Abstract
We study \(dS_5\) vacua within matter-coupled \(N=4\) gauged supergravity in five dimensions using the embedding tensor formalism. With a simple ansatz for solving the extremization and positivity of the scalar potential, we derive a set of conditions for the gauged supergravity to admit \(dS_5\) as maximally symmetric background solutions. The results provide a new approach for finding \(dS_5\) vacua in five-dimensional \(N=4\) gauged supergravity and explain a number of notable features pointed out in previous works. These conditions also determine the form of the gauge groups to be \(SO(1,1)\times G_{\text {nc}}\) with \(G_{\text {nc}}\) being a non-abelian non-compact group. In general, \(G_{\text {nc}}\) can be a product of SO(1, 2) and a smaller non-compact group \({G^{\prime }}_{{\text {nc}}}\) together with (possibly) a compact group. The SO(1, 1) factor is gauged by one of the six graviphotons, that is singlet under \(SO(5)\sim USp(4)\) R-symmetry. The compact parts of SO(1, 2) and \({G^{\prime }}_{{\text {nc}}}\) are gauged by vector fields from the gravity and vector multiplets, respectively. In addition, we explicitly study \(dS_5\) vacua for a number of gauge groups and compute scalar masses at the vacua. As in the four-dimensional \(N=4\) gauged supergravity, all the \(dS_5\) vacua identified here are unstable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Finding de Sitter (dS) vacua, with a positive cosmological constant, is one of the most interesting areas in gauged supergravities due to their importance in cosmology [1,2,3] and the dS/CFT correspondence [4]. Unlike the AdS vacua which are rather common in gauged supergravities, dS vacua are rare and occur only for a specific form of gauge groups. Moreover, embedding these vacua from lower-dimensional effective theories in string/M-theory is a highly non-trivial task, see for example [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], and a recent review [15].
In four dimensions, de Sitter vacua are extensively studied due to their direct relevance for cosmology, see for example [16,17,18,19,20]. In other dimensions, much less is known about this type of vacua. In this paper, we are interested in \(dS_5\) vacua of \(N=4\) gauged supergravity coupled to vector multiplets constructed in [21, 22]. There are no \(dS_5\) vacua in pure \(N=4\) gauged supergravity of [23]. \(dS_5\) vacua of \(N=4\) gauged supergravity coupled to two vector multiplets have already appeared in [24]. From a number of explicit examples, it has been pointed out that gauge groups admitting \(dS_5\) vacua must contain non-compact abelian SO(1, 1) and non-compact non-abelian factors. To the best of our knowledge, these are the only known \(dS_5\) vacua in the framework of matter-coupled \(N=4\) gauged supergravity. There are also a number of \(dS_5\) vacua in the maximal \(N=8\) and the minimal \(N=2\) gauged supergravities [25,26,27,28,29]. However, most of these \(dS_5\) vacua are unstable except for a few examples in [29].
We will use the embedding tensor formalism to analyze the extremization and positivity of the scalar potential in terms of fermion-shift matrices. With a simple ansatz, we can derive a number of conditions the embedding tensor must satisfy in order for the scalar potential to admit a \(dS_5\) vacuum. In general, solving these conditions subject to the quadratic constraint will determine the form of possible gauge groups. The analysis and the resulting conditions are very similar to the conditions for the existence of maximally supersymmetric \(AdS_5\) vacua studied in [30]. In a sense, our results can be regarded as a \(dS_5\) analogue but are based on some assumption rather than supersymmetry. Although the conditions we impose are very restrictive, we will show that our results explicitly lead to the fact that the gauge groups must be of the form \(SO(1,1)\times G_{\text {nc}}\) with \(G_{\text {nc}}\) being a non-abelian and non-compact group as pointed out in [24]. In general, for \(G_{\text {nc}}\) being a semisimple group, \(G_{\text {nc}}\) can be a product of SO(2, 1) and a smaller non-compact group \({G^{\prime }}_{{\text {nc}}}\).
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we review relevant formulae for computing the scalar potential of \(N=4\) gauged supergravity in five dimensions coupled to vector multiplets in the embedding tensor formalism. In Sect. 3, we derive the conditions that the embedding tensor needs to satisfy in order for the scalar potential to admit \(dS_5\) vacua and determine a general form of gauge groups implied by these conditions. Some examples of these gauge groups are explicitly studied in Sect. 4, and conclusions and comments are given in Sect. 5. We also include an appendix containing useful identities for SO(5) gamma matrices and a collection of non-vanishing components of the embedding tensor for all gauge groups considered in this paper.
2 Five dimensional \(N=4\) gauged supergravity coupled to vector multiplets
In this section, we review five dimensional \(N=4\) gauged supergravity coupled to n vector multiplets. We will only focus on formulae relevant for finding vacuum solutions. The detailed construction can be found in [21, 22].
