## Abstract

It is shown that the paper “Greybody radiation and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumblebee gravity model” (Kanzi and Sakallı in Eur Phys J C 81:501, 2021) recently published in this journal is based on an incorrect result obtained by Ding et al. (Eur Phys J C 80:178, 2020) for a Kerr-like black hole solution.

## 1 Comment

The paper “Greybody radiation and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumblebee gravity model” [1] is an interesting work that seeks to establish a significant relationship between two important realms of the current research on astrophysics and high energy physics, namely, semi-classical gravitation associated to rotating black holes and Lorentz symmetry breakdown. This latter embodies features that are beyond the standard model of elementary particles and fundamental interactions. However, the aforementioned work exhibits inconsistencies that need to be clarified and corrected, and the present comment seeks to do this.

Firstly, the complete rotational Kerr-like black hole solution used in [1] does not satisfy the equation of motion for the bumblebee field, as it already was discussed in Ref. [2], although that has not been shown explicitly. Such a solution exists only in the slow rotation approximation, i.e., when we consider only linear terms in the rotational parameter, *a*. On the other hand, it is possible to show that neither the modified Einstein equations are satisfied. In fact, after performing a series of manipulations of the gravitational field equations, the authors in [3] claim to have found an exact Kerr-like solution for the Einstein-bumblebee theory, which in Boyer–Lindquist coordinates can be written as

where \(\ell =\varrho b^{2}\) encodes contribution from the Lorentz-violating effects, and the functions \(\Sigma \), \(\Delta \) and *A* are defined as

On the other hand, the equation of motion for the bumblebee field is

where the bumblebee field strength is \(b_{\mu \nu }=\partial _{\mu }b_{\nu }-\partial _{\nu }b_{\mu }\), with \(\varrho \) being a coupling constant, and \(\kappa =8\pi G_{N}\). Notice that the original bumblebee field \(B_\mu \) was frozen at its vacuum expectation value (vev) i.e., \(B_\mu = b_\mu \) and that its vev has a constant norm \(b_\mu b^\mu = \mp b^2\). These vacuum conditions ensure that the bumblebee field preserves the minimum of the potential, i.e., \(V'=0=V\).

The assumed condition for the bumblebee field is

such that \(b_{\mu }b^{\mu }=b^{2}\) is a positive constant. Thus, the nonzero components for the bumblebee field strength are \(b_{r\theta }=-b_{\theta r}=-b\partial _{\theta }\Sigma /2\sqrt{\Delta \Sigma }\), and the relevant components obtained from Eq. (1.3) are \(\nabla ^{\theta }b_{\theta r}+\frac{\varrho }{\kappa }b^{r}R_{rr}\) and \(\nabla ^{r}b_{r\theta }+\frac{\varrho }{\kappa }b^{r}R_{r\theta }\).

For the metric (1.1), the bumblebee equations of motion can be explicitly written as

and

where we replace \(\varrho =\ell /b^{2}\). In this way, the solution presented in [3] fails to solve exactly the equation of motion for the bumblebee field. However, in the slowly rotating limit, i.e., \(a^{2}\rightarrow 0\), these equations are fulfilled. They become

and

where \({\mathcal {O}}( a ^{3})\) denotes terms of order greater than or equal to \(a^{3}\). It is worth mentioning that for a small *b* limit, the Eqs. (1.5) and (1.6) should at least be proportional to *b*. Indeed, these quantities take the form

and

and essentially, the equation of motion (1.3) is not satisfied at the small *b* limit either. Such results are in agreement with those presented in [2], and similarly, it can be shown explicitly (using the computer algebra program [4] ) that the Einstein-bumblebee gravitational equations are also not satisfied by the solution (1.1). Thus, the existence of a full rotating black hole solution for the Einstein-bumblebee theory remains an open issue.

From the foregoing, the authors of reference [1] spoiled their work from the beginning, and we fear it is irremediable. However, the physical implications of the studied model might be considered if the original results are fitted to the slow rotating solution approximation.

## Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The present paper contains purely theoretical analysis, and it did not generate any experimental or computational data.]

## References

S. Kanzi, İ Sakallı, Eur. Phys. J. C

**81**, 501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09299-yarXiv:2102.06303 [hep-th]C. Ding, X. Chen, Chin. Phys. C

**45**(2), 025106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abce51arXiv:2008.10474 [gr-qc]C. Ding, C. Liu, R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, Eur. Phys. J. C

**80**(3), 178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7743-yarXiv:1910.02674 [gr-qc]J.M. Martin-Garcia, R. Portugal, L.R.U. Manssur, Comput. Phys. Commun.

**177**, 640–648 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2007.05.015arXiv:0704.1756 [cs.SC]

## Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (FUNCAP), the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Grants no 307556/2018-2 (RVM) and no 308979/2018-4 (CRM) for financial support.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Appendix: Some quantities

### Appendix: Some quantities

In this appendix, we list out the nonzero components of the Ricci tensor and the covariant derivative of \(b_{\mu \nu }\) to make checking Eqs. (1.5) and (1.6) easier for the readers. For the metric (1.1), they take the explicit form:

which at the limit \(\ell \rightarrow 0\) it vanishes, and additionally, we verify that the component \(R_{r\theta }\) is identically null. These results agree that the Kerr metric is Ricci flat in the absence of the Lorentz violation since it is the solution of the vacuum Einstein equations. Besides, the relevant covariant derivatives are given by

and

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Funded by SCOAP^{3}

## About this article

### Cite this article

Maluf, R.V., Muniz, C.R. Comment on “Greybody radiation and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumblebee gravity model”.
*Eur. Phys. J. C* **82**, 94 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10039-z

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10039-z