Abstract.
The “power of choice” has been shown to radically alter the behavior of a number of randomized algorithms. Here we explore the effects of choice on models of random tree growth. In our models each new node has k randomly chosen contacts, where k > 1 is a constant. It then attaches to whichever one of these contacts is most desirable in some sense, such as its distance from the root or its degree. Even when the new node has just two choices, i.e., when k = 2, the resulting tree can be very different from a random graph or tree. For instance, if the new node attaches to the contact which is closest to the root of the tree, the distribution of depths changes from Poisson to a traveling wave solution. If the new node attaches to the contact with the smallest degree, the degree distribution is closer to uniform than in a random graph, so that with high probability there are no nodes in the tree with degree greater than O(log log N). Finally, if the new node attaches to the contact with the largest degree, we find that the degree distribution is a power law with exponent -1 up to degrees roughly equal to k, with an exponential cutoff beyond that; thus, in this case, we need k ≫ 1 to see a power law over a wide range of degrees.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y. Azar, A.Z. Broder, A.R. Karlin, E. Upfal, Balanced allocations, in Proc. 26th ACM Symp. Theory of Computing (1994) pp. 593–602
Y. Azar, A.Z. Broder, A.R. Karlin, E. Upfal, SIAM J. Comp. 29, 180 (1999)
M. Adler, S. Chakarabarti, M. Mitzenmacher, L. Rasmussen, Rand. Struct. Alg. 13, 159 (1998)
M. Mitzenmacher, E. Upfal, Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005)
R.T. Smythe, H. Mahmoud, Theory Probab. Math. Statist. 51, 1 (1995)
M. Drmota, B. Gittenberger, Random Struct. Alg. 10, 421 (1997); M. Drmota, H.-K. Hwang, Adv. Appl. Probab. 37, 321 (2005)
P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 258703 (2002); e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0207370
S. Janson, Alea Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 1, 347 (2006); e-print arXiv:math/0509471
We always assume that the initial tree is a single node which is the root
A.L. Barabási, R. Albert, Science 286, 509–512 (1999)
P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066123 (2001); e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0011094
Equation \(Q_j(N+1)=Q_j(N)+\frac{1}{N}\,Q_{j-1}(N)\) appears in many contexts, e.g. for networks with copying: P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036118 (2005); e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0410379
R.L. Graham, D.E. Knuth, O. Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1989)
E. Ben-Naim, P.L. Krapivsky, S.N. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. E 64, 035101 (2001); e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0105
W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rep. 386, 29 (2003)
S.N. Majumdar, P.L. Krapivsky, Physica A 318, 161 (2003); e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0205581
R. van Zon, H. van Beijeren, Ch. Dellago, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2035 (1998)
P.L. Krapivsky, S.N. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5492 (2000)
M. Mitzenmacher, IEEE Trans. Paral. Dist. Sys. 12, 1094 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D'Souza, R., Krapivsky, P. & Moore, C. The power of choice in growing trees . Eur. Phys. J. B 59, 535–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2007-00310-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2007-00310-5