Skip to main content
Log in

Development of machine learning analyses with graph neural network for the WASA-FRS experiment

  • Special Article - New Tools and Techniques
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The WASA-FRS experiment aims to reveal the nature of light \(\Lambda \) hypernuclei with heavy-ion beams. The lifetimes of hypernuclei are measured precisely from their decay lengths and kinematics. To reconstruct a \(\pi ^{-}\) track emitted from hypernuclear decay, track finding is an important issue. In this study, a machine learning analysis method with a graph neural network (GNN), which is a powerful tool for deducing the connection between data nodes, was developed to obtain track associations from numerous combinations of hit information provided in detectors based on a Monte Carlo simulation. An efficiency of 98% was achieved for tracking \(\pi ^{-}\) mesons using the developed GNN model. The GNN model can also estimate the charge and momentum of the particles of interest. More than 99.9% of the negative charged particles were correctly identified with a momentum accuracy of 6.3%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This is a simulation study and thus there are no experimental data associated.]

References

  1. G. Bohm et al., A determination of the binding-energy values of light hypernuclei. Nucl. Phys. B 4(6), 511–526 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Juric et al., A new determination of the binding-energy values of the light hypernuclei (\(15\le \rm A \)). Nucl. Phys. B 52, 1–30 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P.A. Zyla et al. Review of Particle Physics. PTEP, 2020(8):083C01, 2020

  4. C. Rappold et al., Hypernuclear spectroscopy of products from \(^{6}{{\rm Li}}\) projectiles on a carbon target at \(2\, A\,{{\rm GeV}}\). Nucl. Phys. A 913, 170–184 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Rappold et al., Search for evidence of \(_{\Lambda }^{3}n\) by observing \(d+\pi ^{-}\) and \(t+\pi ^{-}\) final states in the reaction of \(^{6}{{\rm Li}}+^{12}{{\rm C}}\) at \(2\, A\,{{\rm GeV}} \). Phys. Rev. C 88(4), 041001 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Rappold et al., Hypernuclear production cross section in the reaction of \(^{6}{{\rm Li}}\) + \(^{12}{{\rm C}}\) at \(2\, A\,{{\rm GeV}}\). Phys. Lett. B 747, 129–134 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T.R. Saito et al., Summary of the HypHI Phase 0 experiment and future plans with FRS at GSI (FAIR Phase 0). Nucl. Phys. A 954, 199–212 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Adamczyk et al., Measurement of the \(_{\Lambda }^{3}{{\rm H}}\) lifetime in Au+Au collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. C 97, 054909 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Adam et al., \({}_{\Lambda }^{3}{{\rm H}}\) and \({}_{\bar{\Lambda }}^{3}{\bar{H}}\) production in Pb-Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 2.76\,{{\rm TeV}}\). Phys. Lett. B 754, 360–372 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M.S. Abdallah et al., Measurements of \(_{\Lambda }^{3}{{\rm H}}\) and \(_{\Lambda }^{4}{{\rm H}}\) Lifetimes and Yields in \({{\rm Au}}+{{\rm Au}}\) Collisions in the High Baryon Density Region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 202301 (2022)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Acharya et al., \({}_{\Lambda }^{3}{{\rm H}}\) and \({}_{\bar{\Lambda }}^{3}{\bar{H}}\) lifetime measurement in Pb-Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02\,{{\rm TeV}}\) via two-body decay. Phys. Lett. B 797, 134905 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Adam et al., Measurement of the mass difference and the binding energy of the hypertriton and antihypertriton. Nat. Phys. 16, 409–412 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T.R. Saito et al., New directions in hypernuclear physics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 803–813 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Geissel et al., The GSI projectile fragment separator (FRS): a versatile magnetic system for relativistic heavy ions. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 70(1), 286–297 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Bargholtz et al., The WASA detector facility at CELSIUS. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 594(3), 339–350 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jie Zhou et al., Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. AI Open 1, 57–81 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Agostinelli et al., Geant4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250–303 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Sekiya et al., Time resolution and high-counting rate performance of plastic scintillation counter with multiple MPPC readout. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1034, 166745 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Bleicher et al., Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 25, 1859–1896 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takehiko Saito, Hiroyuki Ekawa, Manami Nakagawa, Novel method for producing very-neutron-rich hypernuclei via charge-exchange reactions with heavy ion projectiles. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 159 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tadeas Bilka et al. Implementation of GENFIT2 as an experiment independent track-fitting framework. (2019)

  22. Adam Paszke et al. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32, (2019)

  23. Matthias Fey , Jan E. Lenssen. Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric. In ICLR Workshop on Representation Learning on Graphs and Manifolds, (2019)

  24. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, Jian Sun. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 1026–1034, (2015)

  25. Justin Gilmer, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Patrick F. Riley, Oriol Vinyals, and George E. Dahl. Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70, pages 1263–1272, (2017)

  26. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville. Deep Learning. MIT Press, (2016). http://www.deeplearningbook.org

  27. Juntang Zhuang et al. Adabelief optimizer: Adapting stepsizes by the belief in observed gradients. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020

  28. Takuya Akiba, Shotaro Sano, Toshihiko Yanase, Takeru Ohta, Masanori Koyama. Optuna: A Next-Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD ’19, page 2623-2631, 2019

  29. François Drielsma et al., Clustering of electromagnetic showers and particle interactions with graph neural networks in liquid argon time projection chambers. Phys. Rev. D 104, 072004 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bernard A. Galler, Michael J. Fisher, An Improved Equivalence Algorithm. Commun. ACM 7(5), 301–303 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Special Postdoctoral Researcher Program at RIKEN. The authors thank Yukiko Kurakata of the High Energy Nuclear Physics Laboratory at RIKEN to provide administrative support for the entire project. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Ekawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Communicated by Takashi Nakamura.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekawa, H., Dou, W., Gao, Y. et al. Development of machine learning analyses with graph neural network for the WASA-FRS experiment. Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 103 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01016-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01016-5

Navigation