Abstract
We highlight issues which are often underestimated in the experimental analyses on quarkonium polarization: the relation between the parameters of the angular distributions and the angular momentum composition of the quarkonium, the importance of the choice of the reference frame, the interplay between observed decay and production kinematics, and the consequent influence of the experimental acceptance on the comparison between experimental measurements and theoretical calculations. Given the puzzles raised by the available experimental results, new measurements must provide more detailed information, such that physical conclusions can be derived without relying on model-dependent assumptions. We describe a frame-invariant formalism which minimizes the dependence of the measurements on the experimental acceptance, facilitates the comparison with theoretical calculations, and probes systematic effects due to experimental biases. This formalism is a direct and generic consequence of the rotational invariance of the dilepton decay distribution and is independent of any assumptions specific to particular models of quarkonium production. The use of this improved approach, which exploits the intrinsic multidimensionality of the problem, will significantly contribute to a faster progress in our understanding of quarkonium production, especially if adopted as a common analysis framework by the LHC experiments, which will soon perform analyses of quarkonium polarization in proton-proton collisions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
N. Brambilla et al. (QWG Coll.), CERN Yellow Report 2005-005, hep-ph/0412158, and references therein
F. Abe et al. (CDF Coll.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 572 (1997)
G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, G.P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1125 (1995)
G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, G.P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5853E (1997)
J.P. Lansberg, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 693 (2009)
M. Beneke, M. Krämer, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5269 (1997)
A.K. Leibovich, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4412 (1997)
E. Braaten, B.A. Kniehl, J. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 62, 094005 (2000)
A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Coll.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 132001 (2007)
P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, J. Seixas, H.K. Wöhri, J. High Energy Phys. 10, 004 (2008)
P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, J. Seixas, H.K. Wöhri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 151802 (2009)
D. Acosta et al. (CDF Coll.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 161802 (2002)
V.M. Abazov et al. (D0 Coll.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 182004 (2008)
C.N. Brown et al. (E866 Coll.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2529 (2001)
T. Affolder et al. (CDF Coll.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2886 (2000)
C.S. Lam, W.K. Tung, Phys. Rev. D 18, 2447 (1978)
M. Artuso et al. (CLEO Coll.), Phys. Rev. D 80, 112003 (2009)
T.A. Armstrong et al. (E760 Coll.), Phys. Rev. D 48, 3037 (1993)
M. Ambrogiani et al. (E835 Coll.), Phys. Rev. D 65, 052002 (2002)
M. Ambrogiani et al. (E835 Coll.), Phys. Lett. B 610, 177 (2005)
E. Braaten, T.C. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1673 (1993)
H. Fritzsch, Phys. Lett. B 67, 217 (1977)
F. Halzen, Phys. Lett. B 69, 105 (1977)
K. Gottfried, J.D. Jackson, Nuovo Cimento 33, 309 (1964)
J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2219 (1977)
D.M. Brink, G.R. Satchler, Angular Momentum, 3rd edn. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993)
P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, J. Seixas, Phys. Rev. D 81, 111502(R) (2010)
P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, J. Seixas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 061601 (2010)
E. Braaten, D. Kang, J. Lee, C. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014025 (2009)
S. Falciano et al. (NA10 Coll.), Z. Phys. C 31, 513 (1986)
J.S. Conway et al. (E615 Coll.), Phys. Rev. D 39, 92 (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Faccioli, P., Lourenço, C., Seixas, J. et al. Towards the experimental clarification of quarkonium polarization. Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 657–673 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1420-5
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1420-5