Abstract
We discuss the geometric phases and flux densities for the metastable states of hydrogen with principal quantum number n = 2 being subjected to adiabatically varying external electric and magnetic fields. Convenient representations of the flux densities as complex integrals are derived. Both, parity conserving (PC) and parity violating (PV) flux densities and phases are identified. General expressions for the flux densities following from rotational invariance are derived. Specific cases of external fields are discussed. In a pure magnetic field the phases are given by the geometry of the path in magnetic field space. But for electric fields in presence of a constant magnetic field and for electric plus magnetic fields the geometric phases carry information on the atomic parameters, in particular, on the PV atomic interaction. We show that for our metastable states also the decay rates can be influenced by the geometric phases and we give a concrete example for this effect. Finally we emphasise that the general relations derived here for geometric phases and flux densities are also valid for other atomic systems having stable or metastable states, for instance, for He with n = 2. Thus, a measurement of geometric phases may give important experimental information on the mass matrix and the electric and magnetic dipole matrices for such systems. This could be used as a check of corresponding theoretical calculations of wave functions and matrix elements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984)
B. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2167 (1983)
Geometric Phases in Physics, in Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, edited by A. Shapere, F. Wilczek (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), Vol. 5
Geometry, Topology and Physics, in Graduate student series in physics, edited by M. Nakahara (Adam Hilger, Bristol and New York, 1990)
J. Garrison, E. Wright, Phys. Lett. A 128, 177 (1988)
S. Massar, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4770 (1996)
F. Keck, H.J. Korsch, S. Mossmann, J. Phys. A 36, 2125 (2003)
M.V. Berry, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004)
W. Heiss, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1091 (2004)
A.I. Nesterov, F.A. de la Cruz, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 485304 (2008)
T. Bergmann, T. Gasenzer, O. Nachtmann, Eur. Phys. J. D 45, 197 (2007)
T. Bergmann, T. Gasenzer, O. Nachtmann, Eur. Phys. J. D 45, 211 (2007)
M. DeKieviet, D. Dubbers, C. Schmidt, D. Scholz, U. Spinola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1919 (1995)
T. Bergmann, M. DeKieviet, T. Gasenzer, O. Nachtmann, M.I. Trappe, Eur. Phys. J. D 54, 551 (2009)
M. DeKieviet, T. Gasenzer, O. Nachtmann, M.I. Trappe, Hyperfine Int. 200, 35 (2011)
I.B. Khriplovich, Parity Nonconservation in Atomic Phenomena (Gordon and Breach, Philadelphia, 1991)
M. Bouchiat, C. Bouchiat, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 1351 (1997)
M.A. Bouchiat, submitted to Il Nuovo Cimento C arXiv:1111.2172v1 [physics.atom-ph] (2011)
M.A. Bouchiat, J. Guena, L. Hunter, L. Pottier, Phys. Lett. B 117, 358 (1982)
C.S. Wood, S.C. Bennett, D. Cho, B.P. Masterson, J.L. Roberts, C.E. Tanner, C.E. Wieman, Science 275, 1759 (1997)
S.C. Bennett, C.E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2484 (1999)
M.J.D. Macpherson, K.P. Zetie, R.B. Warrington, D.N. Stacey, J.P. Hoare, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2784 (1991)
N.H. Edwards, S.J. Phipp, P.E.G. Baird, S. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2654 (1995)
P.A. Vetter, D.M. Meekhof, P.K. Majumder, S.K. Lamoreaux, E.N. Fortson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2658 (1995)
D.M. Meekhof, P. Vetter, P.K. Majumder, S.K. Lamoreaux, E.N. Fortson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3442 (1993)
K. Tsigutkin, D. Dounas-Frazer, A. Family, J.E. Stalnaker, V.V. Yashchuk, D. Budker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 071601 (2009)
K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010)
L.W. Wansbeek, B.K. Sahoo, R.G.E. Timmermans, K. Jungmann, B.P. Das, D. Mukherjee, Phys. Rev. A 78, 050501 (2008)
O.O. Versolato et al., Phys. Lett. A 375, 3130 (2011)
A. Schäfer, G. Soff, P. Indelicato, B. Müller, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7362 (1989)
L.N. Labzowsky, A.V. Nefiodov, G. Plunien, G. Soff, R. Marrus, D. Liesen, Phys. Rev. A 63, 054105 (2001)
V.M. Shabaev, A.V. Volotka, C. Kozhuharov, G. Plunien, T. Stöhlker, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052102 (2010)
F. Ferro, A. Artemyev, T. Stöhlker, A. Surzhykov, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062503 (2010)
F. Ferro, A. Surzhykov, T. Stöhlker, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052518 (2011)
R.W. Dunford, R.J. Holt, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34, 2099 (2007)
R.W. Dunford, R.J. Holt, Hyperfine Int. 200, 45 (2011)
J. Sapirstein, K. Pachucki, K.T. Cheng, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022113 (2004)
L.N. Labzowsky, A.V. Shonin, D.A. Solovyev, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, 265 (2005)
V.F. Weisskopf, E.P. Wigner, Z. Phys. 63, 54 (1930)
V.F. Weisskopf, E.P. Wigner, Z. Phys. 65, 18 (1930)
L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical coherence and quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)
S.M. Barnett, P.M. Radmore, Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics (Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 1997)
P.L. Knight, L. Allen, Phys. Lett. A 38, 99 (1972)
Y.K. Wang, I.C. Khoo, Opt. Commun. 11, 323 (1974)
W. Bernreuther, O. Nachtmann, Z. Phys. A 309, 197 (1983)
O. Nachtmann, Elementary particle physics, concepts and phenomena (Springer, Berlin, 1990)
G.W. Botz, D. Bruss, O. Nachtmann, Ann. Phys. 240, 107 (1995)
R. Jacob, R.G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. 121, 350 (1961)
R.G Sachs, Ann. Phys. 22, 239 (1963)
H. Flanders, Differential Forms, in Mathematics in Science and Engineering (Academic Press, New York, 1963), Vol. 11
D. Bruss, T. Gasenzer, O. Nachtmann, Eur. Phys. J. direct D2, 1 (1999)
C.E. Loving, P.G.H. Sandars, J. Phys. B 10, 2755 (1977)
M. DeKieviet, private communication
S.F. Pate, D.W. McKee, V. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. C 78, 015207 (2008)
D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 072001 (2008)
D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034030 (2009)
M. Alekseev et al. (COMPASS), Phys. Lett. B 693, 227 (2010)
E. Leader, A.V. Sidorov, D.B. Stamenov, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014002 (2011)
J. Erler, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 72, 073003 (2005)
U. Jentschura, S. Kotochigova, E. LeBigot, P. Mohr, B. Taylor, The Energy Levels of Hydrogen and Deuterium (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005)
S.G. Karshenboim, Phys. Rep. 422, 1 (2005)
E.U. Condon, G.H. Shortley, The Theory of Atomic Spectra (Cambridge University Press, 1963)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gasenzer, T., Nachtmann, O. & Trappe, M.I. Metastable states of hydrogen: their geometric phases and flux densities. Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 113 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2012-20465-2
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2012-20465-2