Skip to main content
Log in

Testing non-commutative QED \(\gamma\gamma\gamma\) and \(\gamma\gamma\gamma\gamma\) couplings at LHC

  • theoretical physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In this work, we investigate the sensitivity of the process \(p + p \to q + q \to j + j + \gamma + \gamma \) at LHC for the photonic 3- and 4-point functions that appear in non-commutative QED. We show that this process serves to study the behavior of the space-space as well as of the space-time non-commutativity. We also show that this process can probe the non-commutative scale \(\Lambda\) in the range of a few TeV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.S. Snyder, Phys. Rev. D 71, 38 (1947)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Connes, M.R. Douglas, A. Schwarz, J. High Energy Phys. 9802, 003 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Seiberg, E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 9909, 032 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998); L. Randal, R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Hewett, F.J. Petriello, T.G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 64, 075012 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Rizzo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 2797 (2003); S. Godfrey, M.A. Doncheski, Phys. Rev. D 65, 015005 (2002); A. Anisimov, T. Banks, M. Dine, M. Graesser, Phys. Rev. D 65, 085032 (2002); H. Grosse, Y. Liao, Phys. Rev. D 64, 115007 (2001); S-W Baek, D.K. Ghosh, X-G He, W.Y.P. Hwang, Phys. Rev. D 64, 056001 (2001); S. Godfrey, M.A. Doncheski, hep-ph/0111147; N. Mahajan, hep-ph/0110148

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Mathews, Phys. Rev. D 63, 075007 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. For an excellent review of the phenomenology of NCQED, see I. Hinchliffe, N. Kersting, hep-ph/0205040

  9. A. Armoni, Nucl. Phys. B 593, 229 (2001); M. Chaichian, P. Presnajder, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, A. Tureanu, Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 413 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Calmet, B. Jurco, P. Schupp, J. Wess, M. Wohlgenannt, Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 363 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Behr, N.G. Deshpande, G. Duplancic, P. Schupp, J. Trampetic, J. Wess, Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 441 (2003); E.O. Iltan, Phys. Rev. D 66, 034011 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Stelzer, W.F. Long, Comput. Phys. Commun. 81, 357 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Murayama, I. Watanabe, K. Hagiwara, KEK report 91-11 (unpublished)

  14. O.J.P. Éboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, S.M. Lietti, hep-ph/0310141

  15. O.J. Éboli, D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Lett. B 495, 147 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Lietti.

Additional information

Received: 9 February 2004, Revised: 27 February 2004, Published online: 8 April 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lietti, S.M., de S. Pires, C.A. Testing non-commutative QED \(\gamma\gamma\gamma\) and \(\gamma\gamma\gamma\gamma\) couplings at LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 137–143 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2004-01777-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2004-01777-5

Navigation