Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract.

We generalize the Poissonian evolving random graph model of M. Bauer and D. Bernard (2003), to deal with arbitrary degree distributions. The motivation comes from biological networks, which are well-known to exhibit non Poissonian degree distributions. A node is added at each time step and is connected to the rest of the graph by oriented edges emerging from older nodes. This leads to a statistical asymmetry between incoming and outgoing edges. The law for the number of new edges at each time step is fixed but arbitrary. Thermodynamical behavior is expected when this law has a large time limit. Although (by construction) the incoming degree distributions depend on this law, this is not the case for most qualitative features concerning the size distribution of connected components, as long as the law has a finite variance. As the variance grows above 1/4, the average being < 1/2, a giant component emerges, which connects a finite fraction of the vertices. Below this threshold, the distribution of component sizes decreases algebraically with a continuously varying exponent. The transition is of infinite order, in sharp contrast with the case of static graphs. The local-in-time profiles for the components of finite size allow to give a refined description of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Albert, A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bauer, D. Bernard, J. Stat. Phys. 111(3), 703 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bauer, D. Bernard, Maximal entropy random networks with given degree distribution, ArXiv:cond-mat/0206150

  4. D.S. Callaway, J.E. Hopcroft, J.M. Kleinberg, M.E.J. Newman, H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. E 64, 041902 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S.N. Dorogovtsev, J.F.F. Mendes, Adv. Phys. 51, 1079 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.N. Dorogovtsev, J.F.F. Mendes, A.N. Samukhin, Phys. Rev. E 64, 066110 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Erdös, A. Rényi, Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci. 5, 17 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Guelzim, S. Bottani, P. Bourgine, F. Képés, Nature Genetics, in press

  9. J. Kim, P.L. Krapivsky, B. Kahng, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 66, 055101 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee , Science 298, 799 (2002), see also http://web.wi.mit.edu/young/regulator\_network

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Molloy, B. Reed, Random Struct. Algorithms 6, 161 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M.E. Newman, S.H. Strogatz, D. Watts, Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Whittle, J. Stat. Phys. 56, 499 (1989)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Coulomb.

Additional information

Received: 20 December 2003, Published online: 15 October 2003

PACS:

02.10.Ox Combinatorics; graph theory - 02.50.-r Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics - 64.60.Ak Renormalization-group, fractal, and percolation studies of phase transitions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coulomb, S., Bauer, M. Asymmetric evolving random networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 35, 377–389 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2003-00290-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2003-00290-4

Keywords

Navigation