Skip to main content
Log in

Quantum violation of trivial and non-trivial preparation contextuality: nonlocality and steering

  • Regular Article – Quantum Information
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper illustrates a direct connection between quantum steering and non-trivial preparation contextuality. In two party–two measurement per party–two outcomes per measurement \((2-2-2)\) Bell scenario, any argument of Bell nonlocality is a proof of trivial preparation contextuality; however, the converse may not hold. If one of the parties (say, Alice) performs the measurements of more than two dichotomic observables, then it is possible to find a set of non-trivial functional relations between Alice’s observables. We argue that the existence of a suitable set of such non-trivial relations between Alice’s observables may warrant the unsteerability of quantum states at the end of another spatially separated party (say, Bob). Interestingly, such constraints can be read as non-trivial preparation non-contextuality assumptions in an ontological model. We further demonstrate two types of Bell inequalities that can be converted into linear steering inequalities using the aforementioned non-trivial conditions on Alice’s observables. Such steering inequalities can also be considered as non-trivial preparation noncontextual inequalities. Since the local bound of the family of Bell expression gets reduced under the additional non-trivial conditions, it provides a test of quantum steering and nonlocality from the same family of Bell expressions depending upon its violation of the non-trivial preparation non-contextual or the local bound, thereby establishing a direct connection between quantum steering and non-trivial preparation contextuality.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.]

References

  1. J.S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kochen, E.P. Specker, J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Genovese, Phys. Rep. 413(6), 319–396 (2005)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Brunner et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Genovese, M. Gramegna, Appl. Sci. 9(24), 540 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Acin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Barrett, R. Colbeck, A. Kent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 010503 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. Zapatero et al., arXiv:2208.12842 (2022)

  11. S. Pironio et al., Nature 464, 1021–1024 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Acin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 100402 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Colbeck, R. Renner, Nature Phys. 8, 450–453 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Mannalath, S. Mishra, A. Pathak, arXiv:2203.00261 (2022)

  15. I. Supic, J. Bowles, Quantum 4, 337 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Brunner et al., T Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210503 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A.K. Pan, S.S. Mahato, Phys. Rev. A 102, 052221 (2020)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. R.W. Spekkens et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 010401 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Hameedi, A. Tavakoli, B. Marques, M. Bourennane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 220402 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Ghorai, A.K. Pan, Phys. Rev A 98, 032110 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Um et al., Sci. Rep. 3, 1627 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Um et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034077 (2020)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A.K. Pan, Eur. Phys. J. D 75, 98 (2021)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022322 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Howard, J. Wallman, V. Veitch, J. Emerson, Nature 510, 351 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. N.D. Mermin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803 (1993)

  27. M. Kernaghan, J. Phys. A 27, L829 (1994)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Cabello, J.M. Estebaranz, G. Garcia-Alcaine, Phys. Lett. A 212, 183 (1996)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 210401 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. A.A. Klyachko, M.A. Can, S. Binicioglu, A.S. Shumovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 020403 (2008)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. A.K. Pan, EPL 90, 40002 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Yu, C.H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 030402 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. A.K. Pan, Sci. Rep. 9, 17631 (2019)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. C. Budroni et al., arXiv:2102.13036 (2021)

  35. R.W. Spekkens, Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. N. Harrigan, R. Spekkens, Found. Phys. 40, 125 (2010)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Spekkens, Found. Phys. 44, 1125 (2014)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Kumari, A.K. Pan, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062130 (2019)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. E. Schrodinger, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 555 (1935)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. M.D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. H.M. Wiseman, S.J. Jones, A.C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. S.J. Jones, H.M. Wiseman, A.C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. A. 76, 052116 (2007)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. E.G. Cavalcanti, S.J. Jones, H.M. Wiseman, M.D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032112 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. M.T. Quintino, T. Vertesi, N. Brunner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160402 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. R. Uola, T. Moroder, O. Guhne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160403 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. J.-L. Chen, H.-Y. Su, Z.-P. Xu, A.K. Pati, Sci. Rep. 6, 32075 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Das, S. Sasmal, S. Roy, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052109 (2019)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. D. Das, S. Sasmal, A. Roy, Quantum Inf. Process. 18, 315 (2019)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Uola, A.C.S. Costa, H.C. Nguyen, O. Gühne, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015001 (2020)

  51. J. Barrett (unpublished, private communication)

  52. M. Pusey, Phys. Rev. A 98, 022112 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. A. Tavakoli, R. Uola, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013011 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  54. N. Gisin, arXiv:quant-ph/0702021

  55. D.J. Saunders, S.J. Jones, H.M. Wiseman, G.J. Pryde, Nature Phys. 6, 845–849 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

PR acknowledges the support from the research grant DST/ICPS/QuEST/2019/4. AKP acknowledges the support from the research grant MTR/2021/000908.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AKP conceived the idea and supervised the work. Both authors contributed to the calculations, and preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Pan.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, P., Pan, A.K. Quantum violation of trivial and non-trivial preparation contextuality: nonlocality and steering. Eur. Phys. J. D 76, 204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00538-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00538-9

Navigation