Abstract.
In this paper, we study cluster synchronization in general bi-directed networks of nonidentical clusters, where all nodes in the same cluster share an identical map. Based on the transverse stability analysis, we present sufficient conditions for local cluster synchronization of networks. The conditions are composed of two factors: the common inter-cluster coupling, which ensures the existence of an invariant cluster synchronization manifold, and communication between each pair of nodes in the same cluster, which is necessary for chaos synchronization. Consequently, we propose a quantity to measure the cluster synchronizability for a network with respect to the given clusters via a function of the eigenvalues of the Laplacian corresponding to the generalized eigenspace transverse to the cluster synchronization manifold. Then, we discuss the clustering synchronous dynamics and cluster synchronizability for four artificial network models: (i) p-nearest-neighborhood graph; (ii) random clustering graph; (iii) bipartite random graph; (iv) degree-preferred growing clustering network. From these network models, we are to reveal how the intra-cluster and inter-cluster links affect the cluster synchronizability. By numerical examples, we find that for the first model, the cluster synchronizability regularly enhances with the increase of p, yet for the other three models, when the ratio of intra-cluster links and the inter-cluster links reaches certain quantity, the clustering synchronizability reaches maximal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Pikovsky, M. Roseblum, J. Kurths, Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences (Cambridge University Press, 2001)
S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, D.-U. Hwang, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006)
X.F. Wang, G. Chen, IEEE Circ. Syst. Mag. 3, 6 (2003)
H. Fujisaka, T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 32 (1983)
H. Fujisaka, T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72, 885 (1984)
V.S. Afraimovich, N.N. Verichev, M.I. Rabinovich, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Radiofiz. 29, 795 (1986)
S.H. Strogatz, I. Stewart, Sci. Amer. 269, 102 (1993)
L.M. Pecora, T.L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990)
J.F. Heagy, T.L. Carroll, L.M. Pecora, Phys. Rev. E. 50, 1874 (1994)
J. Jost, M.P. Joy, Phys. Rev. E 65, 016201 (2001)
X.F. Wang, G. Chen, IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I 49, 54 (2002)
G. Rangarajan, M. Ding: Phys. Lett. A 296, 204 (2002)
Y.H. Chen, G. Rangarajan, M. Ding: Phys. Rev. E. 67, 026209 (2003)
C.W. Wu, L.O. Chua, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 42, 430 (1995)
I.V. Belykh, V.N. Belykh, M. Hasler, Physica D 195, 159 (2004)
I.V. Belykh, V.N. Belykh, M. Hasler, Physica D 195, 188 (2004)
J. Cao, P. Li, W. Wang, Phys. Lett. A 353, 318 (2006)
W. Lu, T. Chen, Physica D 213, 214 (2006)
A. Schnitzler, J. Gross, Nat. Rev. Neurosci 6, 285 (2005)
P.R. Chandler, M. Patcher, S. Rasmussen, Proceedings of the American Control Society, 20 (2001)
K.M. Passino, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 22, 52 (2002)
J. Finke, K. Passino, A.G. Sparks, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 14, 789 (2006)
B. Blasius, A. Huppert, L. Stone, Nature (London) 399, 354 (1999)
E. Montbrió, J. Kurths, B. Blasius, Phys. Rev. E 70, 056125 (2004)
N.F. Rulkov, Chaos 6, 262 (1996)
L. Stone, R. Olinky, B. Blasius, A. Huppert, B. Cazelles, Proceedings of the Sixth Experimental Chaos Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 662, (2002), p. 476
E. Jones, B. Browning, M.B. Dias, B. Argall, M. Veloso, A. Stentz, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, 570 (2006)
K.-S, Hwang, S.-W. Tan, C.-C. Chen, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12, 569 (2004)
V.N. Belykh, I.V. Belykh, M. Hasler, Phys. Rev. E 62, 6332 (2000)
V.N. Belykh, I.V. Belykh, E. Mosekilde, Phys. Rev. E 63, 036216 (2001)
Z. Ma, Z. Liu, G. Zhang, Chaos 16, 023103 (2006)
W. Wu, T. Chen, Physica D 238, 355 (2009)
W. Wu, W. Zhou, T. Chen, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. -I, in press (2008)
S. Jalan, R.E. Amritkar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 014101 (2003)
S. Jalan, R.E. Amritkar, C.-K. Hu, Phys. Rev. E 72, 016211 (2005)
S. Jalan, R.E. Amritkar, C.-K. Hu, Phys. Rev. E 72, 016212 (2005)
X. Liu, T. Chen, Physica D 237, 630 (2008)
F. Sorrentino, E. Ott, Phys. Rev. E 76, 056114 (2007)
L. Chen, J. Lu, J. Syst. Sci. Complexity 20, 21 (2008)
I.V. Belykh, V.N. Belykh, M. Hasler, Chaos 13, 165 (2003)
W. Lu, B. Liu, T. Chen, Chaos 20, 013120 (2010)
The sense of transverse stability is diverse according to the ergodic measure by which the MLE is computed. For instance, Milnor stability, essential stability, or Lyapunov stability. These can correspond to the diversity of the senses of cluster synchronization we discuss in this paper. To avoid rigorous mathematics, we do not present the details. For interesting readers, we refer to [44] for the details
A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999)
P. Ashwin, J. Buescu, I. Stewart, Nonlinearity 9, 703 (1996)
P.A. Horn, C.R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985)
Q.-C. Pham, J.-J. Slotine, Neural Netw. 20, 62 (2007)
W. Lohmiller, J.-J. Slotine, Automatica 34, 671 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, W., Liu, B. & Chen, T. Cluster synchronization in networks of distinct groups of maps. Eur. Phys. J. B 77, 257–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2010-00202-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2010-00202-7