The \(N=4\) gravity multiplet consists of the graviton \(e^{{\hat{\mu }}}_\mu \), four gravities \(\psi _{\mu i}\), six vectors \(A^0\) and \(A_\mu ^m\), four spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) fields \(\chi _i\) and one real scalar \(\Sigma \), the dilaton. Space-time and tangent space indices are denoted respectively by \(\mu ,\nu ,\ldots =0,1,2,3,4\) and \({\hat{\mu }},{\hat{\nu }},\ldots =0,1,2,3,4\). The \(SO(5)\sim USp(4)\) R-symmetry indices are described by \(m,n=1,\ldots , 5\) for the SO(5) vector representation and \(i,j=1,2,3,4\) for the SO(5) spinor or USp(4) fundamental representation. The dilaton \(\Sigma \) can be considered as a coordinate on \(SO(1,1)\sim {\mathbb {R}}^+\) coset manifold.
The vector multiplet contains a vector field \(A_\mu \), four gaugini \(\lambda _i\) and five scalars \(\phi ^m\). The n vector multiplets will be labeled by indices \(a,b=1,\ldots , n\), and the component fields within these multiplets will be denoted by \((A^a_\mu ,\lambda ^{a}_i,\phi ^{ma})\). From both gravity and vector multiplets, there are in total \(6+n\) vector fields which will be collectively denoted by \(A^{\mathcal {M}}_\mu =(A^0_\mu ,A^M_\mu )=(A^0_\mu ,A^m_\mu ,A^a_\mu )\). The 5n scalar fields from the vector multiplets parametrize the \(SO(5,n)/SO(5)\times SO(n)\) coset. To describe this coset manifold, we introduce a coset representative \(\mathcal {V}_M^{\phantom {M}A}\) transforming under the global SO(5, n) and the local \(SO(5)\times SO(n)\) by left and right multiplications, respectively. We use indices \(M,N,\ldots =1,2,\ldots , 5+n\) for global SO(5, n) indices. The local \(SO(5)\times SO(n)\) indices \(A,B,\ldots \) will be split into \(A=(m,a)\). We can accordingly write the coset representative as
The matrix \(\mathcal {V}_M^{\phantom {M}A}\) is an element of SO(5, n) and satisfies the relation
with \(\eta _{MN}=\text {diag}(-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,1,\ldots ,1)\) being the SO(5, n) invariant tensor.
Gaugings are implemented by promoting a subgroup \(G_0\) of the full global symmetry \(G=SO(1,1)\times SO(5,n)\) to be a local symmetry. The most general gaugings can be described by using the embedding tensor. \(N=4\) supersymmetry allows three components of the embedding tensor denoted by \(\xi ^{M}\), \(\xi ^{MN}=\xi ^{[MN]}\) and \(f_{MNP}=f_{[MNP]}\) [22]. The embedding tensor leads to minimal coupling of various fields via the covariant derivative
in which \(\nabla _\mu \) is the usual space-time covariant derivative and \(t_{MN}=t_{[MN]}\) and \(t_0\) are generators of SO(5, n) and SO(1, 1), respectively. It should also be noted that \(\xi ^M\), \(\xi ^{MN}\) and \(f_{MNP}\) include the gauge coupling constants, and SO(5, n) indices \(M,N,\ldots \) are lowered and raised by \(\eta _{MN}\) and its inverse \(\eta ^{MN}\), respectively.
In term of the embedding tensor, gauge generators \({X_{\mathcal {M}\mathcal {N}}}^{\mathcal {P}}={(X_{\mathcal {M}})_{\mathcal {N}}}^{\mathcal {P}}\) are given by
To ensure that these generators form a closed subalgebra of G
the embedding tensor must satisfy the following quadratic constraint
Since we are only interested in maximally symmetric solutions, we will set all fields but the metric and scalars to zero. In this case, the bosonic Lagrangian of a general gauged \(N=4\) supergravity coupled to n vector multiplets can be written as
where e is the vielbein determinant. The scalar potential is given by
with \(M^{MN}\) being the inverse of a symmetric matrix \(M_{MN}\) defined by
\(M^{MNPQRS}\) is obtained from raising indices of \(M_{MNPQR}\) defined by
Equivalently, the scalar potential can also be written in terms of fermion-shift matrices as
or, after a contraction of i and j indices,
The fermion shift matrices are in turn defined by
where
We have explicitly shown the symmetry of each tensor for later convenience. Note also that lowering and raising of USp(4) indices \(i,j,\ldots \) with the symplectic form \(\Omega _{ij}\) and its inverse \(\Omega ^{ij}\) correspond to complex conjugate for example \(A_{1ij}=\Omega _{ik}\Omega _{jl}A_1^{kl}=(A_1^{ij})^*\).
\({\mathcal {V}_M}^{ij}\) is related to \({\mathcal {V}_M}^m\) by SO(5) gamma matrices \({\Gamma _{mi}}^j\). As in [30], we define \(\mathcal {V}_M^{\phantom {M}ij}\) by
where \(\Gamma ^{ij}_m=\Omega ^{ik}{\Gamma _{mk}}^j\). \({\mathcal {V}_M}^{ij}\) satisfies the following relations
Similarly, the inverse element \({\mathcal {V}_{ij}}^M\) can be written as
3 de Sitter vacua of \(N=4\) five-dimensional gauged supergravity
We now consider gauge groups that lead to de Sitter vacua. As in [30], it is useful to introduce “dressed” components of the embedding tensor
where, as in [30], \(\langle \,\,\, \rangle \) means the quantity inside is evaluated at the vacuum. Using the splitting of the index \(A=(m,a)\), we have the following components of the embedding tensor under the decomposition \(SO(5,n)\rightarrow SO(5)\times SO(n)\)
In subsequent analysis, we will determine the form of gauge groups that lead to \(dS_5\) vacua. With some assumption, the analysis is very similar to that of the supersymmetric \(AdS_5\) vacua studied in [30].
