Skip to main content
Log in

Emerge of scaling in project schedules

  • Regular Article - Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A project schedule contains a network of activities, the activity durations, the early and late finish dates for each activity, and the associated total float or slack times, the difference between the late and early dates. Here I show that the distribution of activity durations and total floats of construction project schedules exhibit a power law scaling. The power law scaling of the activity durations is explained by a historical process of specialization fragmenting old activities into new activities with shorter duration. In contrast, the power law scaling of the total floats distribution across activities is determined by the activity network. I demonstrate that the power law scaling of the activity duration distribution is essential to obtain a good estimate of the project delay distribution, while the actual total float distribution is less relevant. Finally, using extreme value theory and scaling arguments, I provide a mathematical proof for reference class forecasting for the project delay distribution. The project delay cumulative distribution function is \(G(z) = \exp ( - (z_c/z)^{1/s})\), where \(s>0\) and \(z_c>0\) are shape and scale parameters. Furthermore, if activity delays follow a lognormal distribution, as the empirical data suggests, then \(s=1\) and \(z_c \sim N^{0.20}d_{\max }^{1+0.20(1-\gamma _d)}\), where N is the number of activities, \(d_{\max }\), the maximum activity duration in units of days and \(\gamma _d\), the power law exponent of the activity duration distribution. These results offer new insights about project schedules, reference class forecasting and delay risk analysis.

Graphic abstract

A process of activities duration fragmentation explains the emergence of scaling in the activities duration distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The projects in the Nodes & Links contain sensitive information about the associated sources. While we can release statistics and analyses about that data, we are not authorized to release the raw schedule data. The code for the duplication-split model is available at github.com/av2atgh/red.

References

  1. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge(PMBOK Guide). PMI Global Standard, 4th edn. (Project Management Institute, 2010)

  2. M. Vanhoucke, Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling: Baseline Scheduling, Risk Analysis and Project Control (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Ellinas, The Domino effect: an empirical exposition of systemic risk across project networks. Prod. Oper. Manage. 28, 63–81 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Santolini, C. Ellinas, C. Nicolaides, Uncovering the fragility of large-scale engineering projects. EPJ Data Sci. 10(1), 36 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Pozzana, C. Ellinas, G. Kalogridis, K. Sakellariou, Spreading of performance fluctuations on real-world project networks. Appl. Network Sci. 6, 25 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Vazquez, I. Pozzana, G. Kalogridis, C. Ellinas, Activity networks determine project performance. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 509 (2023)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. P.L. Krapivsky, E. Ben-Naim, Scaling and multiscaling in models of fragmentation. Phys. Rev. E 50, 3502–3507 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Sotolongo-Costa, Y. Moreno-Vega, J.J. Lloveras-González, J.C. Antoranz, Criticality in droplet fragmentation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 42–45 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung Eun Park, Schedule delays of major projects: what should we do about it? Transp. Rev. 41(6), 814–832 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Vazquez, Tropical approximation to finish time of activity networks. Phys. Rev. E 106, L012301 (2022)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. David Hulett, Practical Schedule Risk Analysis (Routledge, London, 2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Vazquez, C. Marasinou, G. Kalogridis, C. Ellinas, Activity delay patterns in project networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 637, 129570 (2024)

  13. S.I. Resnick, Extreme Values, Regular Variation and Point Processes Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. (Springer, New York, NY, 1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Flyvbjerg, From Nobel Prize to Project Management: Getting Risks Right. Proj. Manage. J. 37(3), 5–15 (2006)

  15. A. Natarajan, Reference class forecasting and machine learning for improved offshore oil and gas megaproject planning: methods and application. Proj. Manage. J. 53(5), 456–484 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Flyvbjerg, A. Budzier, J.S. Lee, M. Keil, D. Lunn, D.W. Bester, The empirical reality of it project cost overruns: discovering a power-law distribution. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 39(3), 607–639 (2022)

  17. R. Baerenbold, Reducing risks in megaprojects: the potential of reference class forecasting. Project Leadership Soc. 4, 100103 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Liao, Z. Peng, Convergence rates of limit distribution of maxima of lognormal samples. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 395(2), 643–653 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank the data science team at Nodes & Links, in particular Hidayet Zaimaga and Georgios Kalogridis, for the generation of the construction project schedules database.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Nodes & Links Ltd provided support in the form of salary for A.V., but did not have any additional role in the conceptualization of the study, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.V. conceptualized and executed the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexei Vazquez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vazquez, A. Emerge of scaling in project schedules. Eur. Phys. J. B 97, 44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00676-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00676-6

Navigation