Abstract.
A good knowledge of the radiative capture cross section of 242Pu is required for innovative nuclear reactor studies, especially for MoX fuel reactors. However, the experimental data available show discrepancies in the energy regions of interest: the thermal point and the keV region. Previous experimental results of the thermal cross section deviate from each other by 20% and these discrepancies are reflected also in the evaluated libraries, each of them giving more credit to different data sets. A recent measurement by Genreith et al. did not succeed to solve the existing discrepancy due to the large uncertainties and correction factors in the analysis. This work presents a new measurement of the thermal capture cross section of 242Pu carried out in the Budapest Research Reactor using the same thin targets of a previous measurement at n_TOF-EAR1, each containing 30mg of 99.995% pure 242Pu . The combined analysis of the full prompt \( \gamma\)-ray spectrum and the 243Pu decay has led to three compatible values for the thermal cross section. Their average value, 18.9(9)b, has an improved accuracy compared to recent measurements. Leaving aside the activation value of Genreith using an outdated intensity value for the 84 keV decay line of 243Pu , our average result is in very good agreement with the JEFF-3.2 evaluation and all the previous measurements, with the exception of the highest value 22.5(11)b reported by Marie et al., which has a strong influence in the ENDF evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Atomic Energy Agency, Status and advances in Mox fuel technology, IAEA Technical Reports Series 415 (2003)
N. Colonna et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1910 (2010)
M. Salvatores, R. Jacqmin, Uncertainty and Target Accuracy Assessment for Innovative System Using Recent Covariance Data Evaluations (NEA/WPEC-26, 2008)
NEA Nuclear Data High Priority Request List, http://www.oecd-nea.org/dbdata/hprl/
C. Guerrero et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 27 (2013)
J. Lerendegui-Marco, C. Guerrero et al., Phys. Rev. C 97, 024605 (2018)
J. Lerendegui-Marco, C. Guerrero, in preparation
V. Semkova, N. Otuka, M. Mikhailiukova, B. Pritychenko, O. Cabellos, EPJ Web of Conferences 146, 07003 (2017)
F. Marie et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 556, 547 (2006)
J.P. Butler et al., Can. J. Phys. 35, 147 (1957)
R.W. Durham, F. Molson, Can. J. Phys. 48, 716 (1970)
P.J. Bendt, E.T. Jurney, Los Alamos Scientific Lab. Reports, 7853 (1979)
Genreith et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 296, 699 (2013)
M. Rossbach et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 304, 1359 (2015)
R.F. Casten, W.R. Kane, J.R. Erskine, A.M. Friedman, D.S. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 14, 912 (1976)
Y. Akovali et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 103, 515 (2004)
Zs. Révay, T. Belgya, Zs. Kasztovszky, J.L. Weil, G.L. Molnr, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 213, 385 (2004)
L. Szentmiklósi et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 286, 501 (2010)
T. Belgya, Phys. Proc. 31, 99 (2012)
J. Füzi, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 586, 41 (2008)
CHANDA: solving CHAllenges in Nuclear DAta, Project funded by FP7-EURATOM-FISSION, EC (Grant No. 605203)
C. Guerrero, J. Lerendegui-Marco, K. Eberhardt et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 925, 87 (2019)
L. Szentmiklósi, T. Belgya, M. Boglarka, Z. Kis, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 300, 553 (2014)
Z. Kis, P. Völgyesi, Z. Szabó, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 298, 2029 (2013)
P.R. Fields et al., Nucl. Phys. A 103, 460 (1971)
P. Leconte, in International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, (EDP Sciences, 2007) pp. 521--524
The JEFF-3.1.1 Nuclear Data Library, JEFF Report 22, OECD/NEA Data Bank (2009)
M.B. Chadwick et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887 (2011)
J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006)
J. Allison et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 835, 186 (2016)
National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File
Database of prompt gamma rays from slow neutron capture for elemental analysis, (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2006)
C.D. Nesaraja, E.A. McCutchan, Nucl. Data Sheets 121, 695 (2014)
M. Guttormsen, T.S. Tveter, L. Bergholt, F. lngebretsen, J. Rekstad, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 374, 37 (1996)
T. Belgya, in Proceedings of the European Research Infrastructures for Nuclear Data Applications (ERINDA) workshop, CERN, Geneva, CERN-Proceedings-2014-002 (CERN, 2014) pp. 119--126
T. Belgya et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 276, 609 (2008)
T. Kibédi, T.W. Burrows, M.B. Trzhaskovskaya, P.M. Davidson, C.W. Nestor, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 589, 202 (2008)
T. Laplace et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 014323 (2016)
K. Shibata et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Obertelli
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: All data generated during this study are contained in this published article.]
Publisher’s Note
The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lerendegui-Marco, J., Guerrero, C., Belgya, T. et al. Improved 242Pu(n,\( \gamma\)) thermal cross section combining activation and prompt gamma analysis. Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12730-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12730-6