Advertisement

The European Physical Journal Special Topics

, Volume 222, Issue 9, pp 2207–2216 | Cite as

Quantum close-coupling calculations on conventional and coherence cross sections in Ca(4s4p,3P j=23P j=1) + RG inelastic collision

  • E. Paul-Kwiek
  • Katarzyna Szerement
Regular Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The quantum close-coupling studies of the 3P j=23P j=1 non-adiabatic transition in Ca colliding with He and Ar are presented. The multistructure cross sections are calculated using the pseudopotential curves of E. Czuchaj, M. Krośnicki, H. Stoll, Chem. Phys. 101, 292 (2003). The conventional and coherence cross sections that can be measured in collisional experiments with atomic beams are expressed via generalized Grawert parameters, quantities dependent on dynamics only and independent of geometry. They allow us to obtain direct relationships between the average cross sections and the conventional and coherence cross sections. The possibility of experimental determination of reorientation, alignment and other non-adiabatic effects occuring during atomic collisions is discussed.

Keywords

Collision Energy European Physical Journal Special Topic Atomic Beam Atomic Collision Collisional Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ch.J. Smith, J.P.J. Dreissen, L. Eno, S.R. Leone, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 8212 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ch.J. Smith, E.M. Spain, M.J. Dalberth, S.R. Leone, J.P.J. Dreissen, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 89, 1401 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. P.J. Dreissen, L. Eno, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 5532 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Paul-Kwiek, T. Orlikowski, Molec. Phys. 84, 971 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Paul-Kwiek, T. Orlikowski, Molec. Phys. 92, 781 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Czuchaj, F. Rebentrost, H. Stoll, H. Preuss, Chem. Phys. Lett. 182, 191 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Paul-Kwiek, J. Phys. B 35, 175 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Grawert, Z. Phys. 225, 283 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.H.G. Reid, J. Phys. B 6, 2018 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.H. Mies, Phys. Rev. A 7, 942 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.H. Alexander, T. Orlikowski, J.E. Straub, Phys. Rev. A 28, 73 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Pouilly, T. Orlikowski, M.H. Alexander, J. Phys. B 18, 1953 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Pouilly, M.H. Alexander, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 4790 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.H. Alexander, B. Pouilly, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5373 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Paul-Kwiek, M. Horodecki, Molec. Phys. 96, 1705 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Paul-Kwiek, J. Phys. B 34, 285 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Czuchaj, M. Krośnicki, H. Stoll, Chem. Phys. 292, 101 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences and Springer 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Paul-Kwiek
    • 1
  • Katarzyna Szerement
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysicsPomeranian University in SłupskSłupskPoland

Personalised recommendations