Abstract
It is of great significance to measure tiny difference frequency precisely, which has important application value for Doppler velocity measurement. However, the systematic error caused by non-ideal detectors during measurements limits the improvement of precision, and the systematic error cannot be reduced by increasing the number of measurements. Aiming at the systematic error, the weak value amplification scheme can reduce it effectively. This paper proposes a precise measurement scheme for tiny difference frequency between Fock state photons based on weak value amplification technology. Meanwhile, we use the theory of error to discuss the measurement precision of this scheme, and finish simulation research on the theoretical basis. Simulation results show that weak value amplification can reduce the systematic error of the measurement system and improve the response sensitivity of non-ideal detectors. By adjusting the transmission and reflection coefficients of the beam splitter in our scheme, the response sensitivity of difference frequency can improve 1000 times compared with that of classical schemes. When the systematic error of the measurement system is the main source of error in the measurement process, the weak value amplification scheme can obtain higher precision.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This is a theoretical study and no experimental data.]
References
Y. Aharonov, D.Z. Albert, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)
J. Dressel, M. Malik, F.M. Miatto, A.N. Jordan, R.W. Boyd, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 307 (2013)
J.P. Tomes, L.J. Salazar, Sci. Rep. 6, 19702 (2016)
N. Brunner, C. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 010405 (2010)
Y. Aharonov, A. Botero, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052111 (2005)
J. Calsamiglia, B. Gendra, R. Munoz-Tapia, E. Bagan, New J. Phys. 18, 103049 (2016)
J.M. Rincón, C.A. Mullarkey, G.I. Viza, M.R. Julián, W.T. Liu, J.C. Howell, Opt. Lett 42, 2479 (2017)
M. Pfeifer, P. Fischer, Opt. Express 19, 16508 (2011)
X. Zhou, Z. Xiao, H. Luo, S. Wen, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043809 (2011)
P.B. Dixon, D.J. Starling, A.N. Jordan, J.C. Howell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 173601 (2009)
J.M. Hogan, J. Hammer, S.-W. Chiow, S. Dickerson, D.M.S. Johnson, T. Kovachy, A. Sugarbaker, M.A. Kasevich, Opt. Lett. 36, 1698 (2011)
M.D. Turner, C.A. Hagedorn, S. Schlanvninger, J.H. Gundlach, Opt. Lett. 36, 1479 (2011)
G. Strubi, C. Bruder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 083605 (2013)
X.Y. Xu, Y. Kedem, K. Sun, L. Vaidman, C.F. Li, G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 033604 (2013)
G. Jayaswal, G. Mistura, M. Merano, Opt. Lett. 39, 6257 (2014)
P. Egan, J.A. Stone, Opt. Lett. 37, 4991 (2012)
O. Hosten, P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008)
Y. Gorodetski, K.Y. Bliokh, B. Stein, C. Genet, T.W. Ebbesen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 013901013901 (2012)
A. Feizpour, X. Xing, A.M. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133603 (2011)
G.I. Viza, J. Martínez-Rincón, G.A. Howland, H. Frostig, I. Shomroni, B. Dayan, J.C. Howell, Opt. Lett. 38, 2949–2952 (2013)
D.J. Starling, P.B. Dixon, A.N. Jordan, J.C. Howell, Phys. Rev. A 82, 063822 (2010)
C.M. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62075049) and (61701139).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contribute equally to the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Zhang, Z. & Zhao, Y. High-precision measurement of tiny difference frequency via weak value amplification. Eur. Phys. J. D 75, 238 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00245-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-021-00245-x