Skip to main content
Log in

Bell’s theory with no locality assumption

  • Quantum Optics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove versions of the Bell and the GHZ theorems that do not assume locality but only the effect after cause principle (EACP) according to which for any Lorentz observer the value of an observable cannot change because of an event that happens after the observable is measured. We show that the EACP is strictly weaker than locality. As a consequence of our results, locality cannot be considered as the common cause of the contradictions obtained in all versions of Bell’s theory. All versions of Bell’s theorem assume weak realism according to which the value of an observable is well defined whenever the measurement could be made and some measurement is made. As a consequence of our results, weak realism becomes the only hypothesis common to the contradictions obtained in all versions of Bell’s theory. Usually, one avoids these contradictions by assuming non-locality; this would not help in our case since we do not assume locality. This work indicates that it is weak realism, not locality, that needs to be negated to avoid contradictions in microscopic physics, at least if one refuses as false the de Broglie-Bohm hidden variable theory because of its essential violation of Lorentz invariance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice Hall, New York, 1951)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H.P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. D 3, 1303 (1971)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.S. Bell, Physic (Long Island City, NY) 1, 195 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Le Bellac, Quantum Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. H.P. Stapp, in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: 50 years of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Gedankenexperiment, edited by P. Lahti, P. Mittelstaedt (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985), pp. 637–652

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.S. Bell, in Foundations of quantum mechanics, Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, course IL, edited by B. d’Espagnat (Academic Press, New York), pp. 171–181

  10. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Zeilinger, Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem, In Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory, And Conceptions Of The Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academics, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989), pp. 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. N.D. Mermin, Am. J. Phys. 58, 731 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, A. Zeilinger, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Einstein, R.C. Tolman, B. Podolsky, Phys. Rev. 37, 780 (1931)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Tresser, modified from e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0503006

  17. W. Heisenberg, Zeitschrift für Physik 43, 172 (1927); English translation: J.A. Wheeler, H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement (Univ. Press, Princeton, 1983), pp. 62–84

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Sica, e-print arXiv:quant/ph0101087

  19. L. Sica, e-print arXiv:quant/ph0101094

  20. A. Fine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Fine, J. Math. Phys. 23, 1306 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Boole, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 152, 225 (1862)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Pitowsky, in Bell Theorem, Quantum Theory and the Conception of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Pitowsky, Math. Prog. A 50, 395 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. I. Pitowsky, Brit. J. Phil. Soc. 45, 95 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. I. Pitowsky, Phys. Rev. A 64, 4102 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Jordan, Phys. Lett. A 94, 264 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. L. de Broglie, Tentative d’interpretation causale et nonlinéaire de la mécanique ondulatoire (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 180 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Bouwmeester, J. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. L.E. Szabó, A. Fine, Phys. Lett. A 295, 229 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Hess, W. Philipp, e-print arXiv: quant-ph/040015

  33. L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Tresser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tresser, C. Bell’s theory with no locality assumption. Eur. Phys. J. D 58, 385–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-00122-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-00122-8

Keywords

Navigation