Abstract
Using the negative binomial distribution (NBD) and the generalized Glauber–Lachs (GGL) formula, we analyze the data on charged multiplicity distributions with pseudo-rapidity cutoffs η c at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV by ALICE Collaboration and at 0.2, 0.54, and 0.9 TeV by UA5 Collaboration. We confirm that the KNO scaling holds among the multiplicity distributions with η c =0.5 at \(\sqrt{s} = 0.2\)–2.36 TeV and estimate the energy dependence of a parameter 1/k in NBD and parameters 1/k and γ (the ratio of the average value of the coherent hadrons to that of the chaotic hadrons) in the GGL formula. Using empirical formulas for the parameters 1/k and γ in the GGL formula, we predict the multiplicity distributions with η c =0.5 at 7 and 14 TeV. Data on the second order Bose–Einstein correlations (BEC) at 0.9 TeV by ALICE Collaboration and 0.9 and 2.36 TeV by CMS Collaboration are also analyzed based on the GGL formula. Prediction for the third order BEC at 0.9 and 2.36 TeV are presented. Moreover, the information entropy is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 89 (2010)
G.J. Alner et al. (UA5 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 160, 193 (1985)
R.E. Ansorge et al. (UA5 Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 43, 357 (1989)
J.F. Grosse-Oetringhaus, K. Reygers, J. Phys. G 37, 083001 (2010)
Ch. Fuglesang, in Multiparticle Dynamics-Festschrift for Leon Van Hove and Proceedings, La Thuile, Italy (1990)
Z. Koba, H.B. Nielsen, P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 40, 317 (1972)
M. Biyajima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 966 (1983) [Addendum-ibid. 70, 1468 (1983)]
M. Biyajima, Phys. Lett. 137B, 225 (1984) [Addendum-ibid. 140B, 435 (1984)]
M. Biyajima, N. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. B 143, 463 (1984)
K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 345 (2010)
K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration), arXiv:1007.0516 [hep-ex]
V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 032001 (2010)
R.J. Glauber, in Proceedings of Physics of Quantum Electronics, ed. by P.L. Kelley et al. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965), p. 788
G. Lachs, Phys. Rev. 138, B1012 (1965)
G. Goldhaber, S. Goldhaber, W.Y. Lee, A. Pais, Phys. Rev. 120, 300 (1960)
M. Biyajima, A. Bartl, T. Mizoguchi, O. Terazawa, N. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 84, 931 (1990) [Addendum-ibid. 88, 157 (1992)]
R.M. Weiner, Bose–Einstein Correlations in Particle and Nuclear Physics: A Collection of Reprints (Wiley, Chichester, 1997)
G. Alexander, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 481 (2003)
A. Giovannini, R. Ugoccioni, Phys. Rev. D 59, 094020 (1999) [Erratum-ibid. D 69, 059903 (2004)]
R. Shimoda, M. Biyajima, N. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 89, 697 (1993)
N. Neumeister et al. (UA1-Minimum Bias-Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 275, 186 (1992). In their analyses an exponential form should read \(r=R\sqrt{n(n-1)/2}\) in higher order n
V. Simak, M. Sumbera, I. Zborovsky, Phys. Lett. B 206, 159 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mizoguchi, T., Biyajima, M. Analyses of multiplicity distributions with η c and Bose–Einstein correlations at LHC by means of generalized Glauber–Lachs formula. Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 1061–1069 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1505-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1505-1