Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring economic complexity of countries and products: which metric to use?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluating the economies of countries and their relations with products in the global market is a central problem in economics, with far-reaching implications to our theoretical understanding of the international trade as well as to practical applications, such as policy making and financial investment planning. The recent Economic Complexity approach aims to quantify the competitiveness of countries and the quality of the exported products based on the empirical observation that the most competitive countries have diversified exports, whereas developing countries only export few low quality products – typically those exported by many other countries. Two different metrics, Fitness-Complexity and the Method of Reflections, have been proposed to measure country and product score in the Economic Complexity framework. We use international trade data and a recent ranking evaluation measure to quantitatively compare the ability of the two metrics to rank countries and products according to their importance in the network. The results show that the Fitness-Complexity metric outperforms the Method of Reflections in both the ranking of products and the ranking of countries. We also investigate a generalization of the Fitness-Complexity metric and show that it can produce improved rankings provided that the input data are reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (G. Bell and sons, 1891)

  2. P.M. Romer, J. Political Economy 98, S71 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G.M. Grossman, E. Helpman, Rev. Econ. Stud. 58, 43 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.A. Hidalgo, R. Hausmann, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 10570 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Tacchella, M. Cristelli, G. Caldarelli, A. Gabrielli, L. Pietronero, Sci. Rep. 2, 723 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Brin, L. Page, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst. 30, 107 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Hausmann, C.A. Hidalgo, The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity (MIT Press, 2014)

  8. J. Felipe, U. Kumar, A. Abdon, M. Bacate, Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 23, 36 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Poncet, F.S. De Waldemar, World Development 51, 104 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Cheng, T. Dongfeng, L. Xiangqian, The hidden capabality network of product space, in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI) (IEEE, 2013), pp. 567–571

  11. M. Cristelli, A. Gabrielli, A. Tacchella, G. Caldarelli, L. Pietronero, PLoS One 8, e70726 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Caldarelli, M. Cristelli, A. Gabrielli, L. Pietronero, A. Scala, A. Tacchella, PLoS One 7, e47278 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Tacchella, M. Cristelli, G. Caldarelli, A. Gabrielli, L. Pietronero, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 37, 1683 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Battiston, M. Cristelli, A. Tacchella, L. Pietronero, Complexity Economics 1, 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Allesina, M. Pascual, PLoS Computational Biology 5, e1000494 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Domínguez-García, M.A. Muñoz, Sci. Rep. 5, 8182 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.C. Feenstra, R.E. Lipsey, H. Deng, A.C. Ma, H. Mo, NBER Working Paper 11040, 2005

  18. C.A. Hidalgo, B. Klinger, A.L. Barabási, R. Hausmann, Science 317, 482 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Vidmer, A. Zeng, M. Medo, Y.C. Zhang, Physica A 436, 188 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Balassa, The Manchester School 33, 99 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Cristelli, A. Tacchella, L. Pietronero, PLoS One 10, e0117174 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Cimini, A. Gabrielli, F.S. Labini, PLoS One 9, e113470 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Berkhin, Internet Mathematics 2, 73 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Pugliese, A. Zaccaria, L. Pietronero, arXiv:1410.0249 (2014)

  25. J. Bascompte, P. Jordano, C.J. Melián, J.M. Olesen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 9383 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Bascompte, Science 329, 765 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Ghoshal, A.L. Barabási, Nat. Commun. 2, 394 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. L. Lü, Y.C. Zhang, C.H. Yeung, T. Zhou, PLoS One 6, e21202 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Sebastian Mariani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mariani, M.S., Vidmer, A., Medo, M. et al. Measuring economic complexity of countries and products: which metric to use?. Eur. Phys. J. B 88, 293 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2015-60298-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2015-60298-7

Keywords

Navigation