In order to have \(dS_5\) vacua, we require that
In terms of the fermion-shift matrices, these conditions read
There are various ways to satisfy these relations. To make the analysis tractable, we will restrict ourselves to the following two possibilities:
- 1.
\(\langle A_1^{ij} \rangle =0\), \(\langle A^{aij}_2 \rangle =0\) and \(\langle A^{ik}_2 A_{2jk} \rangle =\frac{1}{4}|\mu |^{2}\delta ^i_j\) with \(A_{2ij}\delta A^{ij}_2=0\).
- 2.
\(\langle A_1^{ij} \rangle =0\), \(\langle A^{ij}_2 \rangle =0\) and \(\langle A^{aik}_2 A^a_{2jk} \rangle =\frac{1}{4}|\mu |^{2}\delta ^{i}_j\) with \(A^a_{2ij}\delta A^{aij}_2=0\).
\(|\mu |^2\) denotes the cosmological constant, the value of the scalar potential at the vacuum \(V_0\).
3.1 \(\langle A_1^{ij} \rangle =0\), \(\langle A^{aij}_2\rangle =0\) and \(\langle A^{ik}_2 A_{2jk}\rangle =\frac{1}{4}|\mu |^{2}\delta ^{i}_{j}\)
We begin with the first possibility. Since \(A^{aij}_2\) consists of three representations of USp(4) namely 10, 5 and \(\mathbf {1}\) corresponding to \(\rho ^{a(ij)}\), \(\zeta ^{a[ij]}\) and \(\Omega ^{ij}\tau ^a\), respectively, the condition \(\langle A^{aij}_2\rangle =0\) then implies that these components must vanish separately
The condition \(\langle A^{ij}_1\rangle =0\) gives
Using the definitions in (16), we have
The conditions in (25) then imply that
due to the non-vanishing \(\langle \Sigma \rangle \) and \(\Gamma ^{ij}_m\) and \(\Gamma _{mn}^{ij}\) being all linearly independent. Using the first condition of the quadratic constraint (6), we find that
which implies \(\xi ^m=0\). Accordingly, we are left with \(\xi ^M=0\).
With \(\xi ^M=0\) together with (26), we have \(\tau ^{[ij]}=\Sigma ^{-1}\xi ^{m}\Gamma ^{ij}_m=0\) and
Using the identity given in (121) and the fact that \((A^{ij}_2)^*=A_2^{kl}\Omega _{ki}\Omega _{lj}\), we find, from \(A_2^{ik}A_{2jk}=\frac{1}{4}|\mu |^2 \delta ^i_j\),
which gives
In addition, the condition (26) gives
We can easily see that, apart from numerical differences, these conditions have a very similar structure to those for the existence of supersymmetric \(AdS_5\) vacua. However, we still need to check whether these conditions extremize the potential. Note that for the \(AdS_5\) case, the potential is automatically extremized since in this case we have
where we have introduced the variations of the coset representative \({\mathcal {V}_M}^A\) with respect to scalars \(\phi ^{ma}\)
With \(\langle A^{ij}_2\rangle =\langle A^{aij}_2\rangle =0\), we immediately see that \(\langle \delta V\rangle =-2\langle A_{1ij}\delta A_1^{ij}\rangle =0\).
However, in the present case, with \(\langle A^{ij}_1\rangle =\langle A^{aij}_2\rangle =0\), we find
where we have used the relation
We see that \(\langle \delta V\rangle =0\) implies \(\langle \rho ^{(ij)}\rangle =\langle A^{ij}_2\rangle =0\). The cosmological constant then vanishes, and there are no possible \(dS_5\) vacua.
It is now useful to note that if all the above conditions extremized the potential, the structure of the resulting gauge groups would be the same as in the \(AdS_5\) case namely \(U(1)\times H\) with H containing an SU(2) subgroup gauged by three of the graviphotons. Therefore, the same gauge group would give two types of vacua, \(AdS_5\) and \(dS_5\), with different ratios of the gauge coupling constants for the U(1) and H factors. According to the explicit form of the scalar potential studied in [31, 32], this is not the case. There is no \(dS_5\) vacuum for gauge groups of the form \(U(1)\times H\) for any values of the coupling constants precisely in agreement with the above result.
3.2 \(\langle A_1^{ij} \rangle =0\), \(\langle A^{ij}_2 \rangle =0\) and \(\langle A^{aik}_2 A^a_{2jk} \rangle =\frac{1}{4}|\mu |^{2}\delta ^i_j\)
We now consider the second possibility with \(\langle A_1^{ij} \rangle =\langle A^{ij}_2 \rangle =0\) and \(\langle A^{aik}_2 A^a_{2jk} \rangle =\frac{1}{4}|\mu |^{2}\delta ^i_j\). \(A^{ij}_2\) consists of a symmetric and an anti-symmetric part. To satisfy the condition \(\langle A^{ij}_2\rangle =0\), these two parts must separately vanish. This implies \(\tau ^{[ij]}=0\) or \(\xi ^m=0\), and, as in the previous case, the quadratic constraint \(\xi ^M\xi _M=0\) gives \(\xi ^a=0\). We again find that \(\xi ^M=0\).
With \(\xi ^M=0\), the conditions \(\langle A_1^{ij} \rangle =\langle A^{ij}_2 \rangle =0\) give
which implies
Using (27) and the identity in (121) together with
we find, after some manipulation, that the condition \(\langle A^{aik}_2 A^a_{2jk} \rangle =\frac{1}{4}|\mu |^{2}\delta ^i_j\) gives
After using (120), we arrive at
We then move to the extremization of the potential, \(\langle \delta V\rangle =2\langle A^a_{2ij}\delta A^{aij}_2\rangle =0\), which gives
and
With the relations
the first condition gives
From the definitions (16), we can easily derive the following relations
After some manipulation together with (116), we find that the condition (46) gives
where we have used the previous results \(\xi ^{mn}=0\) and \(f^{mnp}=0\).
We now need to find solutions to all of these conditions subject to the quadratic constraints (6). With \(\xi ^M=0\), the quadratic constraint simplifies considerably
By using SO(5, n) generators of the form \({(t_{MN})_P}^Q=\delta ^Q_{[M}\eta _{N]P}\), we find that the gauge generators in the fundamental representation of SO(5, n) are given by
where we have set \(\xi ^M=0\). Note also that, for \(\xi ^{M}=0\), the gauge group is entirely embedded in SO(5, n). The quadratic constraint then implies that \([X_0,X_M]=0\), so \(X_0\) generates an abelian factor. On the other hand, \(X_M\) in general generate a non-abelian group with structure constants \(f_{MNP}\), and the first quadratic constraint in (52) gives the corresponding Jacobi’s identity.
Using the relations \(\xi ^{mn}=f^{mnp}=0\), the second relation in (52) gives
We now see that the first condition in (545556) automatically solves (43). Using components (mnpq) of the first quadratic constraint in (52), we find from (44) that
We now study consequences of all the above conditions on the structure of gauge groups. First of all, using the relation (48) in (42), we find that
This result implies that, for \(|\mu |^2\ne 0\), we must have \(\xi ^{am}\ne 0\) and \(f^{amn}\ne 0\). Therefore, the abelian generator \(X_0\) corresponds to a non-compact group SO(1, 1), and the non-abelian part must be necessarily non-compact. This is in agreement with the result of [24] in which it has been pointed out, based on a few explicit examples, that only gauge groups of the form \(SO(1,1)\times G_{\text {nc}}\) lead to \(dS_5\) vacua. With a simple assumption, we are able to derive this result.
From Eq. (57), we see that \(\xi ^{am}\) and \(f^{amn}\) must be non-vanishing for different values of indices m and a. This also implies that gauge groups of the form \(SO(1,1)\times G_{\text {nc}}\) are only possible for \(n\ge 2\) (at least two different values of a) as shown by explicit computation in [24] that the existence of \(dS_5\) vacua requires at least two vector multiplets. We now determine possible gauge groups allowed by the remaining conditions.
We begin with the simplest possibility namely \(\xi ^{ab}=f_{mab}=f_{abc}=0\). These components are not constrained by the existence of \(dS_5\) vacua, so we can have \(dS_5\) vacua regardless of their values. Since in this case we have \(f_{abc}=0\), the compact part of \(G_{\text {nc}}\) must be an abelian SO(2) group. We find that \(f_{amn}\) must correspond to SO(2, 1) group. The full gauge group then takes the form of a product \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\).
For \(\xi ^{ab}=f_{abc}=0\) but \(f_{mab}\ne 0\), the quadratic constraint implies that \(f_{mab}\) and \(f_{amn}\) cannot have common indices. Therefore, these components generate two separate non-compact groups with \(f_{amn}\) corresponding to SO(2, 1) as in the previous case. Since the existence of \(dS_5\) vacua requires \(f_{mnp}=0\), the compact subgroup of the non-compact group corresponding to \(f_{mab}\) must be SO(2), hence \(f_{mab}\) generate another \(SO(2,1)'\) factor. However, it should be noted that the compact parts of the two SO(2, 1)’s are embedded in the matter and R-symmetry directions, respectively. The full gauge group in this case is then given by \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\times SO(2,1)'\).
For \(\xi ^{ab}=f_{mab}=0\) but \(f_{abc}\ne 0\), we have the following non-vanishing components of the embedding tensors
in which we have split indices as \(m=({\tilde{m}},m')\) and \(a=({\tilde{a}},a')\). In this case, \(f_{a'b'c'}\) together with \(f_{a'm'n'}\) form a non-compact group \({\tilde{G}}_{\text {nc}}\) whose compact subgroup \({\tilde{H}}_\text {c}\) is generated by \(f_{a'b'c'}\). The quadratic constraint gives the standard Jacobi’s identity for \({\tilde{H}}_\text {c}\). In general, there can be a subspace in which \(f_{a'b'c'}\) do not have common indices with \(f_{a'm'n'}\). We will denote these components as \(f_{a''b''c''}\) with \(f_{a''m'n'}=0\). In this case, \(f_{a''b''c''}\) form a separate compact group \(H_{\text {c}}\) while \(f_{a'm'n'}\) and \(f_{a'b'c'}\) still generate a smaller non-compact group \(G_{\text {nc}}\). The full gauge group can be written as \(SO(1,1)\times G_{\text {nc}}\times H_{\text {c}}\).
If in addition \(f_{m'a'b'}\ne 0\), we have an extra factor of \(SO(2,1)'\), so a general gauge group takes the form of
with the compact parts of SO(2, 1) and \(G_{\text {nc}}\) are embedded along the R-symmetry and matter directions, respectively.
The non-vanishing \(\xi ^{ab}\) on the other hand does not change the structure of the gauge groups.
4 \(dS_5\) vacua from different gauge groups
In this section, we will study \(N=4\) gauged supergravity with gauge groups that lead to \(dS_5\) vacua identified in the previous section. We will restrict ourselves to a simple case of \(\xi ^{ab}=f^{mab}=0\) given in (59) and consider only semisimple gauge groups. In general, the SO(1, 1) factor can be embedded as a diagonal subgroup \(SO(1,1)^{(d)}_{\text {diag}}\sim (SO(1,1)^1\times \ldots \times SO(1,1)^d)_{\text {diag}}\) in which each SO(1, 1) factor is characterized by the values of indices \({\tilde{m}}\) and \({\tilde{a}}\).
In order to have non-vanishing \(f_{m'n'a'}\), we must have \(d\le 3\) to allow for the antisymmetry in \(m'\) and \(n'\) indices since \(1\le m',n'\le 5-d\). An explicit form of the gauge generators is given by
Generators \(X_{m'}\) and \(X_{a'}\) correspond to non-compact and compact generators of \(G_{\text {nc}}\), respectively. Note also that we can have at most \(5-d\) non-compact generators for \(G_{\text {nc}}\). We now discuss possible gauge groups for different values of d.
For \(d=1\), \(G_{\text {nc}}\) is a non-compact subgroup of \(SO(4,n-1)\) with at most four non-compact generators. We can gauge the following groups
For \(d=2\) and \(d=3\), we have the following admissible gauge groups
We will explicitly study scalar potentials arising from these gauge groups and their \(dS_5\) vacua. In most of the following analysis, we mainly work in the case of \(n=5\) vector multiplets for definiteness with an exception of \(SO(1,1)\times SO(4,1)\) gauge group that requires \(n=7\). In addition, in many cases, we will consider only non-vanishing dilaton due to the complexity of including scalars from vector multiplets. In all of these gauge groups we have explicitly checked that the conditions \(\langle A^{ij}_1\rangle =\langle A^{ij}_2\rangle =0\) and \(\langle A^{aij}_2A^a_{2kj}\rangle =\frac{1}{4}V_0\delta ^i_k\) are satisfied. We note here that \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\) and \(SO(1,1)^{(2)}_{\text {diag}}\times SO(2,1)\) gauge groups have already been studied in [24]. However, all the remaining gauge groups are new and arise from our analysis given in the previous section.
To compute the scalar potential, we need an explicit form of the coset representative for \(SO(5,n)/SO(5)\times SO(n)\). It is convenient to define a basis of \(GL(5+n,{\mathbb {R}})\) matrices
in terms of which SO(5, n) non-compact generators are given by
To adopt the normalization used in [22] with
we will use a slightly different definition of \({\mathcal {V}_M}^{ij}\) and \({\mathcal {V}_{ij}}^M\)
The explicit representation of the SO(5) gamma matrices is chosen to be
where \(\sigma _i\), \(i=1,2,3\), are the usual Pauli matrices.
4.1 \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\) gauge group
We begin with the simplest possible gauge group \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\). The embedding of SO(1, 1) factor is given by
while the \(f_{MNP}\) describing the embedding of SO(2, 1) has the following independent non-vanishing component
This means that the compact part \(SO(2)\subset SO(2,1)\) is generated by \(X_8\) while the two noncompact generators are embedded in the R-symmetry directions \(M=2,3\). Note also that this embedding tensor manifestly satisfies the quadratic constraint (52).
At the vacuum, \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\) gauge symmetry will be broken to its compact subgroup SO(2). In principle, we can study the scalar potential for scalars which are singlets under this residual SO(2) symmetry. However, the number of these singlet scalars is rather large, 15 singlets in this case. Therefore, we will mainly analyze the scalar potential only to second-order in fluctuations of scalar fields and give the explicit form of the potential only for the dilaton \(\Sigma \) non-vanishing. With all scalars from vector multiplets set to zero, the scalar potential is given by
This potential admits a unique critical point at
The value of the dilaton \(\Sigma \) at the vacuum can be rescaled to \(\Sigma =1\) by setting \(g_2= g_1\) which gives the \(dS_5\) vacuum in a simple form
The linearized analysis of the full scalar potential for all 26 scalars shows that this is also the critical point of the full potential with scalar masses given by
The number in the subscripts of each mass value is the multiplicity of that mass value at the critical point, and the \(dS_5\) radius is given by \(L^2 = 6/V_0\). This \(dS_5\) critical point is unstable because of the negative mass value \(2(1-\sqrt{33})\). The mass value 16 corresponds to that of \(\Sigma \), and the nine massless scalars contain three Goldstone bosons of the symmetry breaking \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\rightarrow SO(2)\).
4.2 \(SO(1,1)^{(2)}_\text {diag}\times SO(2,1)\)
We now consider another embedding for the SO(1, 1) factor as a diagonal subgroup of \(SO(1,1)\times SO(1,1)\) generated by the non-compact generators \(Y_{41}\) and \(Y_{52}\) of SO(5, 5). The embedding tensor for SO(2, 1) remains the same as in the previous case. We will use the following non-vanishing components of the embedding tensor for the \(SO(1,1)^{(2)}_{\text {diag}}\)
The scalar potential for this gauging is given by
with a unique critical point at
We can again shift this critical point to the value \(\Sigma =1\) by setting \(g_2 = \sqrt{2}g_1\) and obtain the value of the cosmological constant
Scalar masses at this critical point are given by
Notice that all masses are quantized, and the \(dS_5\) vacuum is unstable because of the negative mass values \(-8\) and \(-6\). The value \(m^2L^2=16\) corresponds to that of \(\Sigma \). Three of the eight massless scalars correspond to the Goldstone bosons of the symmetry breaking \(SO(1,1)_\text {diag}\times SO(2,1)\rightarrow SO(2)\) at the vacuum.
4.3 \(SO(1,1)^{(3)}_\text {diag}\times SO(2,1)\)
In this case, the embedding tensor for SO(2, 1) remains the same as the previous two cases while the SO(1, 1) is a diagonal subgroup of \(SO(1,1)\times SO(1,1)\times SO(1,1)\). Non-vanishing components of the full embedding tensor are now given by
These give the following scalar potential for \(\Sigma \)
which admits a critical point at
After setting \(g_2 = \sqrt{3}g_1\), we find the cosmological constant
Scalar masses are given by
This \(dS_5\) vacuum is unstable due to the negative mass value \(\dfrac{2}{3}(5-\sqrt{201})\) with three massless scalars corresponding to the Goldstone bosons of the symmetry breaking \(SO(1,1)_{\text {diag}}\times SO(2,1)\rightarrow SO(2)\).
4.4 \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\times SO(2,1)\)
In this case, the four noncompact generators of \(SO(2,2)\sim SO(2,1)\times SO(2,1)\) group are embedded in the R-symmetry directions \(M=1,2,3,4\) while the compact \(SO(2)\times SO(2)\) generators are embedded in the matter directions \(M=8,9\). The embedding tensor for the SO(2, 2) factor can be chosen as
The embedding tensor for SO(1, 1) is still given by (69). Under the compact \(SO(2)\times SO(2)\) symmetry, there are five singlet scalars corresponding to the non-compact generators \(Y_{2a}\), \(a=1,2,\ldots ,5\). The coset representative can be written as
The scalar potential is given by
which admits only one critical point at
The scalar mass spectrum is
The \(dS_5\) vacuum is unstable because of the negative mass value \(2(3-\sqrt{17})\). The mass value 16 corresponds to that of the dilaton while the five scalars with zero mass correspond to the Goldstone bosons of the symmetry breaking \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\times SO(2,1)\rightarrow SO(2)\times SO(2)\).
4.5 \(SO(1,1)\times SO(3,1)\)
The embedding tensor for the SO(1, 1) factor is the same as in (69) while the SO(3, 1) part is gauged by the following components of the embedding tensor
The compact \(SO(3)\subset SO(3,1)\) is formed by generators \(X_8\), \(X_9\) and \(X_{10}\) along the matter multiplet directions.
There are five SO(3) singlet scalars from \(SO(5,5)/SO(5)\times SO(5)\) coset corresponding to the non-compact generators
With the coset representative
the scalar potential is given by
This potential admits a critical point at
We have not found other critical points from the above potential. As in other cases, we can bring this critical point to the value \(\Sigma =1\) by setting \(g_2 = \frac{g_1}{\sqrt{3}}\).
The scalar mass spectrum at this \(dS_5\) critical point is given by
which implies that the \(dS_5\) vacuum is unstable because of the negative mass values \(-20/3\) and \(\frac{2}{3}(7-\sqrt{145})\). There are four Goldstone bosons corresponding to the symmetry breaking \(SO(1,1)\times SO(3,1)\rightarrow SO(3)\).
We now move to a similar gauge group of the form \(SO(1,1)^{(2)}_\text {diag}\times SO(3,1)\) with the embedding tensor
Apart from a \(dS_5\) critical point with all scalars from vector multiplets vanishing, we have not found any other critical point. Therefore, to simplify the expression, we will give the potential with only the dilaton \(\Sigma \) non-vanishing
Choosing \(g_2 = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}g_1\), the \(dS_5\) critical point is given by
with the scalar mass spectrum
This \(dS_5\) vacuum is again unstable because of negative mass values \(-2/3\) and \(\dfrac{4}{3}(5-\sqrt{73})\). The mass value \(m^2L^2=16\) corresponds to that of \(\Sigma \).
4.6 \(SO(1,1)\times SU(2,1)\)
We now consider the last gauge group that can be embedded in SO(5, 5). Non-vanishing components of the embedding tensor for the non-abelian part SU(2, 1) are given by
Gauge generators \((X_7,X_8,X_9)\) and \(X_{10}\) correspond to the compact SU(2) and U(1), respectively.
Among the 25 scalars in \(SO(5,5)/SO(5)\times SO(5)\), there are two SU(2) singlets corresponding to the following non-compact generators \(Y_{51}\) and \(Y_{55}\). The coset representative can be written as
and, with the embedding tensor of SO(1, 1) given by (69), the scalar potential reads
There is only one critical point at
The scalar mass spectrum for all the 26 scalars is identical to that of \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,2)\) gauge group with the five massless scalars being the Goldstone bosons of the symmetry breaking \(SO(1,1)\times SU(2,1)\rightarrow SU(2)\times U(1)\).
4.7 \(SO(1,1)\times SO(4,1)\)
As a final example, we consider \(N=4\) gauged supergravity coupled to seven vector multiplets with \(SO(1,1)\times SO(4,1)\) gauge group. The compact part of SO(4, 1) containing six generators of SO(4) is embedded in the matter multiplet directions \(M=7,\ldots ,12\) while the 4 noncompact generators are embedded in the R-symmetry directions \(M=1,2,3,4\). The embedding tensor for SO(4, 1) is then given by
The embedding of SO(1, 1) is again given in (69).
Under \(SO(4)\subset SO(4,1)\) symmetry, there are three singlet scalars from \(SO(5,7)/SO(5)\times SO(7)\) coset corresponding to non-compact generators \(Y_{51}\), \(Y_{61}\) and \(Y_{62}-Y_{71}\). Using the coset representative
we find the scalar potential for this gauge group
which admits only one critical point at
Scalar masses at this vacuum are given by
which implies the instability of the \(dS_5\) critical point because of the negative mass value \(3-\sqrt{17}\). The five massless scalars are Goldstone bosons of the symmetry breaking \(SO(1,1)\times SO(4,1)\rightarrow SO(4)\).
5 Conclusions
In this paper, we have studied \(dS_5\) vacua of five-dimensional \(N=4\) gauged supergravity coupled to vector multiplets. By using a simple ansatz for solving the extremization and positivity of the scalar potential, we have derived a set of general conditions for determining the form of gauge groups admitting \(dS_5\) vacua as maximally symmetric backgrounds. In particular, these gauge groups must be of the form \(SO(1,1)\times SO(2,1)\times G_{\text {nc}}\times H_{\text {c}}\) with SO(1, 1) gauged by one of the graviphotons that is \(SO(5)_R\) singlet. \(G_{\text {nc}}\) is a non-compact group whose compact subgroup is gauged by vector fields in vector multiplets. On the other hand, the compact and non-compact parts of SO(2, 1) are embedded along the R-symmetry and matter directions, respectively. \(H_{\text {c}}\subset SO(n)\) is a compact group gauged by vector fields from the vector multiplets.
The results provide a new approach for finding \(dS_5\) vacua which could be of particular interest in various contexts such as in the dS/CFT correspondence and cosmology. We have also explicitly computed scalar potentials and studied \(dS_5\) vacua for a number of gauge groups. However, as in the \(N=4\) gauged supergravity in four dimensions, all of these \(dS_5\) vacua are unstable. Although the conditions we have imposed are very restrictive, the analysis given here might provide a starting point for a systematic classification of \(dS_5\) vacua in \(N=4\) gauged supergravity.
It would be interesting to carry out a similar analysis in gauged supergravities in other dimensions in particular in four-dimensional \(N=4\) gauged supergravity and compare with the results given in [17, 19]. Another direction would be to relate the known \(dS_5\) vacuum of \(N=8\) gauged supergravity with SO(3, 3) gauge group to \(dS_5\) solutions of \(N=4\) gauged supergravity considered here. On the other hand, embedding the \(dS_5\) vacua identified here in \(N=2\) gauged supergravity by truncating out some scalar fields might give stable \(dS_5\) vacua within \(N=2\) gauged supergravity as in a similar study in four-dimensional gauged supergravity [20]. Finally, relations between \(dS_4\) and \(dS_5\) vacua in \(N=4\) gauged supergravity similar to the \(N=2\) case studied in [28] also deserve further study. We hope to come back to these issues in future works.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This is a theoretical study and no experimental data has been listed.]
References
C.L. Bennet et al., First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: preliminary maps and basic results. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 1 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0302207
A.G. Riess et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998). arXiv:astro-ph/9805201
S. Perlmutter et al., Measurement of Omega and Lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999). arXiv:astro-ph/9812133
A. Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence. JHEP 10, 034 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0106113
G.W. Gibbons, Aspects of supergravity theories, in Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Related Topics, ed. by F. Del Aguila, J.A. deAzcarraga, L.E. Ibanez (World Scientific, 1985)
B. de Wit, D.J. Smit, N.D. Hari Dass, Residual supersymmetry of compactified D = 10 supergravity. Nucl. Phys. B 283, 165 (1987)
J. Maldacena, C. Nunez, Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 822 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0007018
P.K. Townsend, Cosmic acceleration and M-theory. arXiv:hep-th/0308149
B. de Carlos, A. Guarino, J.M. Moreno, Flux moduli stabilisation, supergravity algebras and no-go theorems. JHEP 01, 012 (2010). arXiv:0907.5580
B. de Carlos, A. Guarino, J.M. Moreno, Complete classification of Minkowski vacua in generalised flux models. JHEP 02, 076 (2010). arXiv:0911.2876
J. Blaback, U. Danielsson, G. Dibitetto, Fully stable dS vacua from generalised fluxes. JHEP 08, 054 (2013). arXiv:1301.7073
C. Damian, L.R. Diaz-Barron, O. Loaiza-Brito, M. Sabido, Slow-roll inflation in non-geometric flux compactification. JHEP 06, 109 (2013). arXiv:1302.0529
C. Damian, O. Loaiza-Brito, More stable de Sitter vacua from S-dual nongeometric fluxes. Phys. Rev. D 88, 046008 (2013). arXiv:1304.0792
R. Blumenhagen, C. Damian, A. Font, D. Herschmann, R. Sun, The flux-scaling scenario: de Sitter uplift and axion inflation. Fortsch. Phys. 64, 536–550 (2016). arXiv:1510.01522
U. Danielsson, T. van Riet, What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua? Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27, 12, 1830007 (2018). arXiv:1804.01120
C.M. Hull, Noncompact gaugings of \(N=8\) supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 142, 39 (1984)
M. de Roo, D.B. Westra, S. Panda, De Sitter solutions in \(N = 4\) matter coupled supergravity. JHEP 02, 003 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0212216
P. Fre, M. Trigiante, A. Van Proeyen, Stable de Sitter vacua from \(N = 2\) supergravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 19, 4167–4194 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0205119
M. de Roo, D.B. Westra, S. Panda, M. Trigiante, Potential and mass-matrix in gauged N = 4 supergravity. JHEP 11, 022 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0310187
D. Roest, J. Rosseel, de-Sitter in extended gauged supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 685, 201–207 (2010). arXiv:hep-th/0912.4440
G. Dall’Agata, C. Herrmann, M. Zagermann, General matter coupled \(N=4\) gauged supergravity in five-dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 612, 123–150 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0103106
J. Schon, M. Weidner, Gauged \(N=4\) supergravities. JHEP 05, 034 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0602024
L.J. Romans, Gauged \(N=4\) supergravity in five dimensions and their magnetovac backgrounds. Nucl. Phys. B 267, 433 (1986)
G. Smet, de Sitter space and supergravity in various dimensions. PhD thesis (2006)
M. Gunaydin, L.J. Romans, N.P. Warner, Compact and non-compact gauged supergravity theories in five dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 272, 598–646 (1986)
M. Gunaydin, M. Zagermann, The vacua of 5d, \(N = 2\) gauged Yang–Mills/Einstein/tensor supergravity: Abelian case. Phys. Rev. D 62, 044028 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0002228
O. Ogetbil, A general study of ground states in gauged \(N = 2\) supergravity theories with symmetric scalar manifolds in 5 dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 75, 065033 (2007). arXiv:hep-th/0612145
O. Ogetbil, Stable de Sitter vacua in 4 dimensional supergravity originating from 5 dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 78, 105001 (2008). arXiv:0809.0544
B. Cosemans, G. Smet, Stable de Sitter vacua in \(N = 2\), \(D = 5\) supergravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 22, 2359–2380 (2005). arXiv:hep-th/0502202
J. Louis, H. Triendl, M. Zagermann, \(N = 4\) supersymmetric \(AdS_5\) vacua and their moduli spaces. JHEP 10, 083 (2015). arXiv:1507.01623
H.L. Dao, P. Karndumri, Holographic RG flows and \(AdS_5\) black strings from 5D half-maximal gauged supergravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 137 (2019). arXiv:1811.01608
H.L. Dao, P. Karndumri, Supersymmetric \(AdS_5\) black holes and strings from \(5D\), \(N=4\) gauged supergravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 247 (2019). arXiv:1812.10122
Acknowledgements
P. K. is supported by The Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under Grant RSA6280022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Useful formulae
Appendix: Useful formulae
In this section, we collect some useful identities involving SO(5) gamma matrices which are useful in the analysis of the constraints on the embedding tensor. For convenience, we also give a summary of non-vanishing components of the embedding tensor for gauge groups considered in the main text.
1.1 A.1 SO(5) gamma matrices
The SO(5) gamma matrices \({\Gamma _{mi}}^j\) satisfy the Clifford algebra
The charge conjugation matrix \(C_{ij}\) and its inverse \(C^{ij}\) are related to the USp(4) symplectic form as follow
We can now define the gamma matrices with all indices up or down
Anti-symmetrized products of gamma matrices are defined as
In particular, we have the following relations
with the symmetry
Other useful identities are
with \(\epsilon _{12345}=+1\). The sign choices are related to the definition \(\Gamma _5=\pm \Gamma _1\Gamma _2\Gamma _3\Gamma _4\). In our calculations, we choose the convention with the upper sign.
1.2 A.2 Embedding tensor for some gauge groups with \(dS_5\) vacua
Examples of gauge groups that lead to \(dS_5\) vacua are listed in Table 1 along with non-vanishing components of the corresponding embedding tensor.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Funded by SCOAP3
About this article
Cite this article
Dao, H.L., Karndumri, P. \(dS_5\) vacua from matter-coupled 5D \(N=4\) gauged supergravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 804 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7317-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7317-z