Abstract.
A new technique for using the CFD commercial code FLUENT\(^{\copyright}\) to simulate inductively coupled plasma torches by means of two-dimensional axisymmetric models is presented. The method is based on an external user-defined function (UDF) which fully solves the electromagnetic field equations, letting the FLUENT\(^{\copyright}\) built-in module calculate only the plasma temperature and velocity fields inside the torch region. In this framework, computations have been carried out for LTE, optica lly thin argon plasmas at atmospheric pressure, using extended grid models with either magnetic dipole or vanishing vector potential boundary conditions for the electromagnetic field. It is shown that our newly developed technique is up to 60% faster on each iteration than that using user-defined scalars (UDS) previously proposed in the literature, as the need of solving flow field equations also outside the plasma zone is eliminated. Calculations are also performed using exact integral boundary conditions for the vector potential, as given by the standard electromagnetic field approach, taking into account the effects of both exciting and induced currents. The corresponding results are compared with the approximate ones obtained by employing extended grid models, showing that for small radial dimensions of the electromagnetic field domain, the magnetic dipole boundary conditions give more realistic solutions than those assuming a vanish ing vector potential.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Bernardi, V. Colombo, E. Ghedini, A. Mentrelli, in Atti del XVI Congresso dell’Associazione Italiana del Vuoto, Catania (Italy), 7-9 October 2002, edited by Editrice Compositori (Bologna, 2003), pp. 267-272
D. Bernardi, V. Colombo, E. Ghedini, A. Mentrelli, Eur. Phys. J. D 22, 119 (2003)
R. Ye, P. Proulx, M.I. Boulos, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 42, 1585 (1999)
S. Xue, P. Proulx, M.I. Boulos, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 23, 245 (2003)
X. Chen, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 22, 361 (1989)
J. Mostaghimi, M.I. Boulos, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 9, 25 (1989)
X. Chen, E. Pfender, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 11, 103 (1991)
V. Colombo, C. Panciatichi, A. Zazo, G. Cocito, L. Cognolato, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 25, 1073 (1997)
D. Bernardi, V. Colombo, G.G.M. Coppa, A. D’Angola, Eur. Phys. J. D 14, 337 (2001)
S. Xue, P. Proulx, M.I. Boulos, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34, 1897 (2001)
J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1975), pp. 219-223
R.C. Miller, R.J. Ayen, J. Appl. Chem. 40, 5260 (1969)
S. Xue, P. Proulx, M.I. Boulos, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35, 1123 (2002)
S. Xue, P. Proulx, M.I. Boulos, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35, 1131 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Received: 21 February 2003, Published online: 29 July 2003
PACS:
52.75.Hn Plasma torches - 52.65.-y Plasma simulation - 52.80.Pi High-frequency and RF discharges
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernardi, D., Colombo, V., Ghedini, E. et al. Comparison of different techniques for the FLUENT\(^{\copyright}\)-based treatment of the electromagnetic field in inductively coupled plasma torches. Eur. Phys. J. D 27, 55–72 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2003-00227-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2003-00227-1