Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Erratum to: Eur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:3147 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3147-1
There are several misprints to be corrected.
On page 4, sixth line after Eq. (6): the word “centrality” should be replaced by “head-on”.
On page 6, second paragraph: Fig. 1 should be addressed instead of Fig. 2.
On page 6, last paragraph: Fig. 2 should be addressed instead of Fig. 1.
On page 7, first paragraph: \(\varepsilon _{NN}^{0.40}\) should be given instead of \(\varepsilon _{NN}^{0.20}\).
On page 7, second paragraph, in parentheses: Fig. 1 should be addressed instead of Fig. 2.
On page 7, last paragraph: Fig. 4 should be addressed instead of Fig. 3.
On page 8, first paragraph: Fig. 1 should be addressed instead of Fig. 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3147-1.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Funded by SCOAP3 / License Version CC BY 4.0.
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, A.N., Sahoo, R., Sarkisyan, E.K.G. et al. Erratum to: Effective-energy budget in multiparticle production in nuclear collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3275-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3275-2