Skip to main content
Log in

The twin paradox in a cosmological context

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently Abramowicz and Bajtlik (arXiv:0905.2428 (2009)) have studied the twin paradox in Schwarzschild spacetime. Considering circular motion they showed that the twin with a non-vanishing 4-acceleration is older than his brother at the reunion and argued that, in spaces that are asymptotically Minkowskian, there exists an absolute standard of rest determining which twin is the oldest at the reunion. Here we show that with vertical motion in Schwarzschild spacetime the result is the opposite: The twin with a non-vanishing 4-acceleration is younger. We also deduce the existence of a new relativistic time effect, that there is either a time dilation or an increased rate of time associated with a clock moving in a rotating frame. This is in fact a first-order effect in the velocity of the clock, and must be taken into account if the situation presented by Abramowicz and Bajtlik is described from the rotating rest frame of one of the twins. Our analysis shows that this effect has a Machian character since the rotating state of a frame depends upon the motion of the cosmic matter due to the inertial dragging it causes. We argue that a consistent formulation and resolution of the twin paradox makes use of the general principle of relativity and requires the introduction of an extended model of the Minkowski spacetime. In the extended model Minkowski spacetime is supplied with a cosmic shell of matter with radius equal to its own Schwarzschild radius, so that there is perfect inertial dragging inside the shell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Marder, Time and the Space-Traveller (George Allen & Unwin, London, 1971)

  2. E. Eriksen, O. Grøn, Eur. J. Phys. 11, 39 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T.A. Debs, M.G.L. Redhead, Am. J. Phys. 64, 384 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Nicolić, Found. Phys. Lett. 13, 595 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Iorio, Found. Phys. Lett. 18, 1 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ø. Grøn, S. Hervik, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity (Springer, New York, 2007)

  7. H.I.M. Lichtenegger, L. Iorio, “The twin paradox and Mach’s principle”, ArXiv:0910.1929 (2009)

  8. M.A. Abramowicz, S. Bajtlik, W. Kluzniak, Phys. Rev. A 75, 044101 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.A. Abramowicz, S. Bajtlik, “Adding to the paradox: the accelerated twin is older”, ArXiv:0905.2428 (2009)

  10. A. Einstein, Naturwissenschaften 6, 697 (1918)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Grøn, E. Eriksen, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 21, 105 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. B.H. Holstein, A.R. Swift, Am. J. Phys. 40, 746 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. O.G. Grøn, Am. J. Phys. 77, 373 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S.P. Boughn, Am. J. Phys. 57, 791 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D.F. Styer, Am. J. Phys. 75, 805 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Giannoni, O. Grøn, Am. J. Phys. 47, 431 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Minguzzi, Am. J. Phys. 73, 876 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. The fact that clocks moving freely in the vertical direction and along a circular path in the Schwarzschild spacetime age differently was noted several years ago by W. Rindler, Essential Relativity, 1st edition (Springer, 1969) Exercise 8.13

  19. J.C. Hafele, R.E. Keating, Science 177, 166 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.C. Hafele, R.E. Keating, Science 177, 168 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J.C. Hafele, Am. J. Phys. 40, 81 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Schlegel, Am. J. Phys. 420, 183 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Ashby, Living Rev. Relativity 6, 1 (2003)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ø. Grøn, Lecture Notes on the General Theory of Relativity (Springer, 2009)

  25. F.L. Markley, Am. J. Phys. 41, 1246 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Møller, The Theory of Relativity (Oxford, 1952) chapt. 8

  27. H. Thirring, Phys. Z. 19, 33 (1918)

    Google Scholar 

  28. D.R. Brill, J.M. Cohen, Phys. Rev. 143, 1011 (1966)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. J.M. Cohen, D.R. Brill, Nuovo Cimento 54, 209 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Pfister, H.K. Braun, Class. Quantum Grav. 2, 909 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S.M. Lewis, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 12, 917 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. C. Klein, Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 1619 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Barbour, H. Pfister (Editors), Mach’s Principle (Birkhauser, 1995)

  34. H. Pfister, “Dragging Effects Near Rotating Bodies and in Cosmological Models”, in ref. BarbourPfister, pp. 315--331

  35. C.A. Lopez, Phys. Rev. D 30, 313 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. O. Grøn, Phys. Rev. D 32, 1588 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Frauendiener, “On the Interpretation of Dragging Effects in Rotating Mass Shells”, in ref. BarbourPfister, pp. 353--363

  38. J. Overduin, “Spacetime and Spin”, Homepage of Gravity Probe B, http://einstein.stanford.edu/SPACETIME/spacetime4.html

  39. C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. D 74, 044031 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. D 79, 064007 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 49, 769 (1916)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. V. Faraoni, F.I. Cooperstock, Astrophys. J. 587, 483 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. H. Dingle, Science at the Crossroads (Martin Brian & O’Keeffe, London, 1972)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Braeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grøn, Ø., Braeck, S. The twin paradox in a cosmological context. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 126, 79 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11079-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11079-7

Keywords

Navigation