Advertisement

The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 225, Issue 17–18, pp 3313–3335 | Cite as

Monetary economics from econophysics perspective

  • Victor M. Yakovenko
Regular Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Discussion and Debate: Can Economics be a Physical Science?

Abstract

This is an invited article for the Discussion and Debate special issue of The European Physical Journal Special Topics on the subject “Can Economics be a Physical Science?” The first part of the paper traces the personal path of the author from theoretical physics to economics. It briefly summarizes applications of statistical physics to monetary transactions in an ensemble of economic agents. It shows how a highly unequal probability distribution of money emerges due to irreversible increase of entropy in the system. The second part examines deep conceptual and controversial issues and fallacies in monetary economics from econophysics perspective. These issues include the nature of money, conservation (or not) of money, distinctions between money vs. wealth and money vs. debt, creation of money by the state and debt by the banks, the origins of monetary crises and capitalist profit. Presentation uses plain language understandable to laypeople and may be of interest to both specialists and general public.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.A. Drăgulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Eur. Phys. J. B 17, 723 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.M. Lifshitz, L.P. Pitaevskii, Physical Kinetics (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1981)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Ispolatov, P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Eur. Phys. J. B 2, 267 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Chakraborti, B.K. Chakrabarti, Eur. Phys. J. B 17, 167 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Angle, Social Forces 65, 293 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V.M. Yakovenko, J.B. Rosser Jr., Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1703 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B.K. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti, S.R. Chakravarty, A. Chatterjee, Econophysics of Income and Wealth Distributions (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.E. Stanley et al., Physica A 224, 302 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.K. Chakrabarti, Econophys-Kolkata: a short story, in Econophysics of Wealth Distributions, edited by A. Chatterjee, S. Yarlagadda, B.K. Chakrabarti (Springer, Milan, 2005), pp. 225–228Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.A. Drăgulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 585 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.A. Drăgulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Physica A 299, 213 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.A. Drăgulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Statistical mechanics of money, income, and wealth: a short survey, in Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures, edited by P.L. Garrido, J. Marro (American Institute of Physics [AIP] Conference Proceedings 661, New York, 2003), pp. 180–183Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.C. Silva, V.M. Yakovenko, Europhys. Lett. 69, 304 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Banerjee, V.M. Yakovenko, New J. Phys. 12, 075032 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Harvard University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Cho, Science 344, 828 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V.M. Yakovenko, Applications of statistical mechanics to economics: Entropic origin of the probability distributions of money, income, and energy consumption, in Social Fairness and Economics: Economic essays in the spirit of Duncan Foley, edited by L. Taylor, A. Rezai, T. Michl (Routledge, 2013), pp. 53–82Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Lawrence, Q. Liu, V.M. Yakovenko, Global inequality in energy consumption from 1980 to 2010, Entropy 15, 5565 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    U. Bott, The coming global economic ice age?, The Globalist, 12 August 2013, http://www.theglobalist.com/the-coming-global-economic-ice-age/
  22. 22.
    L. Summers, Secular Stagnation, http://larrysummers.com/secular-stagnation/
  23. 23.
    C.R. McConnell, S.L. Brue, Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies, 13th edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Local Exchange Trading System (LETS), Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_exchange_trading_system
  25. 25.
    Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Monetary_Theory
  26. 26.
    Mainstream economics and Modern Monetary Theory: A family tree, The Washington Post, February 17, 2012, https://www.washingtonpost.com/mainstream-economics-and-modern-monetary-theory-a-family-tree/2012/02/17/gIQAiy6RKR_graphic.html
  27. 27.
    R. Wray, Modern Money Theory (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Chen, V.M. Yakovenko, Computer Animation of Money Exchange Models, http://physics.umd.edu/~yakovenk/econophysics/animation.html
  29. 29.
    New Economic Policy in Soviet history, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Economic_Policy
  30. 30.
    V.M. Yakovenko, in KITP colloquium, May 13, 2009, http://online.itp.ucsb.edu/online/colloq/yakovenko2/
  31. 31.
    H.S. Dent, The Great Boom Ahead (Hyperion, New York, 1993)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Duncan, QE Is Debt Cancellation, The Globalist, August 28, 2015, http://www.theglobalist.com/qe-debt-cancellation-world-economy/
  33. 33.
    J. Colombo, Why The Worst Is Still Ahead For Turkey's Bubble Economy, Forbes, March 5, 2014, http://www.forbes.com/sites/jessecolombo/2014/03/05/why-the-worst-is-still-ahead-for-turkeys-bubble-economy/#254a07297195
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    S. Keen, J. Post Keynesian Econ. 17, 607 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reserve requirement, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_requirement
  37. 37.
    Y.Q. Mui, Now we know what the Federal Reserve did to inequality, The Washington Post, June 1, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/01/now-we-know-what-the-federal-reserve-did-to-inequality/
  38. 38.
    G. Ip, Foolproof: Why Safety Can Be Dangerous and How Danger Makes Us Safe (Hachette, 2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    G. Tverberg, A new theory of energy and the economy, Part 3: The problem of debt as we reach oil limits, The Energy Collective, February 13, 2015, http://www.theenergycollective.com/gail-tverberg/2193466/problem-debt-we-reach-oil-limits
  40. 40.
    I.V. Kuntsevich, Economical Equilibrium: Geometry of Economics (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013), http://www.economicalequilibrium.com

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCMTC and JQI, University of MarylandMarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations