Abstract
Renewables will soon dominate energy production in our electric power system. And yet, how to integrate renewable energy into the grid and the market is still a subject of major debate. Decentral Smart Grid Control (DSGC) was recently proposed as a robust and decentralized approach to balance supply and demand and to guarantee a grid operation that is both economically and dynamically feasible. Here, we analyze the impact of network topology by assessing the stability of essential network motifs using both linear stability analysis and basin volume for delay systems. Our results indicate that if frequency measurements are averaged over sufficiently large time intervals, DSGC enhances the stability of extended power grid systems. We further investigate whether DSGC supports centralized and/or decentralized power production and find it to be applicable to both. However, our results on cycle-like systems suggest that DSGC favors systems with decentralized production. Here, lower line capacities and lower averaging times are required compared to those with centralized production.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
- 1.
O. Edenhofer, R. Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth (2011)
- 2.
B. für Wirtschaft und Energie, Erneuerbare Energien im Jahr 2014 (2015), http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/
- 3.
T. Ackermann, G. Andersson, L. Söder, Electric Power Systems Research 57, 195 (2001)
- 4.
P. Kotler, Adv. Consumer Res. 13, 510 (1986)
- 5.
J.A. Turner, Science 285, 687 (1999)
- 6.
50 Hertz, Amprion, T. TSO, TransnetBW, Netzentwicklungplan Strom (2012), http://www.netzentwicklungsplan.de
- 7.
G. Boyle, Renewable Energy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)
- 8.
D. Heide, L.V. Bremen, M. Greiner, C. Hoffmann, M. Speckmann, S. Bofinger, Renewable Energy 35, 2483 (2010)
- 9.
P. Milan, M. Wächter, J. Peinke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 138701 (2013)
- 10.
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi), Ein Strommarkt für die Energiewende (2014)
- 11.
M. Jansen, C. Richts, N. Gerhardt, Strommarkt-Flexibilisierung – Hemmnisse und Lösungskonzepte (2015)
- 12.
D. Butler, Nature 445, 586 (2007)
- 13.
M.H. Albadi, E.F. El-Saadany, Electr. Power Syst. Res. 78, 1989 (2008)
- 14.
P. Palensky, D. Dietrich, Ind. Informatics, IEEE Transactions on 7, 381 (2011)
- 15.
J.K. Kok, C.J. Warmer, I. Kamphuis, Proc. Fourth Int. joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Syst. (ACM, 2005), p. 75
- 16.
L. Hofmann, M. Sonnenschein, Smart Nord Final Rep. (2015), http://smartnord.de/downloads/SmartNordFinalReport.pdf
- 17.
G.N. Ericsson, Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions 25, 1501 (2010)
- 18.
X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang, Commun. Surv. & Tutorials, IEEE 14, 944 (2012)
- 19.
E.Y. GmbH, Cost-benefit Anal. Comprehensive Use Smart Metering Syst. – Final Rep. – Summary (2013)
- 20.
F.C. Schweppe, Frequency Adaptive, Power-Energy Re-scheduler (1982), US Patent 4,317,049
- 21.
J.A. Short, D.G. Infield, L.L. Freris, Power Syst. IEEE Transactions 22, 1284 (2007)
- 22.
T. Walter, Smart Grid neu gedacht: Ein Lösungsvorschlag zur Diskussion in VDE—ETG (2014), http://www.vde.com/de/fg/ETG/Pbl/MI/2014-01/Seiten/Homepage.aspx
- 23.
B. Schäfer, M. Matthiae, M. Timme, D. Witthaut, New J. Phys. 17, 015002 (2015)
- 24.
G. Filatrella, A.H. Nielsen, N.F. Pedersen, Eur. Phys. J. B-Condensed Matter Complex Syst. 61, 485 (2008)
- 25.
D. Witthaut, M. Timme, New J. Phys. 14, 083036 (2012)
- 26.
M. Rohden, A. Sorge, D. Witthaut, M. Timme, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary J. Nonlinear Sci. 24, 013123 (2014)
- 27.
F.D. M., C.F. , Bullo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 2005 (2013)
- 28.
A.E. Motter, S.A. Myers, M. Anghel, T. Nishikawa, Nature Phys. 9, 191 (2013)
- 29.
P.J. Menck, J. Heitzig, J. Kurths, H.J. Schellnhuber, Nature Commun. 5, (2014)
- 30.
M. Rohden, A. Sorge, M. Timme, D. Witthaut, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 064101 (2012)
- 31.
J. Machowski, J. Bialek, J. Bumby, Power System Dynamics: Stability and Control (John Wiley & Sons, 2011)
- 32.
A.R. Bergen, D.J. Hill, Power Apparatus and Syst. IEEE Trans. 100, 25 (1981)
- 33.
D.V. Hertem, J. Verboomen, K. Purchala, R. Belmans, W.L. Kling, AC and DC Power Transmission, 2006. ACDC 2006. The 8th IEEE Int. Conference (IET, 2006), p. 58
- 34.
D. Manik, D. Witthaut, B. Schäfer, M. Matthiae, A. Sorge, M. Rohden, E. Katifori, M. Timme, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 223, 2527 (2014)
- 35.
R.D. Driver, Ordinary and Delay Differential Equations (Springer, 1977), p. 225
- 36.
M.R. Roussel, Delay-Differential Equations (2005)
- 37.
W.R. Inc., Math. Champaign Illinois (2014)
- 38.
K. Gu, J. Chen, V.L. Kharitonov, Stability of Time-delay Syst. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2003)
- 39.
P.J. Menck, J. Heitzig, N. Marwan, J. Kurths, Nature Phys. 9, 89 (2013)
- 40.
P. Schultz, J. Heitzig, J. Kurths, New J. Phys. 16, 125001 (2014)
- 41.
ENTSO-E, Network code on requirements for grid connection applicable to all generators (rfg) (2013), https://www.entsoe.eu/major-projects/network-code-development/requirements-for-generators/
- 42.
B. Naduvathuparambil, M. Valenti, A. Feliachi et al., Southeastern Symposium Syst. Theory 34 (Citeseer, 2002), p. 118
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schäfer, B., Grabow, C., Auer, S. et al. Taming instabilities in power grid networks by decentralized control. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 569–582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2015-50136-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date: