The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 227, Issue 14, pp 1639–1655 | Cite as

Modeling the current modulation of dsDNA in nanopores – from mean-field to atomistic and back

  • Florian WeikEmail author
  • Kai Szuttor
  • Jonas Landsgesell
  • Christian HolmEmail author
Regular Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Particle Methods in Natural Science and Engineering


All-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) translocating through a cylindrical nanopore by Kesselheim et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 018101 (2014)] have revealed that ions close to the surface of the DNA experience an additional friction contribution when compared to their bulk value. This friction is a key ingredient in reproducing the 2006 experimentally observed current modifications by Smeets and coworkers. While these findings were already incorporated into a coarse-grained model by Weik et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 145, 194106 (2016)], we now present an extended mean-field model for solving the electrokinetic equations of a dsDNA confined to a structureless cylindrical pore. This is done by incorporating a suitably constructed friction term into the Nernst-Planck equation. Solving the modified electrokinetic equations using a finite element method, we demonstrate that this model is able to reproduce experimental and atomistic MD results for dsDNA current modulations. The advantage of our model is that it allows a fast evaluation of new geometric arrangements of the DNA within the cylinder.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W.H. Coulter, Means for counting particles suspended in a fluid (1949)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Dekker, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 209 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Howorka, Z. Siwy, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 2360 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Venkatesan, R. Bashir, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 615 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V.V. Palyulin, T. Ala-Nissila, R. Metzler, Soft Matter 10, 9016 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Fyta, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 273101 (2015)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Howorka, S. Cheley, H. Bayley, Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 636 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Clarke, H.-C. Wu, L. Jayasinghe, A. Patel, S. Reid, H. Bayley, Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 265 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Miles, A. Ivanov, K. Wilson, F. Dogan, D. Japrung, J. Edel, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Traversi, C. Raillon, S.M. Benameur, K. Liu, S. Khlybov, M. Tosun, D. Krasnozhon, A. Kis, A. Radenovic, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 939 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Kalman, K. Healy, Z. Siwy, Europhys. Lett. 78, 28002 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.J. Steinbock, A. Lucas, O. Otto, U.F. Keyser, Electrophoresis 33, 3480 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.J. Steinbock, U.F. Keyser, Analyzing single dna molecules by nanopore translocation, in Nanopore-based technology, , edited by M.E. Gracheva (Springer, New York, 2012), Chap. 7, p. 135Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.F. Schneider, C. Dekker, Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 326 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Kesselheim, C. Holm, in Electrostatics of soft and disordered media, , edited by R.D. Dean, J. Dobnikar, A. Naji, R. Podgornik (Pan Stanford Publishing, USA, 2014), p. 315Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.M.M. Smeets, U.F. Keyser, D. Krapf, M.-Y. Wu, N.H. Dekker, C. Dekker, Nano Lett. 6, 89 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. van Dorp, U.F. Keyser, N.H. Dekker, C. Dekker, S.G. Lemay, Nat. Phys. 5, 347 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    U. Keyser, J. van der Does, C. Dekker, N. Dekker, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 105105 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    U. Keyser, B. Koeleman, S. van Dorp, D. Krapf, R. Smeets, S. Lemay, N. Dekker, C. Dekker, Nat. Phys. 2, 473 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    U.F. Keyser, S. van Dorp, S.G. Lemay, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 939 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Kesselheim, W. Müller, C. Holm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 018101 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Duan, C. Wu, S. Chowdhury, M.C. Lee, G. Xiong, W. Zhang, R. Yang, P. Cieplak, R. Luo, T. Lee, J. Caldwell, J. Wang, P. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1999 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H.J.C. Berendsen, J.R. Grigera, T.P. Straatsma, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D.E. Smith, L.X. Dang, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3757 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L.X. Dang, P.A. Kollman, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 55 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L.X. Dang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 6954 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Noy, I. Soteras, F.J. Luque, M. Orozco, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 10596 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. Onsager, Chem. Rev. 13, 73 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. Netz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 138101 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Blake, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 70, 303 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    F. Weik, S. Kesselheim, C. Holm, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 194106 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Rau, F. Weik, C. Holm, Soft Matter 13, 3918 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    P. Rothemund, Nature 440, 297 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    N.A.W. Bell, C.R. Engst, M. Ablay, G. Divitini, C. Ducati, T. Liedl, U.F. Keyser, Nano Lett. 12, 512 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. Hernandez-Ainsa, N.A. Bell, V.V. Thacker, K. Gooepfrich, K. Misiunas, M.E. Fuentes-Perez, F. Moreno-Herrero, U.F. Keyser, ACS Nano 7, 6024 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    B.J. Kirby, Micro- and nanoscale fluid mechanics: Transport in microfluidic devices (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    G. Rempfer, G.B. Davies, C. Holm, J. de Graaf, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 044901 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A.L. Horvath, Handbook of aqueous electrolyte solutions, 1st edn (Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester, 1985), p. 249Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Allison, C. Chen, D. Stigter, Biophys. J. 81, 2558 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    G. Rempfer, S. Ehrhardt, N. Laohakunakorn, G.B. Davies, U.F. Keyser, C. Holm, J. de Graaf, Langmuir 32, 8525 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    G. Rempfer, S. Ehrhardt, C. Holm, J. de Graaf, Macromol. Theory Simul. 26, 1600051 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Computational Physics, University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations