Skip to main content
Log in

Bundle versus network conductivity of carbon nanotubes separated by type

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report wide-range optical investigations on transparent conducting networks made from separated (semiconducting, metallic) and reference (mixed) single-walled carbon nanotubes, complemented by transport measurements. Comparing the intrinsic frequency-dependent conductivity of the nanotubes with that of the networks, we conclude that higher intrinsic conductivity results in better transport properties, indicating that the properties of the nanotubes are at least as much important as the contacts. We find that HNO3 doping offers a larger improvement in transparent conductive quality than separation. Spontaneous dedoping occurs in all samples but is most effective in films made of doped metallic tubes, where the sheet conductance returns close to its original value within 24 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Gruner, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 3533 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D.S. Hecht, L. Hu, G. Irvin, Adv. Mater. 23, 1482 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A.A. Green, M.C. Hersam, Nano Lett. 8, 1417 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Lu, M.J. Meziani, L. Cao, Y.P. Sun, Langmuir 27, 4339 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Blackburn, T.M. Barnes, M.C. Beard, Y.H. Kim, R.C. Tenent, T.J. McDonald, B. To, J. Coutts, M.J. Heben, ACS Nano 2, 1266 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T.M. Barnes, J.L. Blackburn, J. van de Lagemaat, T.J. Coutts, M.J. Heben, ACS Nano 2, 1968 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.S. Fuhrer, J. Nygard, L. Shih, M. Forero, Y.-G. Yoon, M.S.C. Mazzoni, H.J. Choi, J. Ihm, S.G. Louie, A. Zettl, P.L. McEuen, Science 288, 494 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.P. Garrett, I.N. Ivanov, R.A. Gerhardt, A.A. Puretzky, D.B. Geohegan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 163105 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Kamarás, Á. Pekker, B. Botka, H. Hu, S. Niyogi, M.E. Itkis, R.C. Haddon, Phys. Stat. Sol. B 247, 2754 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. www.nanointegris.com

  11. www.carbonsolution.com/products/p2-swnt.html

  12. Z.C. Wu, Z.H. Chen, X. Du, J.M. Logan, J. Sippel, M. Nikolou, K. Kamaras, J.R. Reynolds, D.B. Tanner, A.F. Hebard, A.G. Rinzler, Science 305, 1273 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Á. Pekker, K. Kamarás, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075475 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Zhou, J. Vavro, N.M. Nemes, J.E. Fischer, F. Borondics, K. Kamarás, D.B. Tanner, Phys. Rev. B 71, 205423 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Keilmann, R. Hillenbrand, in Nano-Optics and near-field optical microscopy, edited by D. Richards, A. Zayats (Artech House, Boston, London, 2009), p. 235

  16. N. Ocelic, A. Huber, R. Hillenbrand, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 101124 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Amarie, P. Zaslansky, Y. Kajihara, E. Griesshaber, W. Schmahl, F. Keilmann, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 3, 312 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Cvitkovic, N. Ocelic, R. Hillenbrand, Nano Lett. 7, 3177 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Hillenbrand, F. Keilmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3029 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. van der Pauw, Philips Res. Rep. 13, 1 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Bekyarova, M.E. Itkis, N. Cabrera, B. Zhao, A. Yu, J. Gao, R.C. Haddon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 5990 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Borondics, K. Kamarás, M. Nikolou, D.B. Tanner, Z. Chen, A.G. Rinzler, Phys. Rev. B 74, 045431 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Matsunaga, K. Matsuda, Y. Kanemitsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 037404 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Miyata, K. Yanagi, Y. Maniwa, H. Kataura, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 3591 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Kazaoui, N. Minami, R. Jacquemin, H. Kataura, Y. Achiba, Phys. Rev. B 60, 13339 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Hennrich, R. Wellmann, S. Malik, S. Lebedkin, M.M. Kappes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 178 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. V. Skákalová, A.B. Kaiser, Y.S. Woo, S. Roth, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085403 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Znidarsic, A. Kaskela, P. Laiho, M. Gaberscek, Y. Ohno, A.G. Nasibulin, E.I. Kauppinen, A. Hassanien, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 13324 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H.Z. Geng, K.K. Kim, K.P. So, Y.S. Lee, Y. Chang, Y.H. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 7758 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Á. Pekker, K. Kamarás, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 054318 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. V.K. Jain, A.P. Kulshreshtha, Sol. Energy Mater. 4, 151 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. R.G. Gordon, MRS Bull. 25, 52 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. T.M. Barnes, M.O. Reese, J.D. Bergeson, B.A. Larsen, J.L. Blackburn, M.C. Beard, J. Bult, J. van de Lagemaat, Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 353 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katalin Kamarás.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tóháti, H.M., Pekker, Á., Pataki, B.Á. et al. Bundle versus network conductivity of carbon nanotubes separated by type. Eur. Phys. J. B 87, 126 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2014-41103-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2014-41103-9

Keywords

Navigation