Skip to main content
Log in

The Sudakov veto algorithm reloaded

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We perform a careful analysis of the main Monte Carlo algorithm used in parton shower simulations, the Sudakov veto algorithm. We prove a general version of the algorithm, directly including the dependence on the infrared cutoff. Taking this as a starting point, we then consider non-positive definite splitting kernels, as encountered when dealing with sub-leading colour correlations or splitting kernels beyond leading order. New algorithms suited for these situations are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Bähr et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 639 (2008) arXiv:0803.0883.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, P. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008) arXiv:0710.3820.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Gleisberg et al., JHEP 02, 007 (2009) arXiv:0811.4622.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M.H. Seymour, Comput. Phys. Commun. 90, 95 (1995) arXiv:hep-ph/9410414.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Bengtsson, T. Sjostrand, Phys. Lett. B 185, 435 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Bengtsson, T. Sjostrand, Nucl. Phys. B 289, 810 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Norrbin, T. Sjöstrand, Nucl. Phys. B 603, 297 (2001) arXiv:hep-ph/0010012.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Miu, T. Sjostrand, Phys. Lett. B 449, 313 (1999) arXiv:hep-ph/9812455.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Nason, JHEP 11, 040 (2004) arXiv:hep-ph/0409146.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Catani, F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, B.R. Webber, JHEP 11, 063 (2001) arXiv:hep-ph/0109231.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Lönnblad, JHEP 05, 046 (2002) arXiv:hep-ph/0112284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W.T. Giele, D.A. Kosower, P.Z. Skands, Phys. Rev. D 78, 014026 (2008) arXiv:0707.3652.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann, F. Siegert, JHEP 05, 053 (2009) arXiv:0903.1219.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Hamilton, P. Richardson, J. Tully, JHEP 11, 038 (2009) arXiv:0905.3072.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Gieseke, JHEP 01, 058 (2005) arXiv:hep-ph/0412342.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, P. Skands, JHEP 05, 026 (2006) arXiv:hep-ph/0603175.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Buckley et al., Phys. Rep. 504, 145 (2011) arXiv:1101.2599.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Plätzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plätzer, S., Sjödahl, M. The Sudakov veto algorithm reloaded. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2012-12026-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2012-12026-x

Keywords

Navigation