Skip to main content
Log in

How bad is to be slow-reacting?

On the effect of the delay in response to a changing environment on a population’s survival

  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a simple-model population, whose individuals react with a certain delay to temporal variations of their habitat. We investigate the impact of such a delayed-answer on the survival chances of the population, both in a periodically changing environment, and in the case of an abrupt change of it. It is found that for populations with low degree of mutation-induced variability, being “slow-reacting” decreases the extinction risk due to environmental changes. On the contrary, for populations with high mutation amplitude, the delayed reaction reduces the survival chances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Bena, M. Droz, J. Szwabiński, A. Pękalski, Phys. Rev. E 76, 011908 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. C.M. Pease, R. Lande, J.J. Bull, Ecology 70, 1657 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Lande, Am. Nat. 142, 911 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Sznajd-Weron, A. Pękalski, Physica A 269, 527 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Tessone, C. Mirasso, R. Toral, J.D. Gunton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 193101 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Gaimmaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Zawierta, P. Biecek, W. Waga, S. Cebrat, Th. Biosc. 125, 123 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.M. Thompson, J.C. Ollason, Nature 413, 417 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Both, M.E. Visser, Nature 411, 296 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A.D. Anders, E. Post, J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 221 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P.J. Weatherhead, Oecologia 144, 168 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Both, S. Bouwhuis, C.M. Lessells, M.E. Visser, Nature 441, 81 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Hanski, Nature 396, 41 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. One of the first paper on this subject (that counts by now a huge bibliography) is: P.J. Wangersky, W.J. Cunningham, Ecology 38, 136 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Bürger, M. Lynch, Evolution 49, 201 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. For a pedagogical introduction to finite-size effects in the context of different nonequilibrium phase transitions, see R. Toral, C.J. Tessone, Commun. Comput. Phys. 2, 177 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Bena Coppex.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bena Coppex, I., Droz, M., Szwabiński, J. et al. How bad is to be slow-reacting?. Eur. Phys. J. B 65, 341–346 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00157-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00157-2

PACS

Navigation