The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 225, Issue 8–9, pp 1805–1815 | Cite as

Directing the phase behavior of polyelectrolyte complexes using chiral patterned peptides

  • Naomi M. Pacalin
  • Lorraine Leon
  • Matthew TirrellEmail author
Regular Article Specific Models to Tackle Fundamental Questions
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Modern Simulation Approaches in Soft Matter Science: From Fundamental Understanding to Industrial Applications


Polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) have a broad range of promising applications as soft materials due to their self-assembly and diversity of structure and chemical composition. Peptide polymer PECs are highly biocompatible and biodegradable, making them particularly useful for encapsulation of food additives and flavors, micellar drug delivery, medical and underwater adhesives, fetal membrane patches, and scaffolds for cell growth in tissue engineering. While parameters affecting PEC formation and stability in regards to charge effects are well researched, little is known about the effects of van der Waals interactions, hydrogen bonding, and secondary structure in these materials. Peptide chirality provides a unique opportunity to manipulate PEC phase to modulate the amount of solid-like (precipitate) or liquid-like (coacervate) character by influencing hydrogen bonding interactions among peptide chains. In previous work, we showed that chiral peptides form solid complexes, while complexes with even one racemic peptide were fluid. This raised the interesting question of how long a homochiral sequence must be to result in solid phase formation. In this work, we designed chiral patterned peptides of polyglutamic acid and polylysine ranging from 50 to 90% L-chiral residues with increasing numbers of sequential L-chiral residues before a chirality change. These polymers were mixed together to form PECs. We observed that 8 or more sequential L-chiral residues are necessary to achieve both the appearance of a precipitate phase and sustained β-sheets in the complex, as determined by optical imaging and FTIR Spectroscopy. Less homochiral content results in formation of a coacervate phase. Thus, we show that chiral sequence can be used to control the phase transition of PECs. Understanding how to manipulate PEC phase using chiral sequence as presented here may enable tuning of the material properties to achieve the desired mechanical strength for coatings and polymer brushes, or the most effective molecular release kinetics for drug delivery applications, for example.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.V.D. Gucht, E. Spruijt, M. Lemmers, M.A. Cohen Stuart, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 361, 407 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.L. Perry, L. Leon, K.Q. Hoffmann, M.J. Kade, D. Priftis, K.A. Black, D. Wong, R.A. Klein, C.F. Pierce III, K.O. Margossian, J.K. Whitmer, J. Qin, J.J. de Pablo, M. Tirrell, Nat. Commun. 6, 6052 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Priftis, N. Laugel, M. Tirrell, Langmuir 28, 15947 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Priftis, M. Tirrell, Soft Matter 8, 9396 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.G. de Kruif, F. Weinbreck, R. de Vries, Curr. Opin. Colloid & Interface Sci. 9, 340 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Fändrich, C.M. Dobson, EMBO J 21, 5682 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Dzwolak, R. Ravindra, C. Nicolini, R. Jansen, R. Winter, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3762 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.-H. Fuhrhop, M. Krull, G. Büldt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 26, 699 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.A. Augustin, Y. Hemar, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 902 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Madene, M. Jacquot, J. Scher, S. Desobry, Inter. J. Food Sci. Technol. 41, 1 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Azzaroni, J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 50, 3225 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.J. Stewart, C.S. Wang, H. Shao, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 167, 85 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.S. Hwang, H. Zeng, A. Srivastava, D.V. Krogstad, M. Tirrell, J.N. Israelachvili, J.H. Waite, Soft Matter 6, 3232 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L.K. Mann, R. Papanna, K.J. Moise Jr., R.H. Byrd, E.J. Popek, S. Kaur, S.C.G. Tseng, R.J. Stewart, Acta Biomaterialia 8, 2160 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.J. Ono, A.L.Z. Lee, W. Chin, W.S. Goh, A.Y.L. Lee, Y.Y. Yang, J.L. Hedrick, ACS Macro Lett. 4, 886 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.H. Ortony, S.-H. Choi, J.M. Spruell, J.N. Hunt, N.A. Lynd, D.V. Krogstad, V.S. Urban, C.J. Hawker, E.J. Kramer, S. Han, Chem. Sci. 5, 58 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K.A. Black, D. Priftis, S.L. Perry, J. Yip, W.Y. Byun, M. Tirrell, ACS Macro Lett. 3, 1088 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.J. Chung, M. Tirrell, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 4, 2408 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Lankalapalli, V.R.M. Kolapalli, Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 71, 481 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.H. Kim, T. Ramasamy, T.H. Tran, J.Y. Choi, H.J. Cho, C.S. Yong, J.O. Kim, Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 9, 191 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Trivedi, U.B. Kompella, Nanomedicine (Lond) 5, 485 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    I.-C. Liao, A.C.A. Wan, E.K.F. Yim, K.W. Leong, J. Control Release 104, 347 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C.-H. Kuo, L. Leon, E.J. Chung, R.-T. Huang, T.J. Sontag, C.A. Reardon, G.S. Getz, M. Tirrell, Y. Fang, J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 8142 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E.K.F. Yim, I.-C. Liao, K.W. Leong, Tissue Eng. 13, 423 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Q. Wang, J. B. Schlenoff, Macromolecules 47, 3108 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Tapia, Z. Escobar, E. Costa, J. Sapag-Hagar, F. Valenzuela, C. Basualto, M.N. Gai, M. Yazdani-Pedram, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 57, 65 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y.P. Myer, Macromolecules 2, 624 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Priftis, X. Xia, K.O. Margossian, S.L. Perry, L. Leon, J. Qin, J.J. de Pablo, M. Tirrell, Macromolecules 47, 3076 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Baiz, M. Reppert, A. Tokmakoffm, Ultrafast Infrared Vibrational Spectroscopy (CRC Press, 2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    K.Q. Hoffmann, S.L. Perry, L. Leon, D. Priftis, M. Tirrell, J.J. de Pablo, Soft Matter 11, 1525 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G.B. Fields, R.L. Noble, Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 35, 161 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    N.J. Greenfield, G.D. Fasman, Biochemistry 8, 4108 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.T. Vivian, P.R. Callis, Biophys. J. 80, 2093 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    L. Richert, Y. Arntz, P. Schaaf, J.-C. Voegel, C. Picart, Surf. Sci. 570, 13 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Doi, S.F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Clarendon Press, 1988)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    B.P. Chan, K.W. Leong, Eur. Spine J. 17, 467 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naomi M. Pacalin
    • 1
  • Lorraine Leon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Matthew Tirrell
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute for Molecular Engineering, University of ChicagoChicago, IllinoisUSA
  2. 2.Argonne National Laboratory, ArgonneIllinoisUSA

Personalised recommendations