Abstract
We prove versions of the Bell and the GHZ theorems that do not assume locality but only the effect after cause principle (EACP) according to which for any Lorentz observer the value of an observable cannot change because of an event that happens after the observable is measured. We show that the EACP is strictly weaker than locality. As a consequence of our results, locality cannot be considered as the common cause of the contradictions obtained in all versions of Bell’s theory. All versions of Bell’s theorem assume weak realism according to which the value of an observable is well defined whenever the measurement could be made and some measurement is made. As a consequence of our results, weak realism becomes the only hypothesis common to the contradictions obtained in all versions of Bell’s theory. Usually, one avoids these contradictions by assuming non-locality; this would not help in our case since we do not assume locality. This work indicates that it is weak realism, not locality, that needs to be negated to avoid contradictions in microscopic physics, at least if one refuses as false the de Broglie-Bohm hidden variable theory because of its essential violation of Lorentz invariance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice Hall, New York, 1951)
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)
H.P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. D 3, 1303 (1971)
J.S. Bell, Physic (Long Island City, NY) 1, 195 (1964)
A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993)
M. Le Bellac, Quantum Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)
H.P. Stapp, in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: 50 years of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Gedankenexperiment, edited by P. Lahti, P. Mittelstaedt (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985), pp. 637–652
J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)
J.S. Bell, in Foundations of quantum mechanics, Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, course IL, edited by B. d’Espagnat (Academic Press, New York), pp. 171–181
J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974)
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)
D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Zeilinger, Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem, In Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory, And Conceptions Of The Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academics, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989), pp. 73–76
N.D. Mermin, Am. J. Phys. 58, 731 (1990)
D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, A. Zeilinger, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990)
A. Einstein, R.C. Tolman, B. Podolsky, Phys. Rev. 37, 780 (1931)
C. Tresser, modified from e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0503006
W. Heisenberg, Zeitschrift für Physik 43, 172 (1927); English translation: J.A. Wheeler, H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement (Univ. Press, Princeton, 1983), pp. 62–84
L. Sica, e-print arXiv:quant/ph0101087
L. Sica, e-print arXiv:quant/ph0101094
A. Fine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291 (1982)
A. Fine, J. Math. Phys. 23, 1306 (1982)
G. Boole, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 152, 225 (1862)
I. Pitowsky, in Bell Theorem, Quantum Theory and the Conception of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989)
I. Pitowsky, Math. Prog. A 50, 395 (1991)
I. Pitowsky, Brit. J. Phil. Soc. 45, 95 (1994)
I. Pitowsky, Phys. Rev. A 64, 4102 (2001)
T. Jordan, Phys. Lett. A 94, 264 (1983)
L. de Broglie, Tentative d’interpretation causale et nonlinéaire de la mécanique ondulatoire (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1956)
D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 180 (1952)
D. Bouwmeester, J. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345 (1999)
L.E. Szabó, A. Fine, Phys. Lett. A 295, 229 (2002)
K. Hess, W. Philipp, e-print arXiv: quant-ph/040015
L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665 (1993)
L. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tresser, C. Bell’s theory with no locality assumption. Eur. Phys. J. D 58, 385–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-00122-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-00122-8