Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of attachment strategies on bipartite networks

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bipartite systems show remarkable variations in their topological asymptotic properties, e.g., in their degree distribution. Such variations depend on the underlying growth dynamics. A scenario of particular importance is when the two partitions of the bipartite structure do not grow at an equal rate. Here, we focus on the case where one of the partitions can be assumed to be fixed while the other partition grows in time as observed in the codon-gene or alphabet-word network. We show that subtle changes in growth dynamics, particularly in the attachment kernel, can lead to drastic changes of the emergent topological properties. We present a detail analysis of various growth strategies, including sequential and parallel addition of nodes, as well as with and without replacement attachment kernels. Analytical results have been compared with stochastic simulations as well as with real systems showing in all cases an excellent agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.E.J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016131 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M.E.J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A.L. Barabási, H. Jeong, R. Ravasz, Z. Néda, T. Vicsek, A. Schubert, Physica A 311, 590 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Lambiotte, M. Ausloos, Phys. Rev. E 72, 066117 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A.L. Barabási, H. Jeong, Z. Neda, E. Ravasz, A. Schubert, T. Vicsek, Physica A 311, 3 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.H. Strogatz, Nature 410, 268 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Caldarelli, M. Catanzaro, Physica A 338, 98 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J.J. Ramasco, S.N. Dorogovtsev, R. Pastor-Satorras, Phys. Rev. E 70, 036106 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Albert, A.L. Barabási, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5234 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Peltomäki, M. Alava, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. 1, P01010 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A.L. Barabási, R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. L.A.N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Barthélémy, H.E. Stanley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 11149 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Li, B.-Y. Gu, L. Chen, Complex Sciences, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 4, 640 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Choudhury, N. Ganguly, A. Maiti, A. Mukherjee, L. Brusch, A. Deutsch, F. Peruani, Phys. Rev. E 81, 036103 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Peruani, M. Choudhury, A. Mukherjee, N. Ganguly, Europhys. Lett. 79, 28001 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Mukherjee, M. Choudhury, A. Basu, N. Ganguly, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 16, 157 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Animesh Mukherjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganguly, N., Saha, S., Maiti, A. et al. Effect of attachment strategies on bipartite networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 86, 287 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-30662-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-30662-x

Keywords

Navigation