The European Physical Journal H

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 505–515 | Cite as

The remarkable history of the discovery of neutrino oscillations

Article

Abstract

The experimental observation of neutrino flavour oscillations took place some 30 years after they had been first proposed, and even then came about principally as a result of an anomalously low value in the measurement of the electroweak mixing angle, resulting in the possible validity of the minimal SU(5) grand unification scheme and the prediction of proton decay. In turn this led to underground experiments which failed in their original objective, but were to discover – purely as a background – the oscillatory behaviour of neutrino flavour, due to a fortuitous fourfold coincidence in the values of the neutrino mass differences, the Earth’s radius and magnetic field and the tiny value of the Fermi constant.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aglietta, M. et al. 1987. Europhys. Lett. 3: 1315.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmed, Q.R. et al. 2004. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92: 181301.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amaldi, U., W. de Boer and H. Furstenau. 1991. Phys. Lett. B 260: 447.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashie, Y. et al. 2004. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93: 101801.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Backenstoss, G.K. et al. 1960. Nuov. Cim. 16: 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bahcall, J. and R.K. Ulrich. 1988. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60: 297.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bahcall, J. and M.H. Pinsonneault. 1992. Rev. Mod. Phys. 64: 885.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker-Szendy, R. et al. 1992. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69: 1010.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger, C. et al. 1990. Phys. Lett. B 245: 305.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bionta, R. et al. 1987. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58: 1494.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Block, M.M. et al. 1964. Phys. Lett. 12: 281.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Budagov, I. et al. 1969. Phys. Lett. B 30: 364.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cherry, M.L. et al. 1981. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47: 1507.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Danby, G. et al. 1962. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9: 36.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis, R. 1959. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. (Washington Meeting).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis, R. 1964. Phys. Rev. Lett. 12: 303.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dimopoulos, S. 1994. Proc. IUPAP Conf. on H.E. Phys., Glasgow. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fukuda, S. et al. 2001. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86: 5681.ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fukuda, S. et al. 2003. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 501: 418.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fukuda, Y. et al. 1994. Phys. Lett. B 235: 337.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fukuda, Y. et al. 1998. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81: 1562.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Georgi, H. and S.L. Glashow. 1974. Phys. Rev. Lett. 32: 438.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gribov, V. and B. Pontecorvo. 1969. Phys. Lett. B 28: 493.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gross, D.J. and F. Wilczek. 1973. Phys. Rev. D 8: 3633.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirata, S.K. et al. 1987. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58: 1490.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirata, S.K. et al. 1988. Phys. Rev. D 38: 448.ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirata, S.K. et al. 1992. Phys. Lett. B 280: 146.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kafka, T. et al. 1994. Nucl. Phys. B 35: 427. (Proc. Suppl.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Langacker, P. 1981. Phys. Rep. 72: 186.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Learned, J., F. Reines and A. Soni. 1979. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43: 907.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maki, Z., M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata. 1962. Prog. Theor. Phys. 28: 870.ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Osborne, J.L., S.S. Said and A.W. Wolfendale. 1965. Proc. Phys. Soc. 86: 93.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Perkins, D.H. 1984. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 34: 1.ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Perkins, D.H. 1994. Astroparticle Physics 2: 249.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Politzer, H.D. 1974. Phys. Rep. C 14: 129.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pontecorvo, B. 1957. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 33: 549.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pontecorvo, B. 1958. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 34: 247.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pontecorvo, B. 1967. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 53: 1717.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Prescott, C.Y. et al. 1978. Phys. Lett. B 77: 347.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Prescott, C.Y. et al. 1979. Phys. Lett. B 84: 524.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Robertson, H. 1992. Proc. IUPAP meeting on High Energy Physics, Dallas. Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sakharov, A. 1967. JETP Lett. 5: 24.ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suzuki, A. 2005a. Physica Scripta T 121: 33-38.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Suzuki, Y. 2005b. Physica Scripta T 121: 23-28.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wess, J. and B. Zumino. 1974. Nucl. Phys. B 70: 39.ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yamaguchi, Y. 1959. Prog. Theor. Phys. 22: 373.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zatsepin, G.T. and V.A. Kuzmin. 1962. JETP 14: 1294.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations