Skip to main content
Log in

Power corrections to the process \(\gamma^{*}\gamma \to \pi\pi\) in the running coupling method

  • theoretical physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Power-suppressed corrections coming from the end-point integration regions in the amplitude of the process \(\gamma^{*}\gamma \to \pi\pi\) at large Q 2 and small squared center-of-mass energy W 2 are calculated in the QCD hard-scattering approach where the amplitudes factorize in a hard perturbatively calculable part and a generalized distribution amplitude. The running coupling method and the technique of infrared renormalon calculus are applied to obtain Borel resummed expressions for the two main components of the process amplitude. Numerical estimates for these power corrections are presented. They are sizeable when Q 2 < 10 GeV2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.P. Lepage, S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980); A.V. Efremov, A.V. Radyushkin, Theor. Math. Phys. 42, 97 (1980) [Teor. Mat. Phiz. 42, 147 (1980)]; Phys. Lett. B 94, 245 (1980); A. Duncan, A.H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. D 21, 1636 (1980); V.L. Chernyak, A.R. Zhitnitsky, Phys. Rep. 112, 173 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Diehl, T. Gousset, B. Pire, O. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1782 (1998); M. Diehl, T. Gousset, B. Pire, Phys. Rev. D 62, 073014 (2000); A. Freund, Phys. Rev. D 61, 074010 (2000); I.V. Anikin, B. Pire, O.V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. D 69, 014018 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O.V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 510, 125 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. X. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 55, 7114 (1997); A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 380, 417 (1996); Phys. Rev. D 56, 5524 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Diehl, Phys. Rept. 388, 41 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Pire, L. Szymanowski, Phys. Lett. B 556, 129 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Achard et al. [L3 Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 568, 11 (2003); D. Urner, AIP Conf. Proc. 698, 566 (2004) [hep-ex/0309045]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Vanderhaeghen, P.A.M. Guichon, M. Guidal, Phys. Rev. D 60, 094017 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Kivel, L. Mankiewicz, Eur. Phys. J. C 18, 107 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Kivel, L. Mankiewicz, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054017 (2001); I.V. Anikin, O.V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 509, 95 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S.J. Brodsky, G.P. Lepage, P.B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D 28, 228 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Braaten, Y.-Q. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4236 (1998) [Erratum D 59, 079901 (1999)]; R. Akhoury, A. Sinkovics, M.G. Sotiropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 58, 013011 (1998); A.V. Belitsky, A. Schäfer, Nucl. Phys. B 527, 235 (1998); J. Andersen, Phys. Lett. B 475, 141 (2000); E. Gardi, G. Grunberg, JHEP 9911, 016 (1999); A. Belitsky, AIP Conf. Proc. 698, 607 (2004) [hep-ph/0307256]; V.M. Braun, E. Gardi, S. Gottwald, Nucl. Phys. B 685, 171 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Beneke, Phys. Rep. 317, 1 (1999); A. Grozin, hep-ph/0311050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S.S. Agaev, Phys. Lett. B 360, 117 (1995) [Erratum B 369, 379 (1996)]; Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, 2009 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S.S. Agaev, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11, 957 (1996); A 13, 2637 (1998); Eur. Phys. J. C 1, 321 (1998); Few Body Syst. Suppl. 11, 263 (1999); Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 74, 155 (1999); S.S. Agaev, A.I. Mukhtarov, Y.V. Mamedova, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 1419 (2000); S.S. Agaev, A.I. Mukhtarov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 3179 (2001); A.I. Karanikas, N.G. Stefanis, Phys. Lett. B 504, 225 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.S. Agaev, Phys. Rev. D 64, 014007 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S.S. Agaev, Phys. Rev. D 69, 094010 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.S. Agaev, N.G. Stefanis, Eur. Phys. J. C 32, 507 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Kivel, L. Mankiewicz, M.V. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 467, 263 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M.V. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B 555, 231 (1999); Ph. Hägler, P. Pire, L. Szymanowski, O.V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 535, 117 (2002) [Erratum B 540, 324 (2002)]; Eur. Phys. J. C 26, 261 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Contopanagos, G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 419, 77 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. ‘t Hooft, in Whys of Subnuclear Physics, Proceeding of the International School, Erice, 1977, edited by A. Zichichi (Plenum, New York 1978); A.I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B 385, 452 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Guidal.

Additional information

Received: 29 March 2004, Revised: 11 May 2004, Published online: 1 October 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agaev, S.S., Guidal, M. & Pire, B. Power corrections to the process \(\gamma^{*}\gamma \to \pi\pi\) in the running coupling method. Eur. Phys. J. C 37, 457–464 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2004-02010-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2004-02010-5

Keywords

Navigation