Simulations: The dark side

Regular Article

Abstract

This paper discusses the Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics methods. Both methods are, in principle, simple. However, simple does not mean risk-free. In the literature, many of the pitfalls in the field are mentioned, but usually as a footnote --and these footnotes are scattered over many papers. The present paper focuses on the “dark side” of simulation: it is one big footnote. I should stress that “dark”, in this context, has no negative moral implication. It just means: under-exposed.

References

  1. 1.
    B.J. Alder, T.E. Wainwright, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1208 (1957)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.W. Wood, J.D. Jacobson, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1207 (1957)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.P. Landau, K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, Second edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.J. Mandell, J. Stat. Phys. 15, 299 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Parrinello, A. Rahman, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Najafabadi, S. Yip, Scripta Metall. 17, 1199 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Filion, M. Marechal, B. van Oorschot, D. Pelt, F. Smallenburg, M. Dijkstra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 188302 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.P. Allen, A.J. Masters, Mol. Phys. 79, 277 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.P. Allen, Phys. Rev. E 47, 4611 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Binder, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1699 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Angioletti-Uberti, M. Ceriotti, P.D. Lee, M.W. Finnis, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125416 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K.S. Shing, K.E. Gubbins, Mol. Phys. 49, 1121 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.H. Bennett, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 245 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Pronk, D. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. B 105, 6722 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N.B. Wilding, P. Sollich, A Monte Carlo method for chemical potential determination in single and multiple occupancy crystals, arXiv:1209.3228 (2012)
  16. 16.
    F. Smallenburg, L. Filion, M. Marechal, M. Dijkstra, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17886 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Frenkel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17728 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B.M. Mladek, P. Charbonneau, D. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 235702 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.M. Tai, Diabetes Care 17, 152 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G.O. Roberts, A. Gelman, W.R. Gilks, Ann. Appl. Prob. 7, 110 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.W. Lees, S.F. Edwards, J. Phys. C 5, 1921 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations