Skip to main content
Log in

Optical switching in a Ξ system: A comparative study on DROP and EIT

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this experimental work we address the issue of optical switching through pump induced atomic coherence in pump-probe spectroscopy of Doppler broadened medium of Rubidium atoms. Here a cascade system 5S → 5P → 5D is chosen as the medium for optical switching. The merit of using this level scheme for current study lies in the fact that two photon spectroscopy conducted in the above-mentioned manifold results into a combination of double resonance optical pumping (DROP) and electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) signals. Within an intensity modulation frequency range of 10   Hz → 10 MHz, DROP and EIT behave differently. This fact may be attributed to the distinctive difference in mechanisms giving rise to DROP and EIT signals. Though both DROP and EIT stem from two photon spectroscopy, unlike DROP, which arises due to population transfer between dipole forbidden 5S → 5D levels, EIT originates from destructive quantum interference mechanism. This subtle difference is well evidenced when optical switching is conducted through the coherently prepared alkali vapour sample. The EIT is found to be more agile towards faster optical switching while DROP acts as an over damped medium for the same. A simple qualitative discussion is included to explain our results on optical switching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Arimondo, Progress in Optics (Elsevier Science, 1996), Vol. XXXV, p. 258

  2. K.J. Boller, A. Imamoglu, S.E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2593 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A.M. Akulshin, S. Barriero, A. Lezamo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2996 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. O. Kocharovskaya, Y. Rostovtsev, M.O. Scully, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 628 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Knappe, V. Shah, P.D. Schwindt, L. Hollberg, J. Kitching, L. Liew, J. Moreland, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1460 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Stähler, S. Knappe, C. Affolderbach, W. Kemp, R. Wynands, Eur. Phys. Lett. 54, 323 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H.S. Moon, L. Lee, K. Kim, J.B. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 3001 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S.C. Bell, D.M. Heywood, J.D. White, J.D. Close, R.E. Scholten, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 171120 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y.B. Kale, A. Ray, N. Singh, Q.V. Lawande, B.N. Jagatap, Eur. Phys. J. D 61, 221 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. H.S. Moon, Opt. Commun. 284, 1327 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Schimdt, R.J. Ram, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3173 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Clarke, H. Chen, W.A. Van Wijngaarden, Appl. Opt. 40, 2047 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Yu, J. Li, P. Huang, A. Zheng, X. Yang, Opt. Commun. 284, 2930 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meng-J. Lee, Yi-H. Chen, I.-C. Wang, I.A. Yu, Opt. Express 20, 11057 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Krishnamurthy, Y. Wang, Y. Tu, S. Tseng, M.S. Shahriar, Opt. Express 20, 13798 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. H.S. Moon, L. Lee, J.B. Kim, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 2529 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. H.S. Moon, L. Lee, J.B. Kim, Opt. Express 16, 12163 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. H.S. Moon, H.R. Noh, J. Phys. B 44, 055004 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Yang, J. Gao, T. Zhang, J. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 83, 013818 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Bao-Dong, G. Jing, L. Qiang-Bing, W. Jie, Z. Tian-Cai, W. Jun-Min, Chin. Phys. B 20, 044202 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Gea-Banacloche, Y. Li, S. Jin, M. Xiao, Phys. Rev. A 51, 576 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M.S. Safronova, C.J. Williams, C.W. Clark, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022509 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. H.-R. Noh, H.S. Moon, Phys. Rev. A 85, 033817 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J.P. Marangos, J. Mod. Opt. 45, 471 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Shepherd, D.J. Fulton, M.H. Dunn, Phys. Rev. A 54, 5394 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Ohshima, H. Schnatz, J. Appl. Phys. 71, 3114 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. H.-R. Noh, H.S. Moon, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022509 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Y.-Q. Li, M. Xiao, Opt. Lett. 20, 1489 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Wielandy, A.L. Gaeta, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2500 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Sabir Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ray, A., Sabir Ali, M. & Chakrabarti, A. Optical switching in a Ξ system: A comparative study on DROP and EIT. Eur. Phys. J. D 67, 78 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2013-30653-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2013-30653-1

Keywords

Navigation