Consensus on de Bruijn graphs

The European Physical Journal B volume 63, pages515–520(2008)Cite this article

Abstract

We study the consensus dynamics with or without time-delays on directed and undirected de Bruijn graphs. Our results show that consensus on an undirected de Bruijn graph has a lower converging speed and larger time-delay tolerance in comparison with that on an undirected scale-free network. Although there is not much difference between the eigenvalue ratios of the two undirected networks, we found that their dynamical properties are remarkably different; consequently, it is seemingly more informative to consider the second smallest and the largest eigenvalues separately rather than considering their ratio in the study of synchronization of a coupled oscillators network. Moreover, our study on directed de Bruijn graphs reveals that properly setting directions on edges can improve the converging speed and time-delay tolerance simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    S.H. Strogatz, Nature 410, 268 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    R. Albert, A.-L. Barabasi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    S.N. Dorogovtsev, J.F.F. Mendes, Adv. Phys. 51, 1079(2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003)

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, D.-U. Hwang, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    R. Pastor-Satorras, A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3200 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    R.M. May, A.L. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. E 64, 066112 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    M. Barthélemy, A. Barrat, R. Pastor-Satorras, A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 178701 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    M.E.J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016128 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    G. Yan, Z.-Q. Fu, J. Ren, W.-X. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 75, 016108 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    L.F. Lago-Fernández, R. Huerta, F. Corbacho, J.A. Sigüenza, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2758 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    M. Barahona, L.M. Pecora, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 054101 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    X.F. Wang, G. Chen, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 12, 187 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    M. Timme, F. Wolf, T. Geisel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 258701 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    T. Nishikawa, A.E. Motter, Y.-C. Lai, F.C. Hoppensteadt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 014101 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    J.G. Restrepo, E. Ott, B.R. Hunt, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066215 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    D.-U. Hwang, M. Chavez, A. Amann, S. Boccaletti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 138701 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    A.E. Motter, C.S. Zhou, J. Kurths, Europhys. Lett. 69,334 (2005); A.E. Motter, C.S. Zhou, J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016116 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, C.J. Pérez-Vicente, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 114102 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    B. Tadic, G.J. Rodgers, Adv. Complex Syst. 5, 445 (2002); B. Tadic, S. Thurner, G.J. Rodgers, Phys. Rev. E 69, 036102 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    L. Zhao, Y.-C. Lai, K. Park, N. Ye, Phys. Rev. E 71, 026125 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    G. Yan, T. Zhou, B. Hu, Z.-Q. Fu, B.-H. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 73, 046108 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    B. Danila, Y. Yu, J.A. Marsh, K.E. Bassler, Phys. Rev. E 74, 046106 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    W.-X. Wang, C.-Y. Yin, G. Yan, B.-H. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 74, 016101 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    S. Sreenivasan, R. Cohen, E. López, Z. Toroczkai, H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 75, 036105 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    N.G. de Bruijn, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. A 49, 758(1946)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    I.J. Good, J. London Math. Soc. 21, 167 (1946)

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    N.A. Lynch, Distributed Algorithms (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin, A.S. Morse, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 48, 988 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    R. Olfati-Saber, R.M. Murray, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 49, 1520 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    R. Olfati-Saber, J.A. Fax, R.M. Murray, Proceedings of the IEEE 95, 215 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Y. Kuramoto, Progr. Theoret. Phys. Suppl. 79, 223 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    S.H. Strogatz, Physica D 143, 1 (2000)

    MATH  Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    K.N. Sivarajan, R. Ramaswami, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 2, 70 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    J. Xu, Topological Structure and Analysis of Interconnection Networks (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    M.F. Kaashoek, D.R. Karger, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2735, 98 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    D. Loguinov, J. Casas, X. Wang, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 13, 1107 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    D. Challet, M. Marsili, Phys. Rev. E 62, 1862 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    P.A. Pevzner, H. Tang, M.S. Waterman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9748 (2001)

    MATH  Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    L. Freeman, Sociometry 40, 35 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    M. Barthélemy, Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 163 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    R.A. Horn, C.R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    L. Donetti, P.I. Hurtado, M.A. Muñoz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 188701 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronic Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P.R. China

    G. Yan & Z. -Q. Fu

  2. Centre for Chaos and Complex Networks and Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China

    G. Yan & G. Chen

Authors
  1. G. Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Z. -Q. Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, G., Fu, Z.Q. & Chen, G. Consensus on de Bruijn graphs. Eur. Phys. J. B 63, 515–520 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00258-x

Download citation

PACS

  • 89.75.-k Complex systems
  • 05.45.Xt Synchronization; coupled oscillators