, M. Quondam, G. Ausiello, M. Helmer-Citterich, G. Cesareni, FEBS Lett. 513, 135 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Vlkel, P. Le Faou, P.O. Angrand, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 883 (2010) DOI: 10.1042/BST0380883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Allison Doerr, Nature Methods 10, 38 (2013) DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bioproximity web cite, www.bioproximity.com.

  19. E.D. Levy, J.B. Pereira-Leal, C. Chothia, S.A. Teichmann, PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e155 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Pu, J. Wong, B. Turner, E. Cho, S.J. Wodak, Nucl. Acids Res. 37, 825 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Louis du Plessis, Nives Skunca, Christophe Dessimoz, Brief. Bioinform. 12, 723 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Catia Pesquita, Daniel Faria, Andr O. Falco, Phillip Lord, Francisco M. Couto, PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, 07 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pietro H. Guzzi, Marco Mina, Concettina Guerra, Mario Cannataro, Brief. Bioinform. 13, 569 (2012) DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Philip Resnik, Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy, in IJCAI, pages 448–453.

  25. Dekang Lin, An information-theoretic definition of similarity, in ICML, edited by Jude W. Shavlik, Jude W. Shavlik, (Morgan Kaufmann, 1998) pp. 296–304.

  26. J.J. Jiang, D.W. Conrath, Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy, in International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics (ROCLING X) (1997) p. 9008.

  27. Mihail Popescu, James M. Keller, Joyce A. Mitchell, IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 3, 263 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guangchuang Yu, Fei Li, Yide Qin, Xiaochen Bo, Yibo Wu, Shengqi Wang, Bioinformatics 26, btq064 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Y.R. Cho, M. Mina, Y. Lu, N. Kwon, P.H. Guzzi, Proteome Sci. 11, S3 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Da Wei Huang, Brad T. Sherman, Richard A. Lempicki, Nucl. Acids Res. 37, 113 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Erdös, A. Rényi, Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5, 17 (1960).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, Reka Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Albert-László Barabási, Science 325, 412 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. N. Przulj, D. Higham, J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 711 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. George Michailidis, Data visualization through their graph representations (2008) pp. 103–120.

  36. Georgios Pavlopoulos, Anna L. Wegener, Reinhard Schneider, BioData Mining 1, 12 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Matthew Suderman, Michael Hallett, Bioinformatics 23, 2651 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Giuseppe Agapito, Pietro H. Guzzi, Mario Cannataro, BMC Bioinform. 14, S1 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kevin R. Brown, David Otasek, Muhammad Ali, Michael J. McGuffin, Wing Xie, Baiju Devani, Ian Lawson van Toch, Jurisica Igor, Bioinformatics 25, 3327 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Maere, K. Heymans, M. Kuiper, Bioinformatics 21, 3448 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. O. Garcia, C. Saveanu, M. Cline, M. Fromont-Racine, A. Jacquier, B. Schwikowski, T. Aittokallio, Bioinformatics 23, 394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Cannataro.

Additional information

Contribution to the Focus Point on “Pattern Recognition Tools for Proteomics” edited by V. Cantoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cannataro, M., Hiram Guzzi, P. & Veltri, P. Annotation and retrieval in protein interaction databases. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2014-14135-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2014-14135-x

Keywords

Navigation