Abstract
Understanding the dynamics of opinions, preferences and of culture as whole requires more use of empirical data than has been done so far. It is clear that an important role in driving this dynamics is played by social influence, which is the essential ingredient of many quantitative models. Such models require that all traits are fixed when specifying the “initial cultural state”. Typically, this initial state is randomly generated, from a uniform distribution over the set of possible combinations of traits. However, recent work has shown that the outcome of social influence dynamics strongly depends on the nature of the initial state. If the latter is sampled from empirical data instead of being generated in a uniformly random way, a higher level of cultural diversity is found after long-term dynamics, for the same level of propensity towards collective behavior in the short-term. Moreover, if the initial state is randomized by shuffling the empirical traits among people, the level of long-term cultural diversity is in-between those obtained for the empirical and uniformly random counterparts. The current study repeats the analysis for multiple empirical data sets, showing that the results are remarkably similar, although the matrix of correlations between cultural variables clearly differs across data sets. This points towards robust structural properties inherent in empirical cultural states, possibly due to universal laws governing the dynamics of culture in the real world. The results also suggest that this dynamics might be characterized by criticality and involve mechanisms beyond social influence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. Urry, Theor. Cult. Soc. 22, 1 (2005)
D. Lazer, A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A.L. Barabási, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, G. King, M. Macy, D. Roy, M. Van Alstyne, Science 323, 721 (2009)
P.A. Grabowicz, J.J. Ramasco, E. Moro, J.M. Pujol, V.M. Eguiluz, PLOS ONE 7, 1 (2012)
J.-P. Onnela, J. Saramäki, J. Hyvönen, G. Szabó, M.A. de Menezes, K. Kaski, A.-L. Barabási, J. Kertész, New J. Phys. 9, 179 (2007)
A. Ferligoj, L. Kronegger, F. Mali, T.A.B. Snijders, P. Doreian, Scientometrics 104, 985 (2015)
S. Wasserman, K. Faust, Social network analysis: methods and applications (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994)
D. Easley, J. Kleinberg, Networks crowds and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010)
C. Kadushin, Understanding social networks: theories, concepts and findings (Oxford University Press, New York, 2012)
P. Holme, J. Saramäki, Phys. Rep. 519, 97 (2012) [Temporal Networks]
P. Sobkowicz, J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 12, 11 (2009)
C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009)
S. Galam, S. Moscovici, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 21, 49 (1991)
R. Axelrod, J. Confl. Resolut. 41, 203 (1997)
K. Klemm, V.M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 045101 (2003)
K. Klemm, V.M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026120 (2003)
M.N. Kuperman, Phys. Rev. E 73, 046139 (2006)
A. Flache, M.W. Macy, Local convergence and global diversity: the robustness of cultural homophily, arXiv:physics/0701333 (2007)
J.C. González-Avella, M.G. Cosenza, K. Tucci, Phys. Rev. E 72, 065102 (2005)
D. Centola, J.C. González-Avella, V.M. Eguíluz, M.S. Miguel, J. Confl. Resolut. 51, 905 (2007)
J. Pfau, M. Kirley, Y. Kashima, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 392, 381 (2013)
F. Battiston, V. Nicosia, V. Latora, M.S. Miguel, Sci. Rep. 7, 1809 (2017)
A. Stivala, Y. Kashima, M. Kirley, Phys. Rev. E 94, 032303 (2016)
L. Valori, F. Picciolo, A. Allansdottir, D. Garlaschelli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 1068 (2012)
A. Stivala, G. Robins, Y. Kashima, M. Kirley, Sci. Rep. 4, 4870 (2014)
R. Cont, J.-P. Bouchaud, Macroecon. Dyn. 4, 170 (2000)
J. Castner, Measures of cognitive distance and diversity, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2477484, 2014
M. Sherif, C.I. Hovland, Social judgment: assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1961)
J. Lorenz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18, 1819 (2007)
R. García-Gavilanes, Y. Mejova, D. Quercia, Twitter ain’t without frontiers: economic, social, and cultural boundaries in international communication, in Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing, CSCW ’14 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2014) pp. 1511–1522
F. Barth, Ethnic groups and boundaries (Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1969)
R. Boyd, P.J. Richardson, The origin and evolution of cultures (Oxford University Press, New York, 2005)
J.-P. Onnela, F. Reed-Tsochas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 18375 (2010)
J. Ratkiewicz, S. Fortunato, A. Flammini, F. Menczer, A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 158701 (2010)
S. Fortunato, C. Castellano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 138701 (2007)
B.K. Chakrabarti, A. Chakrabarti, A. Chaterjee, Econophysics and sociophysics: trends and perspectives (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2006)
S. Sinha, A. Chatterjee, A. Chakraborti, B.K. Chakraborti, Econophysics: an introduction (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2010)
C. Castellano, M. Marsili, A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3536 (2000)
K. Reif, A. Melich, Euro-barometer 38.1: consumer protection and perceptions of science and technology, November 1992, https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06045.v2, 1995
T.W. Smith, P. Marsden, M. Hout, J. Kim, General social surveys, 1993 ed., http://gss.norc.org/get-the-data/spss, 1972–2012
L. Lugo, S. Stencel, J. Green, S. Gregory et al., U.S. religious landscape survey. Religious beliefs and practices: diverse and politically relevant, http://www.pewforum.org/2008/06/01/, 2008
K. Goldberg, T. Roeder, D. Gupta, C. Perkins, Inf. Retr. 4, 133 (2001)
P. Bak, C. Tang, K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987)
M. Thompson, R.J. Ellis, A. Wildavsky, Cultural theory (Westview Press, Boulder, 1990)
E. Fehr, K. Hoff, Econ. J. 121, F396 (2011)
A. Cohn, E. Fehr, M.A. Marechal, Nature 516, 86 (2014)
A. Cohn, J. Engelmann, E. Fehr, M. André Maréchal, Am. Econ. J. 105, 860 (2015)
S. Galam, Eur. Phys. J. B: Condens. Matter Complex Syst. 25, 403 (2002)
S. Galam, Phys. Rev. E 71, 046123 (2005)
P. Sobkowicz, Opinion dynamics model based on cognitive biases, arXiv:1703.01501v1 (2017)
N.E. Friedkin, A.V. Proskurnikov, R. Tempo, S.E. Parsegov, Science 354, 321 (2016)
S. Galam, A.C.R. Martins, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012108 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Băbeanu, AI., Talman, L. & Garlaschelli, D. Signs of universality in the structure of culture. Eur. Phys. J. B 90, 237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2017-80337-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2017-80337-7