Abstract
Using the multiphase transport (AMPT) model, we study the relative neutron density fluctuation and neutron–proton correlation in matter produced by Au + Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}= \)7.7–200 GeV. The rapidity, centrality, and energy dependence of these two observations are also discussed. The light nuclei yield ratio of proton, deuteron, and triton \(N_tN_p/N_d^2\) calculated directly from the relative neutron density fluctuation and neutron–proton correlation, decreases with rapidity coverage and increases with collision centrality. Our study also found that the ratio does not exhibit any non-monotonic behavior in collision energy dependence. Since there is no first-order phase transition or critical physics in the AMPT model, our work provides a reference for extracting the relative neutron density fluctuation from light nuclei production in experiments.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-022-00897-2/MediaObjects/10050_2022_897_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-022-00897-2/MediaObjects/10050_2022_897_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-022-00897-2/MediaObjects/10050_2022_897_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-022-00897-2/MediaObjects/10050_2022_897_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-022-00897-2/MediaObjects/10050_2022_897_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The manuscript has associated data in a data repository [Authors’ comment: All data included in this manuscript are available upon request by contacting with the corresponding author.]
References
P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Wambach, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1031 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1031
Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S.. D. Katz, K..K. Szabo, Nature 443, 675 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05120
P. de Forcrand, O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B 642, 290 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00626-0
Z. Fodor, S..D. Katz, K..K. Szabó, Phys. Lett. B 568, 73 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.06.011
Z. Fodor, S..D. Katz, J. High Energy Phys. 2004, 050 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/050
R.V. Gavai, S. Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 71(2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.114014
F. Karsch et al., Nucl. Phys. A 956, 352 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.01.008
S. Gupta, X. Luo, B. Mohanty, H..G. Ritter, N. Xu, Science 332, 1525 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204621
M. Stephanov, PoS LAT2006, 024 (2006). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.032.0024
M..M. Aggarwal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022302 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022302
L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 032302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.032302
L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 092301 (2014b). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.092301
L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Lett. B 785, 551 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.066
J. Adam et al., Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014902
J. Adam et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 092301 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.092301
K..-J. Sun, L..-W. Chen, C..M. Ko, Z. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 774, 103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.056
K..-J. Sun, L..-W. Chen, C..M. Ko, J. Pu, Z. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 781, 499 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.035
N. Yu, D. Zhang, X. Luo, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/44/1/014002
W. Zhao, K.-j Sun, C.M. Ko, X. Luo, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136571
H. Liu, D. Zhang, S. He, K.-J. Sun, N. Yu, X. Luo, Phys. Lett. B 805(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135452
D. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. A 1005 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121825
T. S. Collaboration, href@noop (2022). arXiv:2209.08058
Z.-W. Lin, C.M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064901
Z..-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014904
Z.-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014904
K.-J. Sun, C.M. Ko, Z.-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. C 103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.064909
T. Anticic et al., Phys. Rev. C 94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044906 (NA49 Collaboration)
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the referee for his/her careful reading of the paper and valuable comments. This work is supported in part by the Science and technology research project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education (No. B2021256), Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (No. 212300410386), Key Research Projects of Henan Higher Education Institutions (No. 20A140024), and NSFC Key Grant 12061141008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Che-Ming Ko.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Yu, N. & Xu, H. Neutron density fluctuation and neutron–proton correlation from AMPT model. Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00897-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00897